Patty_C_83

12.3K posts

Patty_C_83 banner
Patty_C_83

Patty_C_83

@PattyC831

Football fanatic. Tecmo Gawd.

Los Angeles, CA Katılım Haziran 2018
274 Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler
Patty_C_83
Patty_C_83@PattyC831·
@FBGreatMoments Not from my childhood (and maybe not even a running back), but right off the top of my head, Dri Archer
Patty_C_83 tweet media
English
0
0
0
126
Kalshi Football
Kalshi Football@KalshiFB·
Name a forgotten NFL running back from your childhood who you thought would would take off.
English
210
5
172
80.8K
Patty_C_83
Patty_C_83@PattyC831·
@NHL94Podcast They should exclusively use the camera angle from the game, too... just to keep it 100% authentic... maybe pixelate everything a little bit, too
English
0
0
1
30
Patty_C_83
Patty_C_83@PattyC831·
@NHL94Podcast Dude, technology should be getting to the point that this is possible... like, you should be able to putt whatever "skin" on the broadcast you want (including Ice Hockey and Blades of Steel)... would be VERY dope!
English
1
0
1
55
Patty_C_83 retweetledi
NHL '94 Podcast
NHL '94 Podcast@NHL94Podcast·
Hands up if you wish the NHL looked like this on your TV
English
15
18
178
6.9K
College Sports Only
College Sports Only@CSOonX·
The Sun Belt Conference tourney bracket is a thing of beauty. 😍
College Sports Only tweet media
English
13
32
485
46K
Josh Pate
Josh Pate@JoshPateCFB·
My barometer of CFB IQ is determined by where people fall on this debate
Josh Pate tweet media
English
221
23
1.4K
237.5K
Patty_C_83
Patty_C_83@PattyC831·
@FBGreatMoments I submit one James Brooks... only player to lead the SEC in Rushing Yardage and Kick Return Yardage in the same season (at least dating back to 1976)... and led the league in all-purpose yards his first two years in the NFL
Patty_C_83 tweet media
English
0
0
1
169
Kalshi Football
Kalshi Football@KalshiFB·
Name a player who was elite but never really talked about.
English
160
6
235
69.6K
Patty_C_83
Patty_C_83@PattyC831·
@JMUSportsNews There's enough meat on that schedule that we'd be in that CFP convo if we ball out... depth in the QB room is promising
English
0
0
3
103
Super 70s Sports
Super 70s Sports@Super70sSports·
Super Sky Point to Gene Hackman. Some actors are great good guys, some are great villains, some are funny. A chosen few are all those things in one exceptional package. That was Gene Hackman. You rooted for him like hell. Or, if he wanted, you despised him. A goddamn legend. #RIP
Super 70s Sports tweet media
English
242
742
11.4K
327.8K
Patty_C_83
Patty_C_83@PattyC831·
@JShelkop @FBGreatMoments Brass Nuts. Heart-wrenching, but you have to believe that it's that exact discipline of character, not to take the easy way out, that led them to 3 titles in the 90s.
English
0
0
0
17
Kalshi Football
Kalshi Football@KalshiFB·
Name a sports victory so sweet that it still brings a smile to your face when you think about it.
English
390
12
333
299K
Patty_C_83
Patty_C_83@PattyC831·
@SandoNFL Riggins and Joe Washington is a premium version of the old-school Power RB/Speed RB backfield combo (both true ball carriers) of days of yore
English
0
0
2
123
Connor Stalions
Connor Stalions@cpstalions·
7on7 has turned into a terrible thing for the development of the high school football game & players. The whole purpose of 7-on-7 to begin with was to give high schoolers reps in the offseason without having Spring Ball (with pads) like college does. That needs to be closely reevaluated, and if states actually care about the safety and development of their high schoolers, they’d benefit significantly greater from having actual Spring (or “Summer”) Ball than continuing on with 7-on-7s. The entire concept of 7-on-7 ultimately took 1 step forward while taking maybe 5 steps backwards for the game of football and development & safety of players. Pros of 7-on-7: - Competition (really just something to do) Cons of 7-on-7: - Competition - Unrealistic Personnel & Looks - Rewards bad habits at every position that have to be untaught and re-taught in the fall Competition: The pros of competition: obviously any time kids can compete it’s generally a good thing. And they get exposure to competition they wouldn’t have otherwise had the opportunity to do, so yes there are a few minor positives. And no, this is not a primary point, but it needs to be said, so that if anything the only concrete positive of 7-on-7s is countered. If you go to any given 7-on-7, you’ll most likely see one of three things… and unfortunately often all of them: 1. Players trash talking more than they communicate with their own teammates. 2. Players worried about their celebrations more than their own assignment. 3. Coaches trash talking opposing players & coaches. I’m all for some fun, but when the culture of 7-on-7 has completely shifted to players (and coaches) focusing more on what the opponent is saying than their own assignment, there’s no point of even competing and we’re just wasting everybody’s time & money. Unrealistic Personnel & Looks: It is completely in the offense’s best interest in a 7-on-7 to go Empty 4x1 on every single play. How many snaps of that do you see in a real football season? If any, can probably count them on one hand for most teams. Defensively: In a real football game, unless you’re in Prevent Defense with 5 seconds left defending a Hail Mary, on obvious passing downs (e.g. 3rd & 13) at most the defense would be in Dime Personnel (6 DBs on the field [4-1-6]). You’d have a Linebacker on the field considering there’s always some threat of a run. In a 7-on-7, however, all 5 Eligibles are Receivers, considering every play is a pass and there’s no pass rush. Even when the offense has a RB aligned in the backfield in a 7-on-7, he’s really a WR. He’s never in Pass Pro. So if you want to realistically compete defensively at a 7-on-7, there’s no reason not to have all 7 of your defenders be Corner-type defenders. If you have an actual Mike LB out there (who vs the pass in a real game is usually either playing the Hook or defending a Tight End or Back) he’s going to get stuck covering an actual elite WR which would almost never happen in a real game. So the response, from a competitive standpoint, is to put 7 DBs in the 7-on-7. So most teams have a Corner at Mike LB. And if you do have that actual Mike LB at Mike LB, then that takes us to the last point — Rewarding terrible habits for every position — which is such a long list, it has earned its own separate tweet.
English
136
173
1.6K
374.4K
Patty_C_83
Patty_C_83@PattyC831·
@TrevorKeveloh @elonmusk Santa Monica just going for absolute dead center on the woke venn diagram 🤼‍♂️🕺🤼‍♂️
English
1
0
1
14
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Maybe people in Santa Monica should consider voting Republican? 🤷‍♂️
Houman David Hemmati, MD, PhD@houmanhemmati

🚨 JUST when you thought @santamonicacity government couldn't get crazier (after planning to demolish art center, ice skating rink & massive parking structure for homeless housing), they prove you wrong. Just got email from city DEI office (city is broke but has one). Priorities: -Strengthening support for LGBTQ+ residents (in the most LGBTQ+ friendly place on earth) -REPARATIONS TASK FORCE for this broke city to start giving out REPARATIONS -Craziest of all, launching CANNABIS EQUITY PROGRAM because "marginalized communities" face "barriers" in cannabis. This reads like a joke but I promise you it is NOT.

English
4.8K
8.6K
43.1K
9.1M
Patty_C_83
Patty_C_83@PattyC831·
@FOS @KennyDillingham @NextUpWithAdam With Dillingham (ASU's first native Arizonan head coach) at the helm going all-in, they really could emerge as elite. They're a frontrunner school (like Miami) that struggles to win every week against a top-end schedule, but gets up for big games - the Big 12 is perfect for them.
Patty_C_83 tweet media
English
0
0
0
54
Front Office Sports
Front Office Sports@FOS·
Kenny Dillingham believes that Arizona State can become the next new "blue blood" of college football. "I really believe this place has the tools necessary." 🎙️ @KennyDillingham on @NextUpWithAdam
English
3
17
196
24.1K