Paul Lucé

1.1K posts

Paul Lucé banner
Paul Lucé

Paul Lucé

@PaulDanielLuce

Forward-Down-Diagonal+HP

Enola, PA Katılım Temmuz 2012
236 Takip Edilen101 Takipçiler
Paul Lucé
Paul Lucé@PaulDanielLuce·
@lilyraynyc I struggle with the "high-quality content" part. We heard that for 20 years, but it simply wasn't true. I suppose *this time* they mean it?
English
0
0
0
13
Lily Ray 😏
Lily Ray 😏@lilyraynyc·
This is classic Googlespeak l, but luckily I’ve spent many years learning the language 😂 My interpretation - “inauthentic mentions” probably applies to listicle pages (potentially self-serving ones, but not that’s explicitly stated here), paid/reciprocal brand mentions on 3rd-party pages, and inserting/paying for brand mentions in social threads, Reddit, etc. What are others’ interpretation of this?
Lily Ray 😏 tweet media
English
21
6
54
4.2K
Paul Lucé
Paul Lucé@PaulDanielLuce·
@lilyraynyc #IMlearningFX As a fellow human, I get why we humans do spammy things like this. But man, doing stuff like this is exactly what: - gives SEO a bad name - made the internet dumb - caused Google to backlash - put the industry roughly where it is now Great insights, @lilyraynyc
English
1
0
0
90
Lily Ray 😏
Lily Ray 😏@lilyraynyc·
Interesting timing: Google is dropping rich results support for *all* FAQ Schema as of yesterday, and is removing FAQ structured data reporting from GSC. (Link in comments) I wonder why they decided to do this *right now* in May 2026? Google had already deprecated FAQ rich results for most sites several years back, but had kept eligibility available for various high-authority sites, like .gov and health sites (they made this change during the pandemic). So, why deprecate FAQ rich results now? Putting on my tin foil hat - my theories on this: I wonder if this has anything to do with the influx of new articles (168k in the below screenshot) claiming that "FAQ schema is critical for GEO?" This guidance is spreading like rapid fire. Why does my mind immediately go here? Because we have already lived through this before. When FAQ Schema was first launched in 2019, it was an *incredible* SEO opportunity. Site owners were even able to add internal links to other pages on their site within FAQ answers, which showed up directly in the SERP. One of those rare "too good to be true" opportunities in SEO. I wrote about this on Moz in 2019 (link in comments), because our SEO team at Amsive was seeing great results using for this with our clients - especially in the form of lots of new impressions & clicks to the different links included in FAQ answers. In this Moz article, I also included a section called "Risks involved with implementing Schema," (also linked in comments) and described some potential misuses of FAQ schema for SEO purposes. I stated: "Avoid misusing Schema, or it’s possible Google might take away these fantastic opportunities to enhance our organic listings in the future." Unfortunately, that's exactly what Google ended up doing. (As I often say: anything that can be spammed in SEO, will be spammed.) There was so much FAQ Schema SEO spam in the search results, that we *all* lost the opportunity to continue earning rich results through FAQ Schema. I also eventually noticed that aggressively scaling FAQ questions/Schema was a common pattern among sites impacted by the Helpful Content Update. So, this wouldn't be the first time that Google is playing the cat and mouse game when they see too many sites using the same exact techniques "for SEO/GEO." Just an idea. (Sidenote: I am NOT saying not to use FAQs where it makes sense to, and the associated Schema can be helpful for reasons other than rich results on Google. I'm just commenting on why they might have made this change at this time) h/t @glenngabe @rustybrick
Lily Ray 😏 tweet media
English
31
47
305
36.1K
Paul Lucé
Paul Lucé@PaulDanielLuce·
#IMLearningFX Search engines are thriving, but publishers are feeling the squeeze. Google & Microsoft earnings show search revenue is surging, yet Google’s publisher network revenue just hit a record low. AI is shifting the value "inward." searchenginejournal.com/what-google-mi…
English
0
0
0
12
Paul Lucé
Paul Lucé@PaulDanielLuce·
#IMLearningFX Outstanding article by @gregjarboe. It's haunting how long low-quality SEO worked for. I think it defined the disciple, unfortunately.
English
0
0
0
0
borja
borja@borjafat·
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.5 can run your ENTIRE SEO Tired of chasing backlinks? Solved. Tired of AI slop articles? Solved. Tired of ranking for keywords that don't convert? Solved You just install a SKILL and you're ready to roll. Can run automated daily tasks on a schedule Comment "SEO" and I'll send it!
English
899
40
604
65.1K
Paul Lucé
Paul Lucé@PaulDanielLuce·
#IMLearningFX One of the most thrilling parts of this job is seeing how the unique becomes understood and normalized. Great article about #GEO #phaseweekfo" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">searchenginejournal.com/geo-playbook-l…
English
0
0
0
7