Paul

19.5K posts

Paul

Paul

@PaulFallows3

English serf; created through medieval leasehold law in uk. if I don't work to pay my freeholder and management company uncapped fees i will be made homeless😡

Katılım Nisan 2018
1.4K Takip Edilen881 Takipçiler
Paul retweetledi
Harry Eccles
Harry Eccles@Heccles94·
Why do rich people always fundraise by asking poorer people to donate to charity? Perhaps if you paid your taxes and paid workers a real living wage there would be less need for charity.
English
77
427
1.7K
15.6K
Paul retweetledi
Tim Jones
Tim Jones@Timothy37619215·
How many times do all the advocates for more extraction of North Sea oil and gas have to be told it won’t make one iota of difference to 🇬🇧 supply and prices . WE DONT QWN IT!!! The multinationals do . It was all sold off by Thatcher ffs !!!
English
349
297
1.3K
52.4K
Paul
Paul@PaulFallows3·
@BenGrahamUK Exactly!!! Total corruption. The new business model is not about profit. It's about building debt and avoiding taxes. That's considered a successful business model nowadays... Weird
English
0
0
0
3
Ben Graham
Ben Graham@BenGrahamUK·
NCP has gone into administration. They’ve been running car parks since 1931, and somehow ended up £305m in debt. Surely the maintenance for a car park is simple: ticket machines, barriers, lights, and occasional cleaning. How can a business model literally based on people paying to park go bankrupt?
Ben Graham tweet media
English
1.4K
571
4.7K
950.1K
Paul retweetledi
🇬🇧King 🇬🇧
🇬🇧King 🇬🇧@King0243_PJC·
Did you know that as of yesterday, birthright power in the UK is officially DEAD? The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Act is now LAW. After 700 years, the "accident of birth" no longer gives you a seat in our Parliament. The 92 hereditary peers are GONE. Why is the media burying this? Because they know the logic is undeniable: If it’s "indefensible" for a Lord to rule by inheritance, it’s even more indefensible for a King to do the same. We have admitted the hereditary principle is a relic of the past. Now it’s time to finish the job. If we don’t need unelected Barons, we certainly don’t need an unelected Monarchy. The first domino has fallen. Who’s ready for the next? #HouseOfLords #AbolishTheMonarchy #Republic #UKPolitics #DemocracyNow
🇬🇧King 🇬🇧 tweet media🇬🇧King 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
38
203
588
10.5K
Paul
Paul@PaulFallows3·
@proptechpioneer It's a political choice. They choose not to deal with it because the wealthy landowners are the establishment and that's who they are scared to confront!!!
English
1
0
1
7
Ashley from PRSim 🇦🇺
Ashley from PRSim 🇦🇺@proptechpioneer·
At a time where the UK is really going to need to do something to stimulate its economy - the fact the government has not been able to deal with LH reform will weigh heavily on growth. Whilst housebuilding is easy to switch on and off sales are not as dynamic as they are for apartments - the issue is developers will not be able to accelerate without confidence a market exists.
English
1
0
1
46
Kirstie Allsopp
Kirstie Allsopp@KirstieMAllsopp·
If this doesn’t make you furious, nothing will. Imagine what could have been done with that money. Anyone who has ever driven down the A303 knew that all that was needed was a cut, and they spent ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY NINE MILLION POUNDS of YOUR money doing eff all!
Moving Home with Charlie@moving_charlie

This is deeply symbolic of the British Bureaucracy sickness we are suffering from. £179m spent, for literally nothing. World class waste.

English
117
172
898
51.2K
Paul retweetledi
Stephen Murphy
Stephen Murphy@scmurphy·
This post says everything you need to know about how dysfunctional the freehold-leasehold system in England and Wales is and how housing association charities are anything but charitable
orwellvalley@orwellvalley

Well here's an update on the situation... Mortgage paid off. Security not included. I live in a flat I 'own'. I pay high service charges for a very modest home. No mortgage. No bank. No lender breathing down my neck. And yet by the end of April, I’m expected to find £9,000 immediately - with another ~£4,000 due in September. Not for something new. Not for something optional. But for historic costs tied to a building I bought in good faith - assuming it was structurally sound, properly converted, and fit to live in. I tried to be reasonable. I offered a repayment plan. £50 a month. ON TOP of £425 service charge for an unsaleable equity shedding cupboard in Bolton. £50 a month? Not perfect - but real. Sustainable. Honest. The response? A flat rejection. Pun intended. Not adjusted. Not discussed. Not negotiated. Rejected. Because the lease says payment is due “forthwith” - immediately - and anything else simply doesn’t fit the system. And then comes the part that really tells you everything. I’m told they can’t offer a repayment plan because: • They’re not authorised to provide credit • And doing so would breach their charitable aims Read that again. Helping someone spread payments over time - to avoid financial collapse - would somehow conflict with being a charitable organisation. So instead, the "charitable" approach is: • Demand the full amount immediately • Reject any realistic repayment proposal • Proceed with debt recovery if unpaid • And ultimately threaten forfeiture of the lease Debt Collection first. Then ultimately Yep - forfeiture, they've mentioned we'd be in breach of the lease. So yes they can do that. The legal mechanism where you can lose your home entirely. A home you’ve already paid for. There’s even a quiet warning built in. Interest at 3% above base rate hasn’t been applied yet…but might be from April if the balance isn’t cleared. So the pressure isn’t just financial. It’s escalating. Timed. Engineered to close in. And this is all happening within a system where service charges are only supposed to be payable if they are “reasonably incurred.” Well, That’s the theory. The reality? Years after major works. After tribunal proceedings. After residents have already stretched themselves to breaking point… We’re still here. Surviving from week to week - just. Still paying. Still absorbing the consequences of decisions we never made. These are leaseholders who had to wait til pay day to find £100 towards our legal defence. This is the part people don’t understand about leasehold until they live it. You don’t really own your home. You carry the liability. You absorb the risk. You fund the failures. But control? That sits somewhere else entirely. And you feel it flex. It reduces every week to a fight or flight response. Right now, the cost of simply remaining in my so-called mortgage-free flat is pushing towards the equivalent of a second mortgage. Except unlike a mortgage: • No negotiation. • No flexibility. • No safety net. Just a demand. • £9,000 by April. • £4,000 by September. Mortgage: paid. Security: none. If you want to see how detached decision-making can become from real human impact… Try being a leaseholder.

English
1
8
29
1.1K