Jayk.

824 posts

Jayk. banner
Jayk.

Jayk.

@PeachyRl

Katılım Mart 2020
374 Takip Edilen35 Takipçiler
Batt
Batt@Batt75765516941·
@ThunderBoltsTV @HaterReport I’ve never heard hand in cookie jar in basketball until SGA became relevant smh stop being a hoe
English
2
0
1
96
Hater Report
Hater Report@HaterReport·
That SGA whistle is Insane man lmao Clearly hooks Luke Kennard 😭💀
English
34
30
571
35K
Jayk. retweetledi
Brandon Rahbar
Brandon Rahbar@BrandonRahbar·
In a game with soon to be 2 time MVP SGA, 4 time MVP LeBron James, All Star Chet Holmgren and Austin Reaves.. ..the best player on the court tonight has been last year’s #38 overall pick from Belgian Waffle University.
English
17
130
2.5K
38.6K
Jayk.
Jayk.@PeachyRl·
OKC vs the world and I’m here for it
English
0
0
1
4
Jayk. retweetledi
Brandon Rahbar
Brandon Rahbar@BrandonRahbar·
Nick Collison (Special Assistant to the General Manager) will represent OKC on stage at the NBA Draft Lottery.
Brandon Rahbar tweet media
English
13
64
2K
29.8K
Jayk.
Jayk.@PeachyRl·
@JburnWill @FastbreakHoops5 Yes, the lopsided part is that the Clippers accomplished nothing with Paul George and OKC built a championship team out of that trade along with obtaining a future MVP. The trade is still giving OKC a lottery pick even this year after winning the finals last year.
English
1
0
0
131
J
J@JburnWill·
@PeachyRl @FastbreakHoops5 Gotta look at it like this PG was a great fit for the clippers they just never got the job done and in those years the clippers were in win now mode the thunder weren’t even competitive I think lopsided outcomes when I think bad trades
English
1
0
0
209
Fastbreak Hoops
Fastbreak Hoops@FastbreakHoops5·
Top 10 worst trades in NBA history.
Fastbreak Hoops tweet media
English
87
74
4K
453.9K
Jayk.
Jayk.@PeachyRl·
@JburnWill @FastbreakHoops5 Traded a future 2 time mvp, a solid role player, 5 first round picks and 2 pick swaps for a guy who accomplished them nothing AND left in free agency. OKC still getting their picks from that trade 7 years later
English
2
0
1
253
J
J@JburnWill·
@FastbreakHoops5 PG is not the worst trade ever grow up
English
2
0
0
2.6K
DNicetheArtist
DNicetheArtist@D22704492·
@TheHoopCentral Everyone looking at that last games we played against them. We didn't have our best defender to guard SGA. He could make it harder on him, well see though. No Jaylen Williams either.
English
1
0
1
1.1K
Hoop Central
Hoop Central@TheHoopCentral·
LAKERS VS. THUNDER SEMIFINALS Call it right now — Which team wins & in how many games?
Hoop Central tweet media
English
2.3K
348
6.2K
952.6K
Jayk. retweetledi
Bakkes
Bakkes@BakkesMod·
Thanks to everyone for your support over the last decade, but it's time to move on and close this chapter. More info here: bakk.es/articles/bakke…
English
967
2.2K
17.4K
844.6K
Jayk. retweetledi
Shai Gilly
Shai Gilly@FUCKMYGUNJAMMED·
Shai Gilly tweet media
ZXX
0
21
346
3.1K
Jayk.
Jayk.@PeachyRl·
@spainpnr Its a great way for coaches to blame it on something other than not being able to coach disciplined defense
English
0
0
15
860
Jayk.
Jayk.@PeachyRl·
@ridiculouscage It is because deni has hands on fox and not legal guarding position, the only contact between booker and caruso was the elbow from booker
English
0
0
5
1K
Cage
Cage@ridiculouscage·
so the same ref (James Williams) that called this an offensive foul for Devin Booker, decides to call it differently for De'Aaron Fox
English
100
307
5.6K
669.9K
Isaac Kfir
Isaac Kfir@isaac_kfir·
@FlyByKnite Do you also get the free throws that the Thunder got and the ball and the momentum back…
English
1
0
3
1.2K
Justin Russo
Justin Russo@FlyByKnite·
Just to clarify, the NBA put out a statement saying “following an investigation including multiple interviews and video review, the league found no basis to any claim of bias or misconduct by game officials” but then rescinded all THREE technicals that crew called.
English
121
2.2K
26.5K
429.1K
Jayk.
Jayk.@PeachyRl·
@barstoolsports Bro lead the game in freethrows and cried about referees
English
0
0
0
102
Barstool Sports
Barstool Sports@barstoolsports·
Devin Booker went OFF on the officiating tonight
English
94
87
1.8K
143K
Kobby Morant 🥽
Kobby Morant 🥽@KobbyMorant·
When Harden was foul baiting the whole NBA came together,spoke against it and even made rules so he couldn’t get away with it anymore. Why is the media quiet about SGA? What does he have on Adam Silver? How can one player shoot the same number of FTs as the other team? SMH 🤦🏾‍♂️
English
170
1.2K
12.5K
167.4K
Jered Baldini
Jered Baldini@JeredBaldini·
@game7__ Have you ever watched SGA? The dude is flailing around like he's been hit by a truck. She's not my favorite announcer in the least but she ain't wrong neither.
English
1
0
1
148
Game 7
Game 7@game7__·
Doris Burke is the worst broadcaster in sports. So biased. So incompetent. Literally awful. Burke is calling the Thunder and Suns first-round playoff series right now, and the fact that she is anywhere near a microphone during a game involving the Oklahoma City Thunder is proof that ESPN either does not care about its audience or does not understand why people keep turning the volume down. Burke has spent the better part of two years turning every Thunder broadcast she touches into a personal referendum on Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. She called him a "free-throw merchant" on air during the 2025 Western Conference Finals against the Timberwolves. She did not offer it as analysis. She framed it as a popular opinion she was comfortable endorsing, telling Mike Breen: "There's a reason NBA Twitter likes to call him the free throw merchant." She then doubled down in a later game, saying the way SGA draws foul calls is "why he's called the free throw merchant." When 19,000 fans in Minnesota started chanting "free-throw merchant" at SGA during Game 3, that was partly because a national broadcaster had legitimized the taunt on live television. In March 2026, during a Nuggets-Timberwolves game that SGA was not even playing in, Burke watched Anthony Edwards get called for an offensive foul and used the moment to take a shot at SGA. She prefaced it with: "I'm gonna be honest with you, and Oklahoma City fans are going to start hating on me right now. And feel free." Then she asked: "How many times does Shai Gilgeous-Alexander get away with that exact kind of play, and other players in the league?" She brought up the reigning Finals MVP, on a broadcast he was not part of, to criticize him for fouls she believed he should have been called for in other games. That is not analysis. That is an agenda. She did the same thing during Game 4 of the Western Conference Finals when she decided the broadcast needed a history lesson. After Rudy Gobert dunked on Isaiah Hartenstein, Burke said: "And I don't know much about history, but I know the French and German don't like one another. And Rudy says, 'Bonjour, Mr. Hartenstein!' Have a little bit of that left-handed dunk!" Breen's response was: "What are you trying to start here?" That was not color commentary. That was a broadcaster free-associating about World War II during a playoff game. The 2025 playoffs were full of it. During the Celtics-Knicks second-round series, Burke commented that Kristaps Porzingis "looks like a guy who hasn't had consistent minutes in a while" and called him "a step slow," seemingly unaware that Porzingis had missed 11 of his previous 14 games due to an upper respiratory illness. A broadcaster's job is to provide context. Burke was providing the opposite of context. The Finals made it worse. The Thunder defeated the Indiana Pacers in seven games to win the franchise's first championship, and Burke's commentary throughout the series was so widely criticized that it became one of the dominant storylines of the postseason. Fans called her "insufferable." Social media was flooded with complaints about her timing, her tone, and her inability to match the energy of the moment. During one broadcast, she and Richard Jefferson got tangled in an awkward, confusing exchange about the gather step and traveling rules that left viewers wondering if either of them understood the rule they were trying to explain. Draymond Green, who has been one of the most outspoken players in the league about media coverage, publicly called Burke out for what he described as a pattern of bias against him. After a February 2026 game against the Spurs in which Green scored 17 points while defending Victor Wembanyama, Green said Burke "will always ignore things happening to me and only half-mention the good. And take shots when they are available. Been that way for a while." Green pointed to a specific sequence in which Wembanyama had his arm wrapped around Green, and Burke ignored it while praising Wembanyama's resilience. During the 2025 playoffs, Burke questioned whether Green deserved the "leash" officials gave him, asking on air: "How many guys get this kind of leash, in the league, to get a Flagrant 1 and continue the discussion?" That is an opinion dressed up as a question, and it is the kind of commentary that shapes narratives rather than reporting on them. ESPN's own decision-making confirmed what the audience already knew. In August 2025, ESPN demoted Burke from its top broadcast team and replaced her with Tim Legler alongside Mike Breen and Richard Jefferson. Burke was moved to the No. 2 team with play-by-play voice Dave Pasch. ESPN executive Burke Magnus defended the decision publicly. Burke signed a multiyear extension with ESPN despite the demotion, but the move sent a clear message: the network heard the criticism and agreed with enough of it to act. And now she is calling the Thunder-Suns first-round series. The Thunder are the No. 1 seed and the defending champions. The Suns are the No. 8 seed who had to win a play-in game just to get here. Oklahoma City won Game 1 by 35 points, 119-84. SGA scored 25. And Doris Burke, the broadcaster who spent the last two years taking shots at SGA on national television, is the one ESPN assigned to call this series. That is either a tone-deaf scheduling decision or ESPN does not have enough people on staff who can call a basketball game without making it about themselves. The problem with Burke is not that she is a woman calling NBA games. That framing has been used to deflect legitimate criticism for years. The problem is that she is a broadcaster who inserts herself into stories instead of covering them, who uses the platform to push personal opinions about players rather than describing what is happening on the court, and who has demonstrated a pattern of bias that is visible enough for both fans and active players to call out publicly. Richard Jefferson wore a shirt that said "my favorite broadcaster is Doris Burke" after the demotion, and Indiana Pacers coach Rick Carlisle criticized the timing of the announcement. Burke has supporters. But support from colleagues does not erase the on-air track record that led ESPN to move her off its top team in the first place. A good broadcaster makes you forget they are there. A good broadcaster enhances the game. A good broadcaster provides context, energy, and insight without becoming the story. Burke does none of that. She makes herself the center of attention with hot takes disguised as analysis, random historical tangents that derail the broadcast, and a fixation on certain players that goes beyond commentary and into something that looks a lot like personal bias. ESPN demoted her for a reason. The audience complained for a reason. Draymond Green called her out for a reason. And Thunder fans who have to listen to her call this playoff series already know why.
Game 7 tweet media
Game 7@game7__

Day 15 of no apology from Dianna Russini. That's legit crazy. Meanwhile, the story just keeps getting worse and worse. It has been 2 weeks since Page Six published photographs of Dianna Russini and Mike Vrabel at a luxury resort in Sedona, Arizona. In that time, Vrabel has addressed his team, spoken to his coaching staff, had what he described as "difficult conversations" with his family, and stood at a podium at the Patriots facility in Foxborough to address the media. He promised the organization would get "the best version of me going forward." He did not hide. He did not deflect. He did not blame the media for covering a story that the media had every right to cover. He showed up, stood in front of reporters, and took ownership like an adult. Dianna Russini has not apologized for anything. She has not taken ownership of anything. She has not directly addressed the readers who trusted her reporting. She has not addressed the profession she spent more than 15 years building a career in. What she has done is resign before The Athletic could finish investigating her, post a resignation letter on X in which she described herself as a victim of "self-feeding speculation that is simply unmoored from the facts," and declared that she "stands behind every story I have ever published." That is not accountability. That is reputation management. And now, on Day 15, the New York Post has published new photos. These photos show Russini and Vrabel having breakfast alone at the Arizona resort. Just the two of them. At a table. No group. No friends. No hiking buddies. No mystery fourth, fifth, or sixth person from the "group of six" that Russini claimed was hanging out with them that day. This matters because Russini's entire defense was built on the idea that the original photos were misleading. Her statement to Page Six was: "The photos don't represent the group of six people who were hanging out during the day." A source described as close to Russini told Page Six she was on "a hiking trip with two female pals." The implication was clear: the photos only captured part of a larger, innocent gathering, and the framing made it look like something it was not. That explanation had problems from the start. Three eyewitnesses at the resort told Page Six they did not see anyone else with Russini and Vrabel. One witness, when asked if Vrabel was with a group of friends, responded: "No, he was with a girl." When the New York Post gave both Russini and Vrabel the opportunity to provide evidence supporting the "group of six" claim before publication, neither could produce anything. No text messages about planning the trip. No screenshots of coordinating arrivals. No photos from a group hike. Nothing. The Athletic reportedly asked Russini for the same kind of evidence internally, and she could not provide it there either. Now there are photos of the two of them eating breakfast alone at the resort. Not with a group. Not with friends. Alone. Every new piece of evidence that surfaces makes the "group of six" defense look worse. At some point, the question stops being whether the original photos were misleading and becomes whether Russini's response to the original photos was misleading. Vrabel has not tried to claim the situation was something it was not. His initial statement, issued the day after the photos were published, called the interaction "completely innocent" and said "any suggestion otherwise is laughable." That is a denial of wrongdoing, but it is not a denial of being there with her. He did not invent a group of people who were supposedly present. He did not claim the photos were taken out of context. He showed up on April 21 and talked about it publicly. He owned the fact that the situation created problems for his family, his staff, and his players. Russini's approach has been the opposite at every step. When the photos dropped, she and Vrabel reportedly coordinated their public response before either issued a statement. She reportedly contacted a crisis communications expert. She offered the "group of six" explanation. When The Athletic launched an investigation on April 10 into the nature of her relationship with Vrabel and whether she had been honest about it, she resigned four days later on April 14, before the investigation could reach a conclusion. Her resignation letter blamed the media for "repeated leaks" and described the coverage as a "public inquiry that has already caused far more damage than I am willing to accept." She wrote that she was stepping down "not because I accept the narrative that has been constructed around this episode, but because I refuse to lend it further oxygen or to let it define me or my career." Nowhere in that letter is an apology. Nowhere is there an acknowledgment that her explanation did not hold up. Nowhere is there a recognition that every NFL story she filed during the years she covered Mike Vrabel's teams now carries a question mark. She covered the Tennessee Titans for ESPN during Vrabel's entire six-season tenure as head coach from 2018 to 2023. She moved to The Athletic and continued covering the NFL, including the Patriots after Vrabel was hired in January 2025. Every scoop she broke, every source she cited, every piece of insider information she reported during that stretch now comes with a question the audience cannot answer: was this journalism, or was this access granted through a personal relationship with the head coach? That is not speculation. That is the professional consequence of a journalist being photographed in what appeared to be an intimate setting with a source she actively covered, failing to provide evidence for her explanation, and resigning before her employer could finish looking into it. Those are her choices. Those are her actions. And she has not taken responsibility for any of them. Vrabel is a football coach. His job does not require editorial independence. His job does not depend on the audience trusting that his relationships with people in the industry are professional. He does not owe anyone objectivity. And yet he is the one who stood up and addressed the situation publicly, multiple times, while the person whose entire career was built on credibility has said nothing beyond a carefully worded resignation letter that reads like it was drafted by a publicist. Multiple outlets have reported that Russini's husband, Kevin Goldschmidt, may have hired a private investigator to follow her. If that reporting is accurate, it suggests this was not a one-time meeting that happened to get photographed. It suggests a pattern that someone close to her suspected and wanted documented. Some have framed this as a gender issue. Jemele Hill argued that male reporters have broken "cardinal rules" without losing their careers, and there is a real conversation to be had about double standards in sports media. But that conversation does not apply here. The issue is not that Russini was photographed with a source. The issue is that she was photographed in what appeared to be an intimate setting with a source she covered, that eyewitnesses contradicted her explanation, that she could not produce evidence supporting her version of events, that she coordinated her response with the person she was photographed with, and that she resigned before her employer's investigation could conclude. Male reporters would face the same scrutiny for the same set of facts. Adam Schefter was criticized for years after emailing a draft story to a Washington front office executive for approval in 2011, and that involved far less than what has surfaced here. It has been 15 days. Mike Vrabel has taken more public accountability for this situation than Dianna Russini has. He has spoken to his family. He has spoken to his players. He has spoken to the media. She has spoken to nobody except through a resignation letter that blamed everyone but herself. And now there are new photos of the two of them having breakfast alone at the resort, and the "group of six" defense is looking less credible by the day. If Russini wants the public to believe she did nothing wrong, she can start by explaining why every piece of evidence that surfaces contradicts the story she told.

English
232
85
695
279.4K
Jayk.
Jayk.@PeachyRl·
@espn can you give us a broadcast that is just the game so I don’t have to listen to Doris Burke
English
0
0
0
69
Incorruptible
Incorruptible@jelocortez·
@PlayoffKaden If I were the ref I will call if its a foul but everytime he fouls and acts like he is getting fouled he either gets an offensive foul for initiating contact or technical foul for flopping
English
1
0
0
86
Kaden
Kaden@PlayoffKaden·
Can someone explain this to me?
Kaden tweet media
English
186
385
5.7K
103.9K