PerfectlyImperfect

What are the odds you get 2 random texts, one on your phone other on X at the same time?

Blocked 🤣

This is the kinda shit my entire life that happens to me. I'll let yall know if I got a job!! 😀

Please @public Could you please approve the letter I sent to turn my acct. Back on?

Gotta represent! 😆🏇🐮🤠 youtu.be/tNrt-t5GRww?si…

5 more years, its paid off. I won't piss yall off about my low interest rate.

@Jessie_9525 Ever try frozen grapes?

Grabbed some grapes from Asda earlier and this little fella has turned up looking absolutely bizarre! Is it an orange? A tomato? Or has a grape gone rogue? I’m properly intrigued now!

@MattWalshBlog I have tried to slowly wean off EffexorXR Only 75mgs. Its just to unbearable the brain zaps are ruthless. If I skip a day and a half, its over. Quit drinking Cold turkey. No problems. Did you leave Daily? I'll re- friend ya when ya do. 😉

It has very recently become acceptable to express skepticism about anti-depressants and anti-anxiety meds. The skeptics used to be angrily shouted down (I know from experience). But the skepticism is meaningless if it doesn’t go all the way and question the fundamental premise. These medications aren’t just “overprescribed.” They should never be prescribed at all. Anxiety and depression are not literal diseases, and any attempt to treat them as such is doomed to fail. We are witnessing the failure right now.

Cheeeeeese N Riiiceeee

@ThrillaRilla369 Just did a few weeks ago making bacon gravy and homemade biscuits 😋

My girlfriend says no one did it. But who remembers saving bacon grease in a can on the stove to cook with later?

When is everyone going to start realizing that the manic on again off again war/peace rhetoric is really just insider trading? And sprinkle in some murder. Only a select few in the top tax bracket are benefiting from this, and the majority of you ain’t in it.

@topkekius I cant stay mad at you.

if quantum entanglement means two particles remain connected across light-years, perhaps love operates the same way. distance is irrelevant once a link is formed.

I concur

@JeremyDBoreing So what he is saying what's good for the goose isn't always good for the gander?

The video is Prime Candace. Every manipulative rhetorical technique in the books. She makes roughly 236 claims in roughly 30 minutes in what is probably one of the most concise examples of a Gish gallop I have ever seen. A Gish gallop is firing off so many claims in rapid succession your opponent can’t possibly address them all. Even if every claim is wrong, the preponderance of false claims produces the impression of a devastating case. Coupled with Brandolini’s Law, which posits that the amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it. The whole process is meant to make the accused look crazy for even trying. Candace uses rhetorical sleight of hand to accuse me of accusing her husband of lying on his immigration documents. I might respond that I’ve never made any such claim. But Candace has already suggested I’m working with Laura Loomer to launder the accusation against her. I might respond that I haven’t spoken privately to Laura Loomer in years. But Candace has already moved on to say that I’m coordinating with Ben Shapiro to launder ideas to Laura Loomer. So I might respond that I haven’t spoken to Ben Shapiro in over a year, other than a single text exchange when Charlie died. But Candace has already moved on to calling me a creep. Each of my responses, by the way, will be immediately attacked in its own right. Candace’s audience will insist her accusation is true, even though she has offered no proof, and will likewise demand I provide proof of my counter claim. Asymmetric skepticism and burden shifting. I will not be able to prove that I didn’t make a claim, because one cannot prove a negative. Sure, they won’t be able to show any proof that I did make such a claim, but no burden of proof applies to them. Show us your texts! You must have deleted the texts! You had a stupid haircut as a child! The over 200 accusations scale with your answers. Answering one doesn't drop the total to 235 – it scales it up exponentially, because your answer becomes the source of a new onslaught of charges from Candace and her legion. Pretty soon, not only is the sheer number of accusations condemning, but the sheer number of accusers becomes proof that Candace is winning! Vox populi, vox Dei! Trying to defend yourself against such madness is madness. It’s like trying to nail Jello to a wall. You might think there is one claim I simply have to address: That a Daily Wire employee was arrested for sex crimes involving a minor. But while that accusation is terrible, it has nothing to do with me. As the document Candace posted makes clear, this person was arrested in May of 2025. I left the company in March of 2025. Whatever actions the company did or didn’t take when it learned of the situation, I was not a part of it. To be honest, I’m not actually sure what Candace is accusing me of, other than her deeply twisted statement that “people who support Israel will also protect the Epstein class of pedophiles.” Protect how? What exactly am I being accused of? I would ask Candace to state her allegations clearly and specifically. Otherwise, I choose door number three. By the way, if you employ enough people, you will inevitably employ some terrible ones. Hell, I once employed Candace Owens! Employees are people. If you have enough of them, you have all of the different kinds of people there are. Some will even be criminals, and you will have to fire them, which is what I’m guessing the Daily Wire did in this case. Other than that, I have nothing to say to Candace. She invited me to come on her show to talk about George, but I have nothing to say about George at all. She invited me to talk about this person she says committed this terrible crime, but an hour of “Have you stopped beating your wife,” guilt-by-association slander isn’t my idea of a good time. And I may not be the smartest person in media, but I’m just sophisticated enough to know you can’t have a good-faith conversation with someone who uses rhetoric in such dishonest ways. Candace doesn’t want to talk; she wants to overwhelm me with so many allegations and insinuations, so much projection and presupposition and false consensus signaling that her audience builds a negative narrative about me – whatever negative narrative sticks! I see no reason to engage in that kind of spectacle. Also, my audience is rightly concerned for my safety if I go to Candace’s studio.

@voiceofrabbis 🇺🇸

If you're Jewish or non-Jewish, please, let the world know: Video from last night in Monroe NY, The message was unmistakable: “We oppose and have no part in Zionism and State of israel” Not fringe. Not small.

Thats why he was shot! 😳

BREAKING: Israel is dropping bombs on Lebanon’s capital city of Beirut. They are deliberately targeting densely populated neighborhoods. This is what they call a “ceasefire.”

Accurate

Forget everything you learned in school—the richest man on Earth is doubting our entire reality! Elon Musk doesn't buy the "we’re just atoms" story. He’s betting there’s something massive we’re ignoring—something that’ll be "obvious" in the future but we're too blind to see now. Is it a soul? A higher dimension? Or something way darker?

@ElofsonJess Clueless their souls can still be saved.

Hunger games anyone?