Dril

33.5K posts

Dril banner
Dril

Dril

@Peroda813

Nurse. Human. The miracle is not to fly in the air or to walk on water, but to walk on the Earth.

Katılım Eylül 2015
1.2K Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Dril
Dril@Peroda813·
@prestigeflowers Picture 1 ordered, picture 2 delivered. Refund denied, delivery of missing flowers denied. Paltry £10 future credit offered. I quoted statutory rights they state that by agreeing to their terms and conditions that they can refuse refund. 9364906
Dril tweet mediaDril tweet media
English
1
0
3
81
Dril
Dril@Peroda813·
@motea_shop Attention all UK bikers. Ordered from motea.UK site. Note-UK. UPS arrived today and asked for £60 import taxes. At no point in the order process did it state was arriving from abroad. I have refused delivery and await full refund, including delivery.
English
2
0
0
15
Dril
Dril@Peroda813·
@QcWynter @Alisdisgrace The poor data isn’t always from poor recording but from ability to extract data. Patient records aren’t entered on extractable formats, excel. They are in unique individual electronic records. Software overhaul to allow this would be £££ with confidentiality consideration.
English
0
0
0
21
Colin Wynter KC
Colin Wynter KC@QcWynter·
@Alisdisgrace Who in medicine and/or science keeps poor records? Why do they keep poor records? The answers to those two simple questions probably reveal more than enough for us to know what to do with this new study.
English
4
2
21
166
Colin Wynter KC
Colin Wynter KC@QcWynter·
Correct. Instead of ignoring Keira Bell and treating her as a medical pariah, sit her down and talk to her. Listen to her. Write down what she says. Learn. Repeat with the other hundreds of Keira Bells. They are the "experiment". It has happened. Find them. Talk to them. Sorted.
Sall Grover@salltweets

Hear me out: a more effective thing to do would be to study all of the young people who have already used the drugs and then “detransitioned” rather than to create more of the exact same situation. Basically, start paying attention to the people who already have the answers.

English
27
416
1.9K
27.3K
TheMoustacheCop
TheMoustacheCop@CopMoustache·
First person who correctly names where I’m heading and I’ll donate £10 to a charity of your choice 😊👍
TheMoustacheCop tweet media
English
83
0
116
27K
Dril
Dril@Peroda813·
@WoodlandNomad Looks like the Whumping tree in Harry Potter.
English
0
0
2
24
Bruce Bowman
Bruce Bowman@boswelltoday·
@Echinops2025 I'm part of the same chamber, but I think it is an easy win given the SC ruling mood music.
English
12
1
281
10K
Bruce Bowman
Bruce Bowman@boswelltoday·
Day 7 | PM Session | Peggie v NHS Fife & Dr Upton 👄“Words as Violence - But Whose?”: Peggie Tribunal Exposes the Hypocrisy of NHS Fife’s Language Doctrine Day 7 of the Peggie tribunal didn’t just put NHS Fife’s policies on trial - it put its vocabulary under cross-examination. For months, the board has cast Sandie Peggie’s use of male pronouns for Dr Upton as an act of symbolic violence: the verbal equivalent of exclusion, even aggression. But this afternoon’s testimony exposed the hypocrisy beneath that charge - and asked a harder question: if misnaming someone is a harm, why did NHS staff do it themselves? Angela Glancy, the lead investigator into Peggie’s conduct, was back in the witness box. Calm and methodical, Naomi Cunningham led her through the institutional theatre of pronoun discipline. “You weren’t confused,” she asked, after Glancy admitted to slipping into male pronouns when Cunningham used them in questioning. “No,” Glancy replied. She simply reverted to her trained pattern. The spell of compelled speech, it turned out, could be broken with a single unapproved utterance. That moment, measured and factual, was enough to tie opposing counsel Jane Russell in procedural knots. She objected to the use of “exercised” as too loaded, the pronouns as too confusing, the tone as unprofessional. Yet all the while, her argument rested on a belief system that demanded linguistic compliance from Peggie, but showed little concern for the shifting syntax of its own witnesses. Her discomfort, it seemed, was not with incivility, but with clarity. It was Glancy’s agreement with a hypothetical that set the real terms of the debate. Cunningham posited a man named Pete - broad, masculine, bearded - entering the women’s changing room as Peggie undressed. Would Peggie be right to object? “Yes,” said Glancy. But Dr Upton, biologically male, had walked into the same room. What made one situation inappropriate and the other inviolable? The answer lay not in appearances or facts - but in words. Pete said nothing. Upton said, “I’m a woman.” That, apparently, changed everything. Then came Anne Hamilton, the HR adviser who supported the investigation. Under pressure, Hamilton revealed that the original draft of the report on Peggie referred to Upton using “they/them” - and, in places, “he/him.” Only in later versions were these replaced with “she/her.” Peggie, meanwhile, stood accused of misgendering. Cunningham didn’t need to editorialise. The tribunal could see it plainly: NHS Fife had disciplined a woman for saying what the board itself had once written. Even more striking was the revelation that Upton had met privately with the investigator, Angela Glancy, to “adjust” the notes from their interview - without any record, without a second party present, without transparency. Peggie was never offered the same. Hamilton tried to frame it as policy-compliant, then admitted it was “not ideal.” The tribunal heard the subtext: editing the record was allowed, as long as the edits affirmed the right narrative. Throughout, the evidence pointed to an unstated rule: words only wound when spoken by unbelievers. Peggie’s language, rooted in sex-based reality, was framed as hostility. Upton’s assertions - about identity, entitlement, and access - were treated not only as valid but as sacred. The board’s own shifting vocabulary became a litmus test: speak the right words and you were protected; speak the wrong ones and you became a disciplinary target. By the end of the session, the tribunal was no longer hearing about pronouns as a linguistic preference. It was seeing them as a mechanism of control. Peggie’s “he” was not a slip, nor a slur - it was a refusal to participate in a belief system she did not share. And for that refusal, she faced what can only be described as institutional reprisal. Meanwhile, the very agents of that reprisal - managers, investigators, HR staff - used the same “misgendering” language themselves, without consequence, until it became administratively inconvenient. If this afternoon proved anything, it’s that the real violence wasn’t Peggie’s use of male pronouns. It was the system’s attempt to dictate what words she was allowed to say - and to punish her for saying what was once, and still is, undeniably true.
English
101
475
2.4K
137.8K
Dril
Dril@Peroda813·
@ornowitza @MrMalky That’s the one that got me too. An absolute highlight.😂😂
English
0
0
7
385
DuchessofOrnowitza
DuchessofOrnowitza@ornowitza·
@MrMalky Or KS Beth has every right to use the facilities she wants under the GRA. NC What did u look at to satisfy yrself? 🚨KS If u google it there's many refs for trans ppl and CR🚨
English
6
1
60
4.8K
Dril
Dril@Peroda813·
@tribunaltweets Did NHS have to answer their petulant statement? Was sit discussed at the hearing?
English
0
0
0
192
Tribunal Tweets
Tribunal Tweets@tribunaltweets·
The fourth day of the July hearing of Peggie vs NHS Fife & Dr B Upton is due to start at 10am. We anticipate a discussion regarding NHS Fife's statement of 18.7.2025 before the next witness, Charlotte Myles, is called.
Tribunal Tweets tweet media
English
60
202
1.1K
180.2K
Dril
Dril@Peroda813·
@Fyrishsunset I am an RCN member and have been since 1985. Shortly to retire. I want her to sue them to H and back.
English
0
0
1
33
Aviemore
Aviemore@Fyrishsunset·
Day of reckoning for the RCN … Sandie Peggie, a fully paid up member for some 30 years, is suing her trade union, claiming it failed to support her because of her gender-critical beliefs. heraldscotland.com/news/25325910.…
English
430
1.4K
11K
211.8K
Dril
Dril@Peroda813·
@treesey Yep, emailed 20 consultants. Disgusting. With subsequent discussions as how he should phrase/rephrase his comments.
English
0
2
20
1.1K
Dril
Dril@Peroda813·
@QcWynter Delighted about the disciplinary outcome. I really hope she is issued a profound apology from that avenue, distinct from settlement from the legal process. I suspect not so hopefully the humiliation of NHSfife disciplinary process management & HR team will be recompense enough
English
0
0
1
99
Colin Wynter KC
Colin Wynter KC@QcWynter·
I have no idea what is taking place behind the scenes in Dundee in Peggie v NHS Fife but after the legs have been swiped from under one's case in way that the disciplinary has done to Fife's defence, talk typically turns to settlement. Everything goes quiet until an announcement.
English
55
153
2.5K
133.5K
Dril
Dril@Peroda813·
@carol_catsx7 @AshReganMSP So, I’ll bite. A click bait or a bot. Work in the NHS, 30 years, bare minimum effort, you WILL get a complaint. We are expected to go above and beyond as the new bare minimum. Every. Single. Day.
English
0
1
11
306
Ash Regan
Ash Regan@AshRegan_·
I stand with Sandie Peggie - a nurse of unblemished record for 30 years. Her employer NHS Fife should have been celebrating such dedication and service, yet Sandie has been forced to take them to an employment tribunal. 1/9
English
85
1.1K
9.5K
505.2K
Dril
Dril@Peroda813·
@joannaccherry Will we not hear confirmation or otherwise of appointment until November?
English
0
0
0
47
Joanna Cherry KC
Joanna Cherry KC@joannaccherry·
Oh and they don’t even have the intellectual honesty to say that the real reason for their opposition to her appointment is that she has stood up for the rights of women and lesbians. Parliament is shamed by this. thetimes.com/article/5cc666…
English
41
485
2.5K
71.8K
Dril
Dril@Peroda813·
@LozzaFox What on Earth car do you drive?!
English
0
0
0
5
Laurence Fox
Laurence Fox@LozzaFox·
Can someone explain to me why another year of safe driving and no claims bonus costs £166 extra a month in Britain? I thought you got rewarded for not crashing your car. Seems not.
Laurence Fox tweet media
English
3.8K
1.4K
17.8K
2.3M
Dril retweetledi
Michael Foran
Michael Foran@michaelpforan·
There is nothing to rush here. If your policies are compliant with the law as clarified by the Supreme Court ruling then you have nothing to do. If they’re not, then you’re liable right now. You’re either exposed to significant risk for liability or you’re not, right now.
English
2
58
433
13.3K