SeelPhilosophy

The main political issue Worldwide is a fundamental shift on principles of individual Liberty. The remedy is to educate people on these fundamentals to restore Liberty. If this concept were widely known, then we would see a dialectical revolution back towards individual Liberty.

@mattcorvin1 When are you going to stop deflecting and reason your Right to kill innocent human beings? I'm going to repeat this until you can reason your position.

ELECTIVE LATE TERM ABORTION THREAD : Yes, “late term” abortions are a real thing. Abortion clinics themselves acknowledge this and use the term. But just to make prochoicers feel better, I’ll refer to them as “later term” abortions- referring to abortions at/after viability.

@mattcorvin1 @again_jenn When are you going to stop deflecting and reason your Right to kill innocent human beings? I'm going to repeat this until you can reason your position.

@mattcorvin1 @again_jenn Ad circulum. When are you going to stop deflecting and reason your Right to kill innocent human beings? I'm going to repeat this until you can reason your position.

@mattcorvin1 @dancingcrane @again_jenn @Maestra_Momma @SgtKOnyx @DSiPaint @Prolife_Sam This is pretty close to a dozen strawman fallacies now. Let's talk about your moral relativism and why you're willing to deny facts of objective reality by outright lying. Is it your cognitive dissonance preventing you from accepting truth, or are you feminist beta?

@mattcorvin1 @again_jenn Not inconsistency. That much is obvious. What isn't obvious to you is that there are two logical requirements you must reason against. When can we expect you to reason against number 1?

@mattcorvin1 @again_jenn When are you going to stop deflecting and reason your Right to kill innocent human beings? I'm going to repeat this until you can reason your position.

@mattcorvin1 @again_jenn It doesn't matter, as you still can't reason the Right to kill innocent human beings. When is that going to happen?

@mattcorvin1 @again_jenn False equivalency fallacy! It's not claiming you have the Right to terminate your parental responsibilities. Rights do not require permission from a court to exercise. This is talking about handing over responsibility to the State with the State's consent. #DunningKruger

@mattcorvin1 Another strawman? Try again without the Sophistry.

@mattcorvin1 @again_jenn Your argument has nothing to do with my graphic dimwit. When are you going to reason the rape victims Right to kill innocent human beings? Stop deflecting and reason this, unless you don't have the ability to.

@mattcorvin1 @again_jenn The Sophist has no Right to demand anything when you have zero credibility. Which part of you arguing from .5% of the time is not a valid form of logical argument is difficult to grasp? Do you have a learning disability?

@mattcorvin1 @again_jenn False, this is not my claim. My claim: People are responsible for their actions to include those that cause pregnancy, obviously if you consented to sex. A rape victim still has no Right to kill innocent human beings, which renders your argument irrelevant.

@mattcorvin1 @again_jenn Lying again? No guy can march into court and claim they're not going to pay their child support because they renounce their responsibility.

@mattcorvin1 @dancingcrane @again_jenn @Maestra_Momma @SgtKOnyx @DSiPaint @Prolife_Sam Your claim to irrelevance is fallacious, as I've already pointed out that you're still responsible for your actions regardless of your education in ethics.

@mattcorvin1 @dancingcrane @again_jenn @Maestra_Momma @SgtKOnyx @DSiPaint @Prolife_Sam And if you knew anything about Social Contract theory, then you'd know that Rousseau and Hobbes resulted logical inconsistency, evident in their inability to ethically legitimize their philosophy, hence why Locke's Social Contract theory is sound, while others are not.

@mattcorvin1 Again, this has no logical coherency. Do you have some sort of cognitive disability?

@mattcorvin1 It's not a false equivalency. The argument is about parental responsibility being derived from the consequences of their actions, which begins with having sex, and continues through the term of parenthood.

@mattcorvin1 @Maestra_Momma Stop moving the goalpost. This is the 6th time you attempted to use the same fallacious argument. It is not a logically valid argument to argue from the rare exception, which is still irrelevant since she cannot reason the Right to kill innocent human beings.

@mattcorvin1 @Maestra_Momma Which part of "not logically relevant to her argument" is difficult to grasp?