NC State came in squarely on the bubble and gets boat raced by 16 seed Duke to kick off the ACC tournament.... yikes.
Final resume:
32-21 (14-16 ACC)
48 RPI
33 DSR
26 SOS
6-11 Q1
@TuckerBlanc@fitzbizzel92007@11point7 But current health of team would lead to those series wins turning into getting swept so yea I’m out on us. Give it to an equally deserving healthy team that can maybe do some damage. Cause we sure can’t
@Tigers_Den2019@CBBcontent I can’t wrap head around it either. He has a legit gripe to appeal Elig. I just don’t know if in today’s world he is able to return or not.
I was saying for most (maybe all) ILL guys they’re scooping up players NCAA already ruled as Freshman thanks to their Euro ties on staff
@Tigers_Den2019@CBBcontent Lol no just cause they’re from overseas does not equal the same thing.
I haven’t stumbled across why/how but clearly NCAA eligibility rules have shifted
@YankeesFiles Yep, there are a couple apps out there that pull all the data. I use one a buddy created, will probably make it public at some point, but we're tinkering with a metric in it.
TJStats has a public one here, if you know which player it's easy to use: tjstats.ca/catch-probabil…
Lots of requests for this Taylor Ward double past Trent Grisham yesterday.
45% catch probability on this ball from Statcast. Not an easy play, but one you want a CF to get.
@PhilsTailgate Fair enough. Didn’t realize JT was still scooting as much as he is these days. But I do like the idea of when he’s off he’s off.
Part of me still thinks, if we’re that worried about speed of Ghost runner because of the bats. Just bunt at that point (which I don’t want)
Absurd catch yesterday by Jacob Young of the Nationals. Just 2% catch probability on this one from Statcast (rounds up to 5%).
Why doesn't it look that hard for Young? His jump was one of the best of the year, over 12 feet above average.
@itsmeandrewl@TheWARmonger_@GolfStatsDFS According to his photo.
It’s looking at 2 rudimentary data points.
How far was the run and how long was ball in air.
It’s not that deep
@PickEm2Win@TheWARmonger_@GolfStatsDFS Which direction the fielder is running is irrelevant to the argument you’re making about shading. The italics do nothing for you
@PickEm2Win@TheWARmonger_@GolfStatsDFS You talked about the fielders SHADING. It’s irrelevant when talking about the exact point the fielder starts at. My god man
@TheWARmonger_@itsmeandrewl@GolfStatsDFS But it still doesn’t factor in he and everyone is breaking hard right from that spot, coupled with on that pitch type.
Am I missing something?
@PickEm2Win@itsmeandrewl@GolfStatsDFS No, he's arguing with an incorrect AI summary. All you had to do was open MLB's official breakdown of outfield catch probability
@PickEm2Win@TheWARmonger_@GolfStatsDFS Google AI is not a source to site my man lol. It inherently factors it in, BECAUSE ITS BASED OFF EXACTLY WHERE THEY ARE STANDING IN THE FIELD! If it’s based off where the fielder is standing when the ball is hit, where the fielder is shaded will be a part of it. This is so simple