Matthias Piesche

10.6K posts

Matthias Piesche banner
Matthias Piesche

Matthias Piesche

@PiescheLab

Scientist @ UCM. @DanaFarber/@HarvardMed Alumni. Passionate about #cancer immunology, #immunotherapy & what the gut #microbiome has to do with it

Katılım Eylül 2013
1.2K Takip Edilen2.2K Takipçiler
Matthias Piesche
Matthias Piesche@PiescheLab·
Important 2 know the difference between correlation & causation. Maybe someone should also analyse the connection of breathing & autism. Its worse: 100% of children with autism were breathing air from birth to diagnosis with a concentration of 21% O2 and 78% N2
Simon Maechling@simonmaechling

This “study” looks serious. It has an abstract, authors, even affiliations. But read it carefully - it’s pure satire. And it brilliantly exposes one of the biggest flaws in bad science: confusing correlation with causation. “Over 90% of autistic children consumed breast milk or formula milk.” Sounds alarming - until you realize: over 90% of all children consume breast or formula milk. That’s not a discovery. That’s basic biology. The fake authors - I. M. Amoron, U. R. Gullible, N. O. Control - mock real-world habits of pseudoscientific papers: no controls, no confounders, no significance, but big claims. Exactly how misinformation about vaccines, food, or chemicals spreads. And then there’s this gem: 👇 A “Letter to the Editor” mourning the loss of a control group that only consumed saline. “We are beside ourselves.” Dark humor - but also truth. You can’t always test nutrition or medicine by comparing it to… nothing. Both jokes share one message: Bad science isn’t funny when it drives public fear. It’s what happens when people demand “gold-standard” trials without understanding how science actually works. The moral? You can always find a “correlation” if you look hard enough. Correlation is easy. Causation is hard - and that’s why science demands evidence, not coincidence. So next time you see a viral “study” that blames something ordinary for a complex condition… ask two questions: Was there a control group? Did they prove causation - or just correlation? If not, congratulations - you just passed your first course in critical thinking. Humor can be a powerful teaching tool. These parodies remind us that critical thinking isn’t optional - it’s survival. Because behind every “funny” fake study, there’s a real one being misused by someone who doesn’t get the joke.🧠 Thank you @IntegralAnswers for this example.

English
0
0
0
79
Matthias Piesche
Matthias Piesche@PiescheLab·
The bad bad #mRNA #vaccine against #cancer works. How can that be? Isnt it the devil from the COVID vax? Maybe reading real scientific studies instead of listening to all the Google educated "scientists" could explain it. Thanks @EricTopol 4 showing this publication. Encouraging
Eric Topol@EricTopol

How do mRNA vaccines help fight cancer? A @nature publication today tells the story, one with big implications, as reviewed here @MDAndersonNews @StevenLin_MDPhD @adam_grippin erictopol.substack.com/p/how-mrna-vac…

English
0
0
0
61
Matthias Piesche
Matthias Piesche@PiescheLab·
@farid__jalali Have you also looked into other cytokines? Especially TGFb? Fluvo & Niclo can suppress it and we hypothesized that TGFb play a prominent role in severe C19 and might also be important in LC
English
0
0
0
12
Matthias Piesche
Matthias Piesche@PiescheLab·
@ArmchairResist No I don't have any. But I think integrative can be important. Eg, a healthy diet and exercise
English
0
0
0
5
Matthias Piesche
Matthias Piesche@PiescheLab·
I would also add: risks failure/bankruptcy of the company (especially if it is a small one)
English
0
0
0
61
Matthias Piesche
Matthias Piesche@PiescheLab·
@StuffedNation @Forbes Your article doesnt say anything about the pot. negative effect of artif. sweeteners on the gut microbiome. I wouldnt call them save. More & more studies show the importance of a healthy microbiome, eg, cancer, autoimmune diseases, aging, etc. A disruption could be detrimental
English
0
0
0
14
Matthias Piesche
Matthias Piesche@PiescheLab·
Doesn't mean they're autom. the best, just have better opport. @ their early career. There was a paper few years ago demonstrating that Early-career factors largely determine the future impact of prominent researchers: evidence across 8 scientific fields nature.com/articles/s4159…
English
0
0
0
96
Matthias Piesche
Matthias Piesche@PiescheLab·
Postdocs: highly educated, working horses of innovative discoveries, low salary, long working hours, no job security - find the problem Falling behind: #postdocs in their thirties tire of putting life on hold nature.com/articles/d4158…
English
0
0
0
63