Pin
578 posts



@ButcherXStream @SpartansBet I think after you posted this you really lost any argument you had, seems to me you tried to scam them. You did not disclose any of this information, only played the victim. You’re just mad your friend was stupid enough to redeposit on a site he tried to fuck.
English

Yo guys,
After my earlier posts, the owner of @SpartansBet actually appeared and made the player an “offer”…
They’re now offering to let him withdraw just $8k out of the $25k he won.
Like… what the actual fck?
Is this seriously how a casino should treat its players?
Since when can you negotiate / bargain a withdrawal amount like it’s a flea market?
Thoughts?
English

For example, have you streamer coordinator reach out to people like those are wagering $35 million and only got $14,000 with AD3. Perfect opportunity to say hey, we will value you more. Come play at winna in 2026.
You can figure out what he can say but for example: We will do a match of whatever your airdrop was. Instant access to 15% and better wager requirements than shuffle to unlock the remainder.
English

My idea is to run a targeted retention campaign focused specifically on high-value Shuffle players.
Shuffle made a costly mistake that affected players. Instead of general promotions, the $400,000 could be used strategically to repair relationships with the platform’s most valuable users.
The approach would work similar to the existing VIP match system. Identify Shuffle’s highest wagers and offer them access to a special compensation pool funded by the $400k. Access could require meeting a wagering threshold so the funds are tied to continued activity rather than being a simple giveaway.
This approach focuses on acquiring and retaining the top wagering players for 2025. High rollers often know and communicate with each other, so gaining trust with a few key whales can influence others to follow.
In my view, winning back a small number of high-value players could generate more long-term value than spending the same amount on streamer marketing.
English

Sounds great, but just a quick disclaimer: this is not a Stake. Whatever you deposit here is at-risk until proven otherwise. While it may look similar in UI, the key difference is the Anjouan gambling license. That’s usually a sign the platform attempted to onboard cheaper, quicker and with less compliance requirements. Personally have researched - it’s about $17,888 annually for a license, though the first year can be more expensive depending on fees. Curaçao is about $50,000.
Not that the amount matters, but for context, Curaçao licensing is already considered fairly light in terms of regulation, and Anjouan tends to be viewed as even less established in the industry. For example, say YEET decides to not pay you out, an Anjouan licensed casino has almost no framework for player disputes. Basically they’re non-existent. They ask you to resolve with casino, and the only requirement is the casino must reply within a certain timeframe.
Moose’s offers sounds nice. And I think he is only trying to market yeet. I’m not saying he is a scammer and I’m also not saying yeet casino is a scam. But always be wary. Just felt I should post this.
English

If you like gambling and want to try YEET -
I’ll give you a $1,000 deposit match.
Tier match you.
Part of my $2500 weekly leaderboard.
Any affiliate fees I make is yours.
HUGE airdrop 🔜
And make sure you’ll well looked after.
Dm me or sign up 👇
yeet.com/register?aff=M…
English

Hey, I’ve noticed a lot of frustration in the shuffle community after the AD3 result. Many players seem genuinely upset, and I think this could actually be a great opportunity for Winna to gain market share by directly reaching out to those disenfranchised players.
You’re actually the only casino I’ve contacted with this idea. I personally play on Winna and would happily recommend it to friends.
I know you already offer VIP matching, but positioning it with a targeted promotion, like an additional 20% bonus specifically for shuffle players, could be a strong marketing angle right now. If you pushed that message in the right places, I think it could work really well for Winna and attract a lot of players looking for a new platform.
English

@paulwinnacom @Winna @Tanzanite_xyz Hey Paul, wanted to DM you about the shuffle fiasco. I think it’s a great opportunity to winna
English

January was huge for @Winna!
- +51.3% unique depositors vs Nov25
- Battling for the #10 deposit volume spot on @Tanzanite_xyz - wen top 5?
Drop your Winna user/stats below and I’ll send some tips!!


English

$1 million essentially stolen from the players of 2025 👏. Don’t celebrate $1 million in rewards when we are the ones fronting the bill each week. Playing for what we already earned. Not only that , but this is also a scam, $20 : 1 shuffle “wager-to-vest”. At current prices say I get AD $1000 of SHFL this week, my expected EV to unlock would be under $300 with only a 1% house edge. (If your KYC is slightly better I know).
Congrats Noah, you lost all trust in your community, but I know what you’ll say: be grateful. What about you?
Where would you be without us? Your loyal players raised you up all the way to even be considering to buy stake this year.
You can twist this any way you like. You screwed your community. You should know that.
I recommend any casino owner take this chance. So many shuffle players will happily leave. Exclusive shuffle vip match sounds like a great idea.
English

@FrankDribbl You are genuinely one of my favorite shuffle ambassadors and the reason why I stick around. When everyone else seems to not give AF, you seem chill and kind. Hope you continued success. Also congrats on the win, wish you continued success.
English


If the 80 percent was always meant to require additional wagering into 2026, that should have been clear from the beginning. Retroactively attaching conditions to an allocation shifts value away from the community. That is why people are frustrated. The conditions have changed because that is what benefits the platform most. Take what you were given, 5X it. That’s what you were entitled to. Changing the rules after the fact is always a bad look.
English

@CookerFlips @shufflecom Why do people think it's scam that U have to wager to get the rest 90%?
Like we won't wager it anyway.. 😅
English


All community members should seriously consider boycotting Shuffle following the changes to AD3.
Regardless of how this decision was justified whether through tokenomics, growth strategy, or rewarding the most loyal 2026 players the outcome is straightforward: Players are now receiving roughly 20 percent of the originally structured allocation.
For this to be financially neutral one of two things would need to occur:
1.SHFL would need to appreciate approximately 500 percent, or
2.This change would need to prevent a 50 percent or greater decline that otherwise would have happened.
Anything short of that represents a net transfer of value away from the community AD3 was intended to reward.
It was originally structured as a 90,000,000 SHFL allocation. Presented as a thank you to players who supported the platform over the past year. That was the understanding.
Redirecting 80 percent of that allocation into a weekly Top 10,000 race materially changes that framework. What was positioned as a loyalty distribution is now a wagering volume incentive mechanism.
This is not a question of whether the strategy is intelligent. It may be, and I think it will likely work if, us, as a community allow it.
Instead, it is a question of consistency, expectations, and loyalty.
At the same time they are taking our allocation away, Shuffle streamers have publicly shown compensation in SHFL tokens. Meaning that marketing expenses are essentially funded through token dilution, while AD3 allocations are also being reduced. No one disputes Shuffle’s operational success. But here’s the reality. It’s you and it’s them.
They simply don’t care. The goal is high-margin extraction until eventually more regulation comes in and destroys the business model. If you as a user, want shuffle to start caring about its community, we need to hit them where it hurts most. Stop playing there.
Trust, once eroded, cannot easily be repaired. @noahdummett @shufflecom
The community deserves clarity, consistency, and commitments that remain intact after they are announced.
English

AD3 Week 1 allocations will be live today in a few hours - remember that the majority of tokens will be distributed weekly over the next 52 weeks, but this first drop will be the biggest (20M tokens).
The way we've structured this new wave of Airdrops means that our best Shuffle players should receive around 3x as many tokens over the year in comparison to if we just did one big airdrop. When you do one big airdrop, the top 30 whales end up getting most of the tokens, even if they only played for a couple weeks of the year (which is how the first two airdrops panned out). We've designed this so that we get the token in the hands of the right players 🤝
English
Pin retweetledi

@noahdummett @shufflecom You’re a fraud. It was clearly stated that for AD3 we would receive $90 million worth of tokens based on our performance since AD2. Now you’re suddenly saying we only get $20 million, and the remaining $70 million only if we keep losing everything weekly?
English

@noahdummett I understand the logic, but your explanation is lacking authenticity. This is being done for growth and this solution is simply the most economical for shuffle. It’s not for the players. AD3 was meant to reward those who made shuffle a top 3 casino. Now we pay a weekly for VIPs
English








