The Secrets Of Heaven

Who cut these perfect giant cubes?

@DJSnM @NASAAdmin Now redo the calculations assuming sun is the same distance from earth as the moon and same size as the moon… Enjoy the cog diss.

Yesterday while driving to the airport for a training flight I heard @NASAAdmin talking about the impact flashes observed by Artermis II crew on the dark side of the moon. Specifically I heard these described as 'Micrometeorites' and thought they would be bigger, so it got my brain running on estimating the actual size of these objects based on what I knew. By the time I got to the airport 10 minutes later I had concluded the mass of these impactors is kilograms, so not 'micro' meteors, and that's not a dig at Jared by any means, for his EVA on Polaris Dawn he had almost certainly discussed micrometeorites, things the size of a grain of sand, that could damage the suit. But, what I really want to talk about is the mental arithmetic I did while driving, because I do these order of magnitude estimates for all sorts of questions. So I don't have any deep understanding of how bright the flashes would have been to be visible to the crew, I don't have a deep understanding of human visual acuity. But I started from the assumption that this is comparable to a faint star appearing for a second or so. I know the absolute magnitude of the sun is 4.8, that's how bright the sun appears at 10 parsecs. That's towards the fainter end of stars, and if one appeared for a fraction of a second it might register. I know a Parsec is 206265AU. (and 206265 is number of arc seconds in a radian). I also know the solar constant at earth is about 1370W/m^2. So to get the solar flux at 10 parsecs I'd have to divide by 2062650^2 - but that's too much math, just approximate to (2*10^6)^2 - or 4x10^12. dividing 1370 by 4 is roughly 350 or 3.5x10^2 Which puts solar illumination at 10parsecs at about 3.5x10^-10 W/m^2 So that's my standard light flux for 'faint star'. Let's now assume the flash lasts 1 second to avoid adding extra math, change watts into joules. Now, reverse this and figure out the energy of the object on the moon, for that we'd need to know how far they were from the moon. And I didn't carry that around in my head, but, I knew the closest approach was about 4000 miles, and the eclipse was past closest approach. So I used the number of 10,000km because that's 10^7m making the math easy - I need the square of that so 10^14. To figure out the energy emitted we take the energy per square meter and multiply it by the surface area of the sphere with a radius equivalent to astronaut's viewing distance. Take that 3.5x^-10J and multiply it by 4xPIx10^14 4 Pi is about 12.5, so I use 3.5x12.5 as about 40 (because I know 12.5x4 = 50). It's about 7% low but I don't care for small errors. So total energy is 4x10^5J. But that's just the energy that comes out as light, the energy of an impactor mostly goes into other forms, I learned this while making my video on @NASAAmes Vertical Gun Range. I know it's between 0.01-1% of the kinetic energy that comes out as light. So, using 10^-3 that gives impactor energy of 4x10^8J Now figure out the impactor mass, impact speeds are 10-15km/sec, remember kinetic energy goes as v^2. Now you might think that 10km/sec gets you a nice factor of 10^8, but then you need to multiply the mass by a factor of 2 (because of 1/2 m v^2). But if you use 14.14km/sec then that eliminates the factor of 2, and puts the velocity closer to the high end. So, point is I just adjust the energy by 10^8 and leave the 4 part as my mass estimate. 4kg of course. Not a micrometeorite. So, my mass estimate for an impactor is on the order of a few kilograms, but there's massive error bars here, because I don't know how bright the flashes looked to the astronauts, I don't have a detailed model of the human visual system or the luminance conversion efficiency of meteorites. I have an order of magnitude estimate I did in my head while driving, and 90% of the process is just multiplying by powers of 10, simply adjusting the exponent. Sure you have to carry numbers around like the solar constant, absolute magnitude of the sun etc. But I bet many of you have esoteric numbers you carry around in your heads. I then proceeded to go flying and feel soundly humbled by ATC overloading my brain.

Are people really this dumb🤷🏼‍♂️👇🏼😑

@jstamby @TheMoonCarl @go_howl I don’t do laundry lists. Pick your best ONE and I’ll debunk it then you can pick another and so forth.

@PlaneAndTruth @TheMoonCarl @go_howl Did I win my Nobel prize yet?!

Covid was the biggest scam in human history. 9/11 was second biggest scam. The moon landing was third biggest scam. Artemis comes in at number 4. What else did I miss?

@jstamby @TheMoonCarl @go_howl Those are some retarded claims without any citations at all, no evidence whatsoever. Just ai hallucinating Reddit slop it’s trained on.

@PlaneAndTruth @TheMoonCarl @go_howl x.com/i/grok/share/9… 🥱🥱🥱

Who believes in the moon landings make some noise!! Comedy Club comedian is quite funny in this video 😁 😂

@jstamby @TheMoonCarl @go_howl Cool, now that you know the method, just go out and debunk it. Go measure that curving water and publish your results, no one has ever been able to, you will surely get the Nobel price in physics if you can show water curving over distance.

@PlaneAndTruth @TheMoonCarl @go_howl lmao this is so dumb and wrong.

@SurvivalistPt @TheMoonCarl @go_howl Thanks, it’s cheap, you can get signal mirrors on Amazon for a few bucks, and there’s plenty of YouTube videos demonstrating how to flash them 10-20-30-40 even 50 miles away…

@PlaneAndTruth @TheMoonCarl @go_howl I like your mirror idea .

@house_santo @TheMoonCarl @go_howl Why don’t you debunk it?

@PlaneAndTruth @TheMoonCarl @go_howl How are people so stupid and unemployed to post something like this?

Thats your best argument? First of all, no, you cannot build the device yourself, most universities doesnt even have the tech and they are backed by billions of capital.., second,they shot lasers and claimed return signal 7 years before they allegedly placed any “reflectors” on the moon…

This is the best arguments I have heard against moon landing hoax. I love this.

An account with over 275000 followers… he’s not doing the globers any favors by posting cgi that even community notes detect… thanks dude you just made people question, if they really did this, why the need for faked ai generated “photos”?

It says you guys are gullible AF…

It’s funny to me that they have to make shit up to support their dumb ball theory. and then they ask us “why would they lie?” Because of people like this, they make up stories, add a video that’s clipped and the sheeple wont question it, then the lie is spread by themselves… 👇

Gotta love how NASA wants us to believe they have the ability to take super clear, high resolution videos in outer space but for the astronaut recovery they have to use a camcorder from 1998. 🥴

@KassKille The official story is 150 million kilometers..,

@WhiteHouse @NASA Weird that no sunshine hits the top surface of the moon? The distance from the Sun to earth is 15 million km. The distance from Earth to the Moon is 400 000km. 400 000/15 000 000=0,0267=2,67% Thus, the distance difference between Earth & the Moon is neglectable!

EARTHSET. April 6, 2026. Humanity, from the other side. First photo from the far side of the Moon. Captured from Orion as Earth dips beyond the lunar horizon. Photo: NASA

This fake moon mission is truly a blessing in disguise. I underestimated how much positive would come from them actually trying to fake it again. This could potentially end NASA’s credibility for good. I can think of way better things to do with their $25 billion annual budget.

@palis You’re half awake. Congrats, now ACTUALLY look into how the Greeks “proved it”

I’m not a flat earther, the Greeks proved earth is a sphere 3000 years ago, but everything from NASA is fake. All the footage and pics from Apollo 11 were fake or “digitally enhanced”, this isn’t speculation or conspiracy this has been proven. Same with all older pics of Mars. The Blue Origin trip seemed fake af, the recent Indian mission footage was laughably fake. It’s all fake. Idk if we’ve been to the moon in the 1960s but it seems pretty unbelievable. Everything in lower orbit is real and can be verified, SpaceX is legit. Everything beyond lower orbit can’t be verified, and is fake and gay until proven otherwise beyond a shadow of a doubt

@ILuvRussia Kan prova

@PlaneAndTruth Har du möjlighet nästa fredag kl 21 så vore det riktigt nice. En som kör foliehattsfredag. Denna fredag är det flat earth som gäller. Han får in typ 80 svenskar på sina live.

Don’t you EVER dare asking me where the earth begins and ends when you have this kinda gobbledygook coming out of the mouth of your so called “scientists”… I’ll just spit it right back at you. How about you just accept the honest most logical answer? NOBODY KNOWS!

Well… the claim is that earths radius is 3959 miles… but everywhere we try to confirm that by measuring the curvature of water over distance fails… over 10 miles for example, a laser shot 1 foot over the water on Beach A HAS to end up about 50 feet OVER beach B if we live on a sphere… it wont… because water doesn’t curve. It will end up a foot over the water on the other side as well… you can add standard refraction if you like, I’ll grant it to you, add a little extra if you really need to cope, 25% good enough? (Standard here would be 16%, I’m giving you extra) still wont help you, now you deal with 40 feet of missing curving water…, water doesn’t curve, accept it.