Nobody ☀️🌈🏰🕊️🌕🐝

71.8K posts

Nobody ☀️🌈🏰🕊️🌕🐝 banner
Nobody ☀️🌈🏰🕊️🌕🐝

Nobody ☀️🌈🏰🕊️🌕🐝

@PlasticDogs

🐶 Support animal shelters & children's charities 🇺🇸 Temporary Sanity 🤠 SFIN EXFI SGB APS HLN FLR BANK HP MANA BBX 🕊️ Eternal Nobody ☀️💛🌹

Asgard Katılım Mart 2020
4.4K Takip Edilen3.1K Takipçiler
Invisidon
Invisidon@QuantumAlteredX·
Live conference incoming!
Invisidon tweet media
English
58
1.2K
10.9K
82K
Quantic
Quantic@0xQuantic·
Next stage: value accrual.
Quantic tweet media
English
13
17
141
5.1K
Quantic
Quantic@0xQuantic·
Big congrats to the Flare ecosystem for hitting a new TVL all-time high! 🥳
Quantic tweet media
English
18
39
171
6.2K
Nobody ☀️🌈🏰🕊️🌕🐝 retweetledi
Mini Archillect
Mini Archillect@miniarchillect·
Mini Archillect tweet media
ZXX
11
75
326
10.9K
AltarOfEgo 🪐
AltarOfEgo 🪐@unidentifiedta1·
A disturbance in the Force
English
5
7
55
2K
SilverTrade
SilverTrade@silvertrade·
Peter Brandt's taking Victory Laps
SilverTrade tweet media
English
18
5
56
9.2K
Immortal X
Immortal X@ImmortalSerito·
@unidentifiedta1 Mother-in-law sounds like a shrewd confidant...nobody would make that kind of alliance.
English
1
0
4
194
AltarOfEgo 🪐
AltarOfEgo 🪐@unidentifiedta1·
It’s the Year 2026…and my Mother-in-Law asked me today… “AoE, I have been reading about Peter Thiel and even read his book. Do you think…he’s playing everybody?” Me: “Nobody Knows.” ♟️
English
3
1
46
2K
Nobody ☀️🌈🏰🕊️🌕🐝
There's a reason you won't find me in those spaces
Shellfish🐚$⨊Ɛ⧫⧫Ϝıϟ⟁@XRPeaceOfMind

Spaces used to feel revolutionary. Not because everyone was right — but because everyone was thinking out loud together. Somewhere along the way, that changed. Conversations shifted from: → exploration → to evaluation From: → “what can we build?” → to “who’s right?” And you can feel it. Less curiosity. More correction. Less synthesis. More soundbites. It’s subtle, but it changes everything. Because once a space becomes: proof-based instead of consensus-based… people stop taking risks. They stop sharing unfinished ideas. They stop being wrong in public. They stop building in real time. And that’s where innovation actually lives — in the messy middle. Now a lot of conversations feel like: courtrooms disguised as communities. Everyone defending. Everyone auditing. Everyone positioning. Very few actually listening. And when that happens, the highest signal people don’t fight for attention… they just leave. Or build quietly somewhere else. So what’s left? Recycled takes. Surface-level debates. Performative intelligence. The irony is: We’re building decentralized systems based on consensus and coordination… …but communicating in environments optimized for conflict and proof. That mismatch matters. Because the future won’t be built by who’s the most right. It’ll be built by who can: → integrate → collaborate → and move ideas forward together Maybe the next evolution isn’t louder Spaces… Maybe it’s better environments that reward signal, synthesis, and shared understanding. Because if we don’t fix the way we communicate… we’ll slow down the very systems we’re trying to build. Consensus > proof of

English
0
1
2
162
Dr Schwety
Dr Schwety@SchwetyBigBags·
It’s actually much better, and more radical, than I expected. Just speculation, but here’s what I think he means: No, It’s not some sort of lock up or fees paid in flr, just to use the network. Locking tokens just to use a system limits growth. We don’t want that. (Sometimes that’s necessary for institutions/corporations but I don’t think that’s what he’s talking about here). Here’s what I think he’s talking about: A new block format where every block incorporates verifiable, on-chain attestations of ecosystem activity. (think FAsset collateral/mints, liquidity, data requests via oracles, etc). The data becomes part of the block. When the data becomes part of the block, the “value capture” flows from it. (Which is very radical indeed. Others try to do it through DAO’s, this is built into the chain). So, ideas we’ve mentioned in the past are still in play, they’ll just flow through the block/protocol, rather than through a DAO or something else. (Again, much more revolutionary). Burns, buybacks, boosted staking yields, XRPFi liquidity, RWA yields, rewards, or anything really, are performed at the block/protocol level. It turns $FLR into equity that scales with adoption. Again, just speculation until the FIP is released, but suffice to say I remain super pumped about it. Hopefully this week!
Nordic Cryptionist@CryptonistNord

@SchwetyBigBags Wasn't that what you expected from the radical governance proposal? x.com/i/status/20342…

English
9
12
74
7.3K
Nobody ☀️🌈🏰🕊️🌕🐝
Hodl copper and silver
Balaji@balajis

I'm going to make some obvious points. (1) Blowing up all the oil infrastructure in the Middle East is an insane idea, and may well result in a global economic crash and humanitarian crisis unrivaled in the lives of those now living. We're talking about the price of everything everywhere rising, from food to gas, at a moment when inflation was already high. All of that will be laid at the feet of the authors of this war. (2) The antebellum status quo of Feb 27, 2026 was just not that bad, but we're unlikely to return to it. Expect indefinite, long-term, ongoing disruptions to everything out of the Middle East. (3) Also assume tech financing crashes for the indefinite future. The genius plan to get the Gulf states caught in the crossfire has incinerated much of the funding for LPs, for datacenters, and for IPOs. Anyone in tech who supported this war may soon learn the meaning of "force majeure" as funding gets yanked. (4) Many capital allocators will instead be allocating much further down Maslow's hierarchy of needs, towards useful basic things like food and energy. (5) It's fortunate that all those progressives yelled about the "climate crisis." Yes, their reasoning about timelines was wrong, and much of the money was wasted in graft, but the result was right: we all need energy independence from the Middle East, pronto. It's also fortunate that Elon and China autistically took climate seriously. Now they're going to need to ship a billion solar panels, electric vehicles, batteries, nuclear power plants, and the like to get everyone off oil, immediately. (6) It's not just an oil and gas problem, of course. It's also a fertilizer problem, and a chemical precursor problem. Maybe some new sources will come online at the new prices, but it takes time to dial stuff up, particularly at this scale, so shortages are almost a certainty. That said, China has actually scaled up coal-to-chemicals[a,c] (C2C), and there's also something more sci-fi called Power-to-X[b] which turns arbitrary power + water + air into hydrocarbons. But all of that will need to get accelerated. I have a background in chemical engineering so may start funding things in this area. (7) Ultimately, this war is going to result in tremendous blame for anyone associated with it. It's a no-win scenario to blow up this much infrastructure for so many people. Simply not worth it for whatever objective they thought they were going to attain. But unless you're actually in a position to stop the madness, the pragmatic thing to do is: scramble to mitigate the fallout to yourself, your business, and your people. [a]: reuters.com/business/energ… [b]: alfalaval.com/industries/ene… [c]: reuters.com/sustainability…

English
0
0
1
366
Isostran
Isostran@isostran00·
⛱️
GIF
QME
3
1
2
147
Steven Crowder
Steven Crowder@scrowder·
According to CNN's own data analyst @ForecasterEnten: -MAGA grew from 28% to 30% since Trump's election win -Trump holds 100% approval among MAGA -90% of MAGA approves of US military action in Iran MAGA is not dead. The movement shouldn't be defined by those who quit it.
Piers Morgan Uncensored@PiersUncensored

“I do not recognise our president… MAGA is dead!” Carrie Prejean Boller says Donald Trump has “betrayed his country” by starting a war in Iran with Israel, after removing her from the Religious Liberty Commission. 📺youtu.be/XhW1oApxw74 @piersmorgan | @CarriePrejean1

English
1.8K
1.4K
8.8K
352.2K