LeProfessor Plesa

15.5K posts

LeProfessor Plesa banner
LeProfessor Plesa

LeProfessor Plesa

@Plesa15

☘️ 🐻 🇭🇷 💧🟡/⚫️

Katılım Kasım 2011
224 Takip Edilen281 Takipçiler
nick wright
nick wright@getnickwright·
I'm not sure if it's possible or if they'd even want to talk to me, but this is me openly requesting @Mrjamieohara1 & @Chelsearory invite me on their show as a guest at some point. This is true, elite sports talk radio & I love it to my core. Ten out of ten, fellas.
talkSPORT@talkSPORT

🤔 "Does Messi get in our team?" 👀 "Would you swap Kane or Bellingham for Messi?" 😳 "Today, Harry Kane is better than Lionel Messi..." Jamie O'Hara was left baffled by Rory's claim that, currently, Harry Kane is better than Lionel Messi 🤣

English
88
97
2.6K
748.6K
DK
DK@dkaz·
@Plesa15 Misread your post lol
English
1
0
1
7
john
john@clunk72·
@Plesa15 So looking at the first part of the line before you made it dip. If it continued on its path as you state it would have cleared the stand at the far end
English
1
0
2
1.9K
Boris Weyson
Boris Weyson@XRL_Veloce·
@Plesa15 @FPLWoofer The video is showing a completely different angle lmao. And that isn't the path of the ball 😂
English
1
0
0
458
Destroyer
Destroyer@Brett_qpr·
@Plesa15 You've drawn lines to make it suit you but I've legit have had my goalkicks do this completely normally
English
3
0
91
14.9K
LeProfessor Plesa
LeProfessor Plesa@Plesa15·
@FPLWoofer Are you arguing that the line isn’t the flight of the ball? Because I mean you clearly see that it is the flight of the ball, go look at the video
English
6
0
59
1.8K
FPL Woofer
FPL Woofer@FPLWoofer·
@Plesa15 Those lines aren’t there in the stadium - they’re added by someone onto a moving camera. The rear view that everyone is banging on about is explained by ball spin, Gordon is running to where the ball lands before it reaches its apex, and fifa have shown there was no touch.
English
4
0
12
1.9K
FPL Woofer
FPL Woofer@FPLWoofer·
@Plesa15 We can all draw lines to suit what we believe. Getting a bit obsessive now though lads. Norway scored a lucky cross and couldn’t score a 2nd without fouling. Maybe get some fresh air.
English
2
0
29
11.1K
Michael van Niejenhuis
Michael van Niejenhuis@MNiejenhuis·
@Plesa15 But don’t worry, we totally and legitimately saw something come up on our sensor to rule out the Croatia goal…
English
1
0
114
12.5K
LeProfessor Plesa
LeProfessor Plesa@Plesa15·
@kdsb89 @goddek If you’ve ever actually played the sport and have a set of eyes, no ball drops from the sky dead like that on the trajectory it was on from the goal kick
English
1
0
0
13
Dr. Simon
Dr. Simon@goddek·
This sensor detected a Croatian player touching a ball that no camera on Earth saw him touch: GOAL DISALLOWED. The same sensor felt nothing when the ball visibly smashed into a camera cable and handed England a goal. It detects hairs but not steel cables. Impressive technology.
Dr. Simon tweet media
FIFA Media@fifamedia

Before England’s goal in minute 45+2 against Norway, the sensor in the Connected Ball showed no peak in the 'heartbeat of the ball' when in the air, and therefore no evidence that the ball touched the overhead wire and changed the movement of the ball.

English
199
1.5K
8.7K
291K
Aid
Aid@Aid_L10·
@Plesa15 @TIMLEWIS1985 @D_Thon I dont want us to win like that, most England fans wouldnt either. Some nobs would claim its payback for the "hand of god". But its not what we're about, we want to win in merit not through dodgy refereeing
English
1
0
4
336
Dagfinn Thon
Dagfinn Thon@D_Thon·
Det betyr enten: A) Teknologien funket ikke. B) Sensoren registrerte at ballen traff vaieren, men FIFA lyver om det nå fordi de ikke sjekket det før de satte i gang spillet etter scoringen og tenker det er «beste utvei» av situasjonen å lyve vs. innrømme en komplett skandale.
FIFA Media@fifamedia

Before England’s goal in minute 45+2 against Norway, the sensor in the Connected Ball showed no peak in the 'heartbeat of the ball' when in the air, and therefore no evidence that the ball touched the overhead wire and changed the movement of the ball.

Norsk
253
745
10.8K
584.4K
Aid
Aid@Aid_L10·
@Plesa15 @TIMLEWIS1985 @D_Thon Ive seen it from a better angle without the pause and to be fair it does look odd/like the balls hit something. So I will hold my hands up. I'm ok with admitting when I'm wrong I just didnt see anything from other angles. The sensors in the ball is clearly shit
English
1
0
10
378
LeProfessor Plesa
LeProfessor Plesa@Plesa15·
@Aid_L10 @TIMLEWIS1985 @D_Thon If you don’t believe FIFA would cover up their own mistakes and believe everything they say, then idk what to tell you boss.. the eye test is clear lol, a ball doesn’t drop like that just because
English
1
0
30
948
Aid
Aid@Aid_L10·
@Plesa15 @TIMLEWIS1985 @D_Thon Also if it has hit the camera or wire, why hasn't the ball which has a sensor collecting data 500 times a second, registered anything?
English
2
0
0
988
Aid
Aid@Aid_L10·
@TIMLEWIS1985 @D_Thon No we can't, but we have to look at the data and what it tells us. As thats impartial not the players or coaching staff.
English
5
0
3
4.5K
Tyler van Hensbergen
Tyler van Hensbergen@tvanhens·
@agizzlefizzle12 Translation: I don’t know how to read line graphs but my heart tells me we should have not let the game be played based on my feels.
English
2
0
1
1.1K
Scott
Scott@DatKidScotty·
@TSN_Sports Can someone screen record, video not available in my country
English
2
0
0
228
TSN
TSN@TSN_Sports·
On England's first goal of the match, the ball seemed to hit the cable of a camera. FIFA Media released a statement that the ball sensor did not peak in the sequence. #FIFAWorldCup
English
76
114
929
443.5K

Keşfet

@Mrjamieohara1 @getnickwright @Chelsearory @dkaz @clunk72 @XRL_Veloce @FPLWoofer @Brett_qpr