john

5.3K posts

john

john

@clunk72

sheffield Katılım Aralık 2010
328 Takip Edilen116 Takipçiler
john
john@clunk72·
@DuncanStott That’s why means tested state pensions will be a non starter cause it will affect the public sector retirees more than the private ones The expected level of a private pension recipient will be less than 8k per annum Public sector averages are over 10k The unions won’t like it
English
1
0
0
131
Duncan Stott 🏗️🔰🇺🇦
The public sector workforce gets paid mediocre up-front salaries but are promised gold-plated pensions. It's just another way we push more of today's costs onto future taxpayers.
Stuey Beef 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿@stuey_beef

Retired public sector workers were handed a record £56bn in “gold‑plated” pensions in 2025‑26 – roughly £2,000 torn out of the pocket of every household in the country. Not for schools, not for hospitals, not for policing or defence – for a guaranteed income stream to people who no longer work, under schemes that were never properly funded and never honestly explained to the public. The political class calls this “rewarding service”. What it actually rewards is being on the inside when the deal was written: final‑salary, inflation‑proofed pensions backed by the Treasury, completely insulated from the economic reality facing everyone else. Millions of younger private‑sector workers with fragile defined‑contribution pots, insecure work and no hope of retiring at 60 are being ordered to bankroll comfortable retirements for a state‑sector aristocracy who were promised more than the country ever put aside in cash. This isn’t some accident of history. Governments of all colours signed cheques they knew future taxpayers would have to cash, then buried the true scale of the obligation. Labour now sits on that broken model, refuses to reform it, and pretends the only answer is “tax the rich” – while quietly taxing the young, the renting and the working poor to maintain deals they never voted for and will never receive themselves.

English
46
10
187
21.8K
john
john@clunk72·
@paul_d_stevens @Sandybadders @stuey_beef I’m paying 15% of my salary per year into private pensions and will only get circa 6k from it where the average public sector contributions are between 4% for an similar salary to me rising to 8% for top earners 100k plus per year.
English
0
0
1
9
john
john@clunk72·
@paul_d_stevens @Sandybadders @stuey_beef They changed yes but if you were to stop in the public sector for 30 years of work then you will max out your needed amount to gain the full amount of around 80% of your final salary So if you finish on 50k you will be getting 40k pension All with lower contributions than private
English
2
0
1
18
Stuey Beef 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
Retired public sector workers were handed a record £56bn in “gold‑plated” pensions in 2025‑26 – roughly £2,000 torn out of the pocket of every household in the country. Not for schools, not for hospitals, not for policing or defence – for a guaranteed income stream to people who no longer work, under schemes that were never properly funded and never honestly explained to the public. The political class calls this “rewarding service”. What it actually rewards is being on the inside when the deal was written: final‑salary, inflation‑proofed pensions backed by the Treasury, completely insulated from the economic reality facing everyone else. Millions of younger private‑sector workers with fragile defined‑contribution pots, insecure work and no hope of retiring at 60 are being ordered to bankroll comfortable retirements for a state‑sector aristocracy who were promised more than the country ever put aside in cash. This isn’t some accident of history. Governments of all colours signed cheques they knew future taxpayers would have to cash, then buried the true scale of the obligation. Labour now sits on that broken model, refuses to reform it, and pretends the only answer is “tax the rich” – while quietly taxing the young, the renting and the working poor to maintain deals they never voted for and will never receive themselves.
English
57
197
502
102.8K
john
john@clunk72·
@TimesRadio What happens when banks drop there extras on accounts which are well lower than usual. to keep their margins up for shareholders. No more mobile phone,holiday,life insurance for a nominal fee on your account which all would cost you more to purchase in the open world.
English
0
0
0
109
Times Radio
Times Radio@TimesRadio·
“Banks are making £1 billion a week between them…we think you could tax the banks more fairly and use that to support a social tariff.” Trade Union Congress general secretary Paul Nowak sets out the TUC’s hopes for Burham’s Autumn budget.
English
25
7
19
18.7K
john
john@clunk72·
@implausibleblog Watched fake or fortune on bbc. One minute a woman had a 250k Faberge flower next the same people who said it was worth that amount changed their minds and said it’s only worth 5k your assets and trinkets are only ever an opinion.
English
0
0
0
122
Farrukh
Farrukh@implausibleblog·
Zack Polanski, "The hoarding of assets is causing inequality in the country" "If you're the poorest billionaire in the country with £1 billion, you're making £1 million passive income every week" "That's unsustainable when we have nurses queuing up at food banks"
English
179
1K
3.8K
92.7K
john
john@clunk72·
@curioushaggis So what your saying is who ever is closest to it can claim it. Well there goes your independence as we are closet and we claim Scotland
English
0
0
0
22
Jason Black 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
Just curious,what gives the UK the right to claim to govern a tiny island thousands of miles away? I realise some believe they are entitled to stake their claim on bits of the earth,but it’s 2026, are we still not tightening the rope in terms of how insane we allow them to be?
Jason Black 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 tweet media
English
193
7
30
4.9K
john
john@clunk72·
@PunishedRWR baby boomers are now 80 at the oldest and near 70 at the youngest. So they are now leaving the pension needs as they pass away approx 15 years before most will be gone The next 4 generation had Lower birth rates and all about equal with each other so no difference coming up
English
0
0
0
14
RWR 🥂 🇬🇧 🇸🇪
Me: ''As there is fewer workers for each retiree as society ages, our current pension policies are unsustainable in the long-term'' the response from certain boomers: ''HOW DARE YOU!!! YOU HATE ELDERLY PEOPLE, YOU ARE A MORON WITHOUT A BRAIN. YOU ARE A SATANIC AGEIST!!! 😠😡🤬''
RWR 🥂 🇬🇧 🇸🇪@PunishedRWR

I accept that a higher state pension age is necessary However, what I dont like is how younger generations have to make all the sacrifices whilst Boomers still get triple lock and evade making any sacrifices Sacrifices should be shared across generations

English
11
10
121
6.3K
john
john@clunk72·
@BladeofSpartan @amyalicetattoo Most of the boomers will be exiting the system soon with later generations quite a lot lower. That is not taking integration into account though. So the pension budget should start to drop soon
English
0
0
1
47
Spartan
Spartan@BladeofSpartan·
@amyalicetattoo And what has changed since then to make boomers (the richest demographic in Britain) deserving of decades of welfare?
English
5
0
6
2.6K
john
john@clunk72·
@FacileTalk But he left work at 15/16 and started work straight away. Not spending till his early 20s plodding around education because he was unsure what he wanted to do then take a gap year to find himself only to get a job at Greggs.
English
1
0
0
47
john
john@clunk72·
@SenseSimon Is the question not should we be needing 6 million public sector jobs requiring these pensions. Could we not reduce the liability by reducing the numbers and making them more accountable with productivity
English
1
0
2
434
LouRhodes
LouRhodes@Laura38123422·
@SenseSimon As a public sector employee, I pay nearly 10% (those are the conditions) of my salary into the pension scheme. How does that compare with private sector employees?
English
3
0
3
653
john
john@clunk72·
@JamesMelville The back boom ended in the 60s the next 4 decades saw lower birth rates. So we had more workers paying into the system with less taking out at both ends and now they are exiting the system there will not be as many needing a pension
English
0
0
0
81
James Melville 🚜
James Melville 🚜@JamesMelville·
The social contract has become a gigantic piss take. We pay national insurance years in advance to fund the government, yet the government are taking our tax money and extending the age of the state pension to 68. National insurance and the state pension has become like a Ponzi scheme. Millions of people depend on the state pension from their decades of national insurance payments and yet the government are now intending to push the state pension to an age where many people will struggle to find work. Meanwhile, the government spaff away our tax money on wars, net zero, wealth transfers to corporate contracts and their own massive pensions and expenses. Absolutely shameful.
James Melville 🚜 tweet media
English
170
670
1.9K
30.6K
john
john@clunk72·
@alexmassie The baby boom was over in the 60s and are starting to exit the system now The next 4 decades had lower birth rates so within the next 10 years there will be less and less pensioners. Abit adjusted for immigration.
English
1
0
0
31
john
john@clunk72·
@DomSeaward Tell you what I’ll have my money back that I paid for your education and health up to the age of 18 then I can invest into a pension. 👍👍
English
0
0
0
9
Dominic Seaward
Dominic Seaward@DomSeaward·
Doesn't feel very fair that we are paying towards the state pensions of 67-70 year olds that we will never receive whilst also paying student loans that generation never had to pay.
English
678
386
7.3K
239.3K
john
john@clunk72·
@DavidCavill76 @MarkHeath45 Anyone can set off in a car at 7-50 am yes. Make that 270 mile journey to Devon before the 12-30 pm latest time police say she was killed not a chance. 4 hours 40 minutes to Devon at rush hour that’s the unbelievable part of this story
English
0
0
1
33
David Cavill
David Cavill@DavidCavill76·
@MarkHeath45 Where's the footage of him from Ann widdecombes house? Anyone can set off at 8am in a car! Where's the proof he killed her?
English
3
0
20
678
john
john@clunk72·
@JuniorRodigan @HarriersUSA You’re never looked up into the sky and been confused where something is because the sun or fooodlights have caught your eye. If not you should be a ultimate sports star
English
1
0
5
96
Junior Rodigan
Junior Rodigan@JuniorRodigan·
@HarriersUSA Why is everyone watching for the ball Watch ANDERSON .. his reactions tells us all we need to know that ball didn't fall where it was headed
English
5
0
25
2.4K
HarriersUSA
HarriersUSA@HarriersUSA·
After searching through tons of pixelated and edited videos, this is by far the most clearest replay of the Bellingham's goal for England v Norway in the World Cup. You can clearly see, without doubt, the ball did NOT hit any camera, wire or cable. 👀
English
106
30
349
77.5K
john
john@clunk72·
@SammyAmeobiOBE @HarriersUSA Every ball sport from football American football base ball tennis to cricket. The trajectory of the ball can be different to what you expect based on how it’s kicked Or thrown To say it didn’t do what you think it should have is wrong you just need to watch the Roberto Carlos FK
English
1
0
0
47
SammyAmeobiOBE
SammyAmeobiOBE@SammyAmeobiOBE·
@HarriersUSA you can't see that clearly. however what you can see is the ball's trajectory on the up is not equal to the trajectory on the down.
English
2
0
1
360
john
john@clunk72·
@VincentJCurtis1 Why is nobody over here talking about the fact we are in an El Niño period. Which is proven to increase sea levels and reduce hurricanes both of which we are currently experiencing. Which have always happened for many years.
English
0
0
0
8
Vincent J. Curtis
Vincent J. Curtis@VincentJCurtis1·
CO2 does not cause bad weather. There's no trend in extreme weather events. This year is even quieter than last in terms of Atlantic hurricanes. There's no theory that connects CO2 to weather events.
Vincent J. Curtis tweet media
English
27
16
57
1.4K
john
john@clunk72·
@LedburyGas @listenclosely82 I’ve watched robeto Carlos smash that goal in 20 odd years ago and I can’t tell you how he did it. And I’ve never seen anyone do similar ever again. Balls in many sports don’t fully go where you expect.
English
0
0
0
8
Ledbury Dan
Ledbury Dan@LedburyGas·
@listenclosely82 For sure. They'd have looked at the sensor and that would have been it I expect. I've seen a video of the path of the ball and it does appear to deviate, but not wildly and still into England's half with plenty of Norwegians in defence. It's not a massive scandal.
English
5
0
0
234
Ledbury Dan
Ledbury Dan@LedburyGas·
So nearly a full day after the game and it still isn't clear if the ball hit a camera wire. Norwegians saying it should have gone to VAR. How long did you want that game to last? It landed in England's half anyway. Take the L and move on.
English
11
1
28
3.4K
john
john@clunk72·
@andydaviesref So the next defender stepping in front of an attacker to shield the ball out for a goal kick is also committing a foul on that logic.
English
1
0
3
218
Andy Davies | Everything VAR
#NORENG …..DJed Spence penalty incident was the best example of an attacker creating contact by stepping the defender’s natural running path to win a penalty as opposed to there being a foul action by the defender. Positive VAR intervention #VAR
English
209
9
177
51.6K