PoliceOnGuardForThee

Artur Pawlowski is the well-known Calgary pastor who has championed religious freedoms throughout the overreaching enforcement efforts of the Covid pandemic, and continues to fight numerous legal battles, refusing to back down from the inalienable rights promised to all Canadians. In one such case we have seen a significant development for transparency and accountability in Canadian policing. This lawsuit, brought by Pastor Pawlowski and his brother Dawid, name the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), Calgary Police Service, Alberta Health Services, the City of Calgary, former police chief Mark Neufeld, correctional authorities, and Canada Post, claiming these agencies abused their authority through a pattern of intimidation tied to pandemic-related church services and protests. The Alberta court has ordered the RCMP to disclose the identity of its “disclosing officer”. This ruling, issued following a May 13 appearance before the Alberta Court of King’s Bench, represents a partial victory as they seek redress for what they allege were targeted harassments, arrests, and coordinated enforcement actions during the Covid pandemic. Pastor Pawlowski has long been a vocal advocate for religious freedom, freedom of expression, and the right to peaceful assembly; all core protections enshrined in sections 2(a), 2(b), and 2(c) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The May hearing focused on pre-trial disclosure. While the judge deferred a decision on the CBSA name disclosure pending a summary dismissal application under the Customs Act’s limitation period, the court found no such barrier for the RCMP. They were ordered to provide the name of their disclosing officer within 30 days. This step is crucial, as it could open the door to identifying officials allegedly involved in investigations and enforcement actions that Pawlowski’s legal team argues infringed on fundamental Charter rights. His lawsuit seeks not only personal accountability but also to affirm that no Canadian should face coordinated state pressure for exercising religious beliefs or participating in peaceful protests. Earlier this month Pastor Pawlowski shared an update from his lawyers, stating that the team is “making progress and moving forward” in the lawsuit. The 30-day RCMP deadline has passed, and the case remains active, with further proceedings expected on both the RCMP and CBSA fronts. While no major updates have been released yet, the disclosure order itself underscores the judiciary’s role in ensuring government transparency when citizens challenge potential overreach. This case represents an important test of Charter protections against perceived institutional bias. Successful disclosure could strengthen their ability to prove systemic targeting, further reinforcing the principle that government agencies must operate within constitutional bounds. It further serves as a reminder that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is not merely symbolic but a living document that empowers citizens to hold government and authorities to account. For Pastor Pawlowski, and others who resisted pandemic restrictions on faith and assembly, the fight continues in the courts, defending the freedoms that define Canadian democracy. As always, we stand in full support of Artur and his legal team.

Update on a case we’ve posted about in the past. You can read more about the details of this case on the JCCF website; x.com/jccfcanada/sta…

The Covid Reckoning That Never Came Despite bombshell official Covid vaccine hearings by Senator Ron Johnson and Tulsi Gabbard releasing declassified Covid virus origin documents there has been virtual silence from our media and institutions. The silence proves the psyop. @eddowdbeyondthenarrative/note/p-206406808?r=12542m&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">substack.com/@eddowdbeyondt…

BREAKING NEWS Charter victory for free expression in Ontario. The Ontario Divisional Court has ruled that the Ministry of Transportation violated George Katerberg's freedom of expression by refusing permission for his political billboard criticizing government Covid policies. The Court found that government officials cannot prohibit content on billboards just because it is political. More information to follow.

Bills C-22 (Lawful Access Act) and C-34 (Safe Social Media Act) are expected to dominate debate throughout the summer as concerns grow over privacy, surveillance, and free expression. Marty Moore (@CanConLaw), a constitutional lawyer funded by the Justice Centre, warns the bills reflect an “increasing desire of the current federal government to police expressions online they view as hateful.” When Parliament returns, the effort continues to protect the privacy rights of Canadians. catholicregister.org/item/4057-more… Take action today: sign our pre-written letter campaign to stop Bill C-34: jccf.ca/stop-bill-c-34…

In a powerful victory for the rights that define us as Canadians, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has ruled that the Parliamentary Protective Service (PPS) in Ottawa violated the Charter protected rights and freedoms of the Campaign Life Coalition (CLC), by banning their graphic pro-life signs from a Parliament Hill press conference in May of 2023. Justice MacLeod’s reasoning, released in June, made clear that this was no minor operational call. The PPS’s decision breached Section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms which explicitly protects our freedom of expression and could not be demonstrably justified under Section 1. At its core, the ruling celebrates a principle we should never take for granted; Canadians have the right to speak plainly and forcefully about the issues that matter most, even when the message is raw, graphic, or deeply unpopular. The Campaign Life Coalition had organized the event the day before its annual National March for Life. Participants wanted to show what they see as the stark reality of abortion through images of fetal remains, hoping to reach lawmakers and fellow citizens with a moral and political argument. PPS officers inspected the signs and declared them “too graphic,” invoking Parliament Hill rules against obscene, hateful, violent, or (since 2023) bloody content. While the group complied with the decision of the PPS, they also refused to stay silent on the matter, launching a Charter challenge through the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF). Justice MacLeod found that Campaign Life Coalition’s message was securely protected. The signs conveyed a viewpoint on a contested public issue, and Charter protection does not depend on whether the images are comfortable to look at or are universally accepted as accurate. Citing a Supreme Court precedent, the court reaffirmed that even disturbing or unpopular speech deserves safeguarding. Content alone cannot strip away that protection. Under the Oakes test the PPS restriction collapsed. It was vague and arbitrary, based on one officer’s subjective reaction rather than clearly defined standards. No specific evidence showed harm to bystanders or vulnerable people at the event. The limit was disproportionate to any legitimate goal of preserving dignity or safety on Parliament Hill. As the court recognized, tolerating even shocking expression is the price of a free and democratic society, and Parliament Hill, of all places, should remain open to robust protest. The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms celebrated the outcome. Constitutional lawyer Hatim Kheir explained it plainly, stating “Parliament Hill has long been a place where Canadians gather to communicate political messages directly to lawmakers and to the public. We are pleased that the Court recognized that constitutional freedoms cannot be restricted through subjective and unpredictable censorship.” This decision is more than a win for one organization. It is a clear reminder that the Charter exists to stop government officials from deciding on the spot and by their own taste, which messages Canadians are allowed to share in the heart of our democracy. Parliament Hill belongs to the people. It must remain a genuine forum for open, and even uncomfortable, debate, not a sanitized space policed by subjective judgment. That is the truth of what our rights demand, and what this ruling correctly upholds. As citizens of this beautiful country, must continue to stand strong for the rights and freedoms of all Canadians, and support those leading the charge. To read the Ontario Superior Court decision posted on the JCCF website, click the link; jccf.ca/wp-content/upl…

If you receive a government demand letter seeking the removal of your online content, submit a request for legal representation to the Justice Centre. Here is the link to submit a request for legal representation; jccf.ca/get-help/

They lied about crime, about attempted arson, about disrespecting the War Memorial, about desecrating the Terry Fox statue, about truckers being rapists, about Russian interference, about foreign funding, about middle class Canadians being right wing terrorists, they lied about invoking the Emergencies Act, and the former Finance Minister/Deputy PM giggled like a school girl when she announced she was freezing bank accounts and canceling insurance without due process, parliamentary oversight, or an order from a judge.

Not parody: Meet our new Minister of Misinformation. She will be the in charge of state surveillance & the punishment of speech. We are becoming the UK: The government is the accuser. The government is the judge. The government is the executor. The government decides what speech is allowed. The Liberals purposely redacted what tools they plan to use. And there will be no threshold for what triggers legal action. Nor will there be independent oversight of the accuracy of what THEY call misinformation. They want to use your tax dollars, so they can sue you. Using government lawyers, for what you post online. TWO WEEKS AGO CARNEY PASSED BILL C22, GIVING CABINET SECRET ACCESS TO YOUR DATA. THIS WEEK JOLY TELLS YOU WHAT THEY PLAN TO DO WITH IT. We were called conspiracy theorists.

Last week, our donors helped us secure two major victories. Crown prosecutors in Nova Scotia withdrew a $28,872 ticket against veteran Jeffrey Evely @JeffEvely for walking in the woods. This followed the major Nova Scotia Supreme Court ruling which found that the province's ban on walking in the woods violated Canadians' right to mobility. All charges against Dr. Frances Widdowson @FrancesWiddows1 were stayed following her arrest at the University of Victoria in December 2025. She attended the campus to discuss with students unfounded claims about unmarked graves at the former Kamloops Indian Residential School. Within minutes of her arrival, she encountered a large protest against her, and police charged her with trespassing. This is a victory for all Canadians exercising their freedom of expression on Canadian campuses. Thank you to every donor and supporter who makes this work possible.

My sentence will be served January 21, 2027 and then it’ll be back to court to start this process all over again. By the time this is over, if it ever truly is, the Ontario taxpayers will be on the hook for around $15M for the prosecution of our case alone. The crown prosecutors are maintaining their pressure to have me imprisoned for 7 years, @ChrisBarber1975 for 8. They also desperately want those intimidation charges to stick. Because I’m very, very scary and shouldn’t be allowed to roam the streets. Anyways, I’m off to the food bank for my volunteer time….

Great news!!!

Bill C-8 IS NOW LAW: Canada’s WARRANTLESS SURVEILLANCE NIGHTMARE Explained!! On June 16, 2026, Bill C-8 (formerly Bill C-26) received Royal Assent and became official. This legislation gives the government sweeping new surveillance powers, including: - Warrantless access to your subscriber data, location, browsing history, metadata, and more - The ability for one minister to secretly order your internet or phone service shut off with no court review - Secret gag orders preventing companies from telling you why your service was cut - Broad powers that could force weakening of encryption Sold to Canadians as a “cybersecurity” bill to protect critical infrastructure, it actually delivers massive new warrantless spying powers and internet kill switches with almost no oversight. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth breaks down exactly what’s in Bill C-8 and what it means for your privacy. Please share this video far and wide because most Canadians still have no idea this just became law!

🚨 BREAKING: John Cusack sends a message of encouragement to Detective Helen Grus after learning of the Ottawa Police coverup surrounding the surge in infant deaths following the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. Detective Grus has been at the centre of a high-profile disciplinary case after asking questions about reports of a significant increase in infant deaths following the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines. She now faces a potential demotion, with an appeal expected to be filed soon. As Helen's story continues to gain attention across Canada and into the United States, let's hope those in positions of ‘authority’ begin to feel the growing public scrutiny. Freedom dies in the dark. For more context on Detective Grus’ case, please see link below: x.com/DaveFreedom4/s…

Every Canadian should be demanding a full investigation into the government’s harmful C0VID response and a comprehensive recovery plan to address the damage it caused. Instead, governments remain silent, hoping no one asks the hard questions or demands accountability. But accountability does not happen on its own. It is our job as citizens to keep speaking up, keep asking questions, and keep demanding that those entrusted with public office answer for their decisions. Thank you @DavidRe09886944 for reminding us what public service means and what those in public office should be doing.

The Justice Centre announces that the Crown has withdrawn the ticket issued to Jeffrey Evely under Nova Scotia’s now-invalidated 2025 “woods ban,” ending enforcement proceedings that had been scheduled to proceed in Nova Scotia Provincial Court on Wednesday, July 22, 2026. Mr. Evely became the first person charged under the province’s sweeping prohibition on entering wooded areas during wildfire season and faced a penalty of $28,872.50. Constitutional lawyer Marty Moore welcomed the decision. “This outcome confirms what should have been clear after the Supreme Court’s ruling: governments cannot continue enforcing penalties that arise from unconstitutional state action,” said Mr. Moore. Mr. Evely welcomed the Crown’s decision to withdraw the ticket, saying, “Rights need to be asserted. That has always been the case. We have a sacred, civic duty to safeguard our inheritance for future generations.” The Justice Centre thanks its supporters and donors for making this case possible. Their generosity enables lawyers funded by the Justice Centre to defend Charter rights and freedoms and ensure that Canadians can challenge government action in the courts. Read the full story here: jccf.ca/crown-withdraw…

The Justice Centre announces that lawyers will appear before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on Thursday, June 25, 2026, to appeal the conviction of peaceful Freedom Convoy protestor Evan Blackman and challenge the trial court’s refusal to consider whether the freezing of his bank accounts violated his rights under section 8 of the Charter, protecting against unreasonable search and seizure, and warranted a stay of proceedings as a remedy. Constitutional lawyer Chris Fleury said, “Freezing someone’s bank account is an extraordinary use of state power. When the government interferes with a person’s ability to access their own money, courts must carefully examine whether those actions respected the protections guaranteed by the Charter.” Read the full story here: jccf.ca/father-whose-b…

Police on Guard wishes to pay our sincere respect to the families, coworkers and friends now grieving the terrible loss of the officers in OPP, Toronto and Montreal. In addition, we send hope for a full and speedy recovery to those still in hospital from recent violence across Canada. Our respect and collective strength go out to each and every one of these officers and their families. The systemic increase in violence across Canada cannot be ignored - the result in doing so is the heartbreaking loss of those charged with keeping us safe. Please stand with us in support of these officers and their families, and in speaking out against these acts of violence.

Join us for a free webinar on Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act Parliament has introduced Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act — legislation that could significantly reshape freedom of expression online in Canada if passed in its current form. The bill proposes broad age-verification requirements, expanded regulator control over online platforms and AI tools, and increased collection of personal data, raising concerns about online privacy, anonymous expression, and access to information. Join the Justice Centre for a free webinar to hear from experts in constitutional law and Charter freedoms and learn what this proposed legislation could mean for Canadians. The event will feature a presentation followed by a live question-and-answer session. When: Thursday, June 25, 10:00–11:00 a.m. MT Where: Online via Zoom Format: An overview of Bill C-34 followed by a live Q&A This event is free, but pre-registration is required. tickettailor.com/events/justice…

The term "metadata" appears only once in the 74-page Bill C-22. Without defining "metadata," the Bill grants government power to order companies to retain Canadians' metadata for up to six months. The Criminal Code defines "transmission data." It does not define the broader term "metadata." Undefined terms should not be the foundation of surveillance powers.