PolySeSouvient / PolyRemembers
11.1K posts

PolySeSouvient / PolyRemembers
@Polysesouvient
Diplômés et étudiants de l'École #Polytechnique, familles de victimes de la tuerie du 6 décembre 1989, qui militent pour un meilleur contrôle des armes











N.S. man sentenced to 6 years for manufacturing 3D-printed firearms: CBSA ctvnews.ca/atlantic/nova-…

Sandra Cobena on Conservative's 'Stand on Guard' proposal: "When someone has knowingly and unlawfully entered your home, then the force that you use, that you deem reasonable ... to defend yourselves and your family, is considered reasonable, unless there's evidence that says otherwise."

If someone threatens you or your loved ones at home, you must be able to defend yourself. The Stand on Guard Act, introduced by MP @SandraCobena_, will protect Canadians’ right to defend their homes and families: conservative.ca/cpc/defend-you…

Conservatives introduce bill to create 'stand your ground' law for home invasions ctvnews.ca/politics/artic…


The road ahead for Canada’s sweeping firearms confiscation scheme is far from clear—and according to one of the country’s most experienced firearms lawyers, the government may soon face a serious political and legal dilemma. In our latest issue of the Canadian Firearms Journal, renowned firearms attorney Guy Lavergne breaks down what could happen next as the federal “buyback” program struggles to gain compliance across the country. Drawing on real data from the program’s rollout—where compliance is strikingly low—Lavergne explores the very real possibility that Ottawa may not have the resources, legal capacity, or political support to enforce mass confiscation on hundreds of thousands, to possibly millions, of Canadian firearm owners. Lavergne is widely regarded as one of Canada’s leading legal minds on firearms law. He has represented the National Firearms Association in major constitutional and firearms cases and has appeared in proceedings connected to the Supreme Court of Canada. His work has contributed to significant legal victories for Canadian firearms owners, including successful challenges related to Chief Firearms Officer authority and participation in high-profile firearms cases involving sentencing and regulatory overreach. In this analysis, Lavergne examines the government’s realistic options if widespread non-compliance continues—from criminal prosecutions and licence revocations to amnesty extensions, political delays, or even a quiet rollback of the program through grandfathering provisions. He also outlines the enormous logistical, legal, and political hurdles the government would face if it attempted to enforce the confiscation at scale. This is one of the most detailed legal examinations yet of what may actually happen if Canadians simply refuse to comply—and why the outcome may ultimately be decided as much by politics as by law. This article is so important that we’ve made it available to read on our website. However, for the full issue of the Canadian Firearms Journal—and access to more in-depth legal analysis, advocacy, and expert insight—you must have a membership with Canada’s National Firearms Association. We extend our sincere thanks to Guy Lavergne for his contribution and his continued work defending the rights of Canadian firearms owners. If you want to understand what may really happen next in Canada’s confiscation program, this is an article you won’t want to miss. Link: nfa.ca/now-whats-goin…






