Memedoff

5.4K posts

Memedoff

Memedoff

@Ponzi_machine

Katılım Ekim 2010
3.3K Takip Edilen588 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Memedoff
Memedoff@Ponzi_machine·
Bitcoin debacle will come from 1 out of those 3 (or a combination of them): 1) Binance gets raided 2) Microstrategy hits a deadend 3) Tether has a bank run
English
1
0
4
1.4K
Memedoff
Memedoff@Ponzi_machine·
@JRobFromMN Yeah now compare your symptoms to having 200kg and your whole body destroyed by obesity. Medications is all about risk and reward, your case most likely wasn't someone actually needing the medicine.
English
0
0
0
121
Jason Robertson
Jason Robertson@JRobFromMN·
My Wife and I were prescribed Ozempic a few years ago because of our Diabetes We were on it for a year or two and the experience was less than Ideal Basically it makes you not want to eat...and when you start eating, it makes you feel full much quicker than normal,(meaning that if you just controlled yourself and didn't eat as much, you would have many of the same results, but that is easier said than done) However, we found that the stomach/digestive issues were a real problem and at the same time my wife developed some pretty severe anxiety issues As part of solving that, she quit taking it and I quit taking it as well....her anxiety started to clear up and I noticed that my "brain fog" was lifting...and I didn't really even know I had it but I felt way more clear I suspect that in 10-20 years as more data is gathered, we will see some pretty wild side effects as laid out in the below thread... Not medical advice, but if you are looking at taking it, I would proceed with caution...
Jason Robertson tweet media
A Midwestern Doctor@MidwesternDoc

Bill Maher reveals what CEOs are privately concerned about with employees on Ozempic. MAHER: “I’ve been hearing this on the low for a while.” KARA SWISHER: "On the low. From who?" MAHER: “I’ll tell you after the show. Somebody [in Big Tech] you would know... He’s been hearing, and in his company also, they don’t like their employees on this stuff because—” KARA SWISHER: “Oh, they don’t work hard enough for the man?” MAHER: “They don’t. It takes away your craving for food and maybe substance abuse...” “...Also kind of for success, and sometimes for living and for being motivated. They get kind of logie.”🧵

English
384
149
2.1K
2.4M
Memedoff
Memedoff@Ponzi_machine·
@RosaneBonoro Faltou a parte que algum americano maluco pega uma ar-15 e te metralha num mass shooting
Português
3
0
1
851
Nanibarbosa
Nanibarbosa@RosaneBonoro·
O choque cultural é enorme.
Português
248
259
5.6K
878.3K
Kat
Kat@kat_maryb·
On a dark desert highway, cool wind in my hair
Kat tweet media
English
4.6K
103
2.5K
273.8K
Memedoff
Memedoff@Ponzi_machine·
@ChefReactions This is the first I saw something so disgusting on this account that I would actually not taste it. Not even out of curiosity. That's gross
English
0
0
0
451
RUBU
RUBU@urubullish·
Se esse papo de alienígenas for real, quem seriam os aliens 'tupiniquins'? Só vale chute com imagens… 👇
Português
14
0
15
2.8K
Memedoff
Memedoff@Ponzi_machine·
@MikeZaccardi From 1989 till now you had only 3 independent windows of 10 years..all other rolling windows are dependent and so have no statistical significance
English
0
0
0
50
Memedoff
Memedoff@Ponzi_machine·
@Merridew__ Are you being sarcastic / mocking bag holder or being genuine?
English
0
0
0
198
Memedoff
Memedoff@Ponzi_machine·
@jeremie0117 No relevant mkts are open at this time and you are on the news function of Bloomberg which you could use their website instead
English
1
0
1
83
Jérémie
Jérémie@jeremie0117·
Weekend Grind.
Jérémie tweet media
English
13
11
660
130.3K
Buyback Capital
Buyback Capital@Larryjamieson_·
What’s the best manager/management team you’ve ever seen?
English
40
1
72
40.4K
Memedoff
Memedoff@Ponzi_machine·
@nkreu113r There's lots of companies that seem to have moats that are false positives.. distinguishing the ones that have real pricing power and also selling Microsoft for instance when a company apparently lost its moat is *really* hard. No, you could not totally do this.
English
0
0
0
103
noah
noah@nkreu113r·
The thing that drives me insane is that I could totally do this. Not the part where I get people to let me manage 50 billion dollars, but the part where I generate a vector of trades long the quality and “not rekt by AI” factors. It is funny how much outcomes diverge based on salesmanship and one-of opportunities
Thierry from arvy 🇨🇭@ThierryBorgeat

Chris Hohn did a 90-minute sit-down with Nicolai Tangen and then dropped an investor letter the FT got hold of last week. You’d think the guy who printed a record $18.9B last year would be doing victory laps. Instead he’s quietly rewiring his whole portfolio. My favorite takes from both: 1.The most important thing in investing isn’t growth. It’s barriers to entry. Growth without a moat is the airline industry: 5% volume growth for 100 years and basically zero cumulative profit. 2.There are only about 200 companies on earth he considers high-quality and investable. His fund holds 15. 3.Average holding period: 8 years. Some positions 13. “You have to hold the company forever, because the stock market may be at very bad prices when you want to sell.” 4.His real test for a moat: can the company price above inflation? A 20% margin business that prices 1% above inflation grows profits 5% faster than revenue. Forever. Almost no companies can do this. 5. Industries he won’t touch: banks, autos, retail, insurance, tobacco, asset managers, fossil fuel utilities, airlines, wireless telecom, media, advertising. On banks: “sooner or later someone without a lot of intelligence comes to run them, and then it can be toxic.” 6.On AI generally: call centers go bankrupt. Indian outsourcing coders are next. But for everyone else, AI lowers costs and raises productivity. Companies with real moats become MORE valuable. 7. Here’s the punchline. The FT got hold of his investor letter. He cut his Microsoft stake from 10% of the fund to 1%. Roughly $8B sold. He’d held it since 2017 through a 400% rally. His reason: AI could disrupt Office and Azure faster than the market thinks. 8.He moved that capital into Alphabet. Doubled it from 3% to 5%. Now his largest tech position. The world’s best quality investor sold Microsoft and bought Google because he thinks Google’s moat is more durable in an AI world. Not the consensus trade. 9.The underlying thesis: “AI eats software.” If AI agents do the work humans used to pay per-seat SaaS licenses for, the whole SaaS model gets re-rated. Oracle, Adobe, Salesforce all ~40% off highs. Microsoft 25% off. Market is starting to agree. 10.When to sell? Not when something gets expensive. When conviction drops. Valuation is one variable, conviction is the other. What kills you isn’t being wrong, it’s permanent loss of capital. 11.He admits hardcore activism doesn’t work anymore. Too much of the shareholder base is passive index funds. And even when activism wins, you usually win in a bad business. “The business always wins.” 12.Counterintuitive take: there are more good companies in public markets than in private equity. The best businesses are too big for PE to buy. And when public companies sell something to PE, they’re selling the assets they want to get rid of. 13.On intuition: “thinking without thinking.” Pattern recognition from 20 years of reps. It’s how he sniffed out Wirecard while the German establishment was defending it. “Most investors trust authority too much.” 14.He basically stopped shorting. “You’re going to be eventually right but not be able to fund the losses.” The first guy to short Wirecard had to cover 19 years before it hit zero. Buffett told him he and Charlie studied shorting and concluded it was too hard. 15.He gives almost everything away. ~$500M a year. $10 prevents an unwanted pregnancy in Africa. $40 saves a child from severe malnutrition. $50 prevents permanent blindness. 16.Tangen asks: advice to young people? Hohn, who runs the world’s most profitable hedge fund: “Go on a spiritual path.” The guy who made $18.9B last year ends the interview saying only purpose and meaning matter. The headline: the world’s best quality investor just sold his biggest tech compounder because he thinks AI is breaking the moat. Quietly, with conviction, on an 8-year horizon, while everyone else is still buying the AI winners of 2023.

English
12
1
86
46.9K
Memedoff
Memedoff@Ponzi_machine·
@institLPGP @bennpeifert So many red flags..quants are usually introvert nerds..guy paint his nails black, have a Peter pan syndrome.. usually quants are rational right wing, he's an emotional rollercoaster left wing
Memedoff tweet mediaMemedoff tweet media
English
0
0
11
1.1K
Memedoff
Memedoff@Ponzi_machine·
@institLPGP Guy basically said "hey I thought the correlation would be X but then was Y, shit happens.."I was like wtf, that's not how it works buddy
English
1
0
7
1K
Daave “3 and 30” Tepper
I’ve diligenced hundreds of hf’s in my career. invested with the best - de shaw, millennium, appaloosa, bridgewater, viking. never heard a pm spew so much verbal diarrhea. do not excuse what is inexcusable overconfidence and risk management.
English
35
21
720
176.9K
Memedoff
Memedoff@Ponzi_machine·
@macrocephalopod Btw with the recent VOO mkt share gain maybe our grandchildren won't even know what spy was anymore
Memedoff tweet media
English
0
0
5
736
cephalopodshop
cephalopodshop@macrocephalopod·
Objective ranking, in order of most sophisticated to least sophisticated: - ES - E-minis - Spoos - SPX - S&P 500 - SPY
English
40
9
396
54.7K
Memedoff
Memedoff@Ponzi_machine·
@MasterMaliq Islam is like pitbulls..they owner always says "they are not bad" but then again you never saw a beagle killing someone it's always Muslims..you never saw a Buddhist throwing an airplane into a tower
English
0
0
0
5
Maliq
Maliq@MasterMaliq·
Radical Muslims are less than 1% of 2 BILLION Muslims. Yet you people judge the entire religion by the actions of a tiny minority? Be honest you just hate Muslims. Period.
English
7.7K
80
599
1.6M
Rodrigo Becker
Rodrigo Becker@rodrigofbecker·
Na verdade, a Justiça francesa não levou 17 anos para julgar o caso. Nem perto disso. Vejam. O acidente ocorreu em 2009. A caixa-preta foi encontrada só em 2011. A investigação preliminar terminou em 2012. As acusações só foram apresentadas na Justiça em 2019. O processo foi julgado em primeira instância em 2023. O recurso foi julgado pelo tribunal de apelações ontem. Portanto, do início do processo criminal até o julgamento em segunda instância, foram 7 anos. E não 17. Pode-se reclamar da demora nas investigações (era um caso complexo), da demora do estado em processar, da demora de muita coisa no caso, mas o processo não levou 17 anos na justiça. A justiça francesa pode até ser lenta, mas esse caso não prova o ponto.
Augusto de Arruda Botelho@augustodeAB

Reclamamos - com razão - que a Justiça brasileira é lenta, mas vejam que não estamos sozinhos: a Justiça francesa demorou 17 anos para julgar o acidente do voo da Air France. E não foi a decisão final, há ainda recursos a serem apresentados.

Português
15
24
546
67.2K
Memedoff
Memedoff@Ponzi_machine·
@__paleologo Is her what space x is talking about in their s1 when they mention Tam? 28 trillion
English
0
0
0
3.1K