@XVGWhale Backup Account@DomainsVvs
“wE sHaRe thE sAMe iDeALs”
Some of the ideals, as expressed by Western Muslims who aren’t even terrorist affiliated
99% support sharia death penalties, including death for homosexuality(btw permissible for Muslims to mislead liberal nonmuslims on this objective, often resulting in liberals believing Muslims are remotely liberal), death for adultery(well mainly for women, as men can get a second wife without asking their first wife, Islamic scholars don’t even say “no you should talk to your first wife about it before perusing a second wife”, nope their religious teachers tell them it’s their right thus no need to ask), death for apostasy(death for leaving Islam), and death for blasphemy (almost always in context of blasphemy of Muhammad rather than blasphemy of God, like the Christian mother of 4 on death row in Pakistan for sending a disrespectful text message about Muhammad)
So inherent truths about Islam:
More internally socially far right than any other group of people(it’s fine for Islamists to promote left leaning politicians as long as they don’t support stuff like LGBTQ and abortion for their own community, permissible because it’s important for immigration and because policies that encourage behavior for nonmuslims considered by Islam to be destructive is part of lesser jihad)
Virtually unanimously Imans and Islamic scholars are anti-democracy, and believe that democracy can be useful for creating a path towards eventual theocracy
Against freedom of speech(the death for blasphemy part, also usually winds up being laws to oppose Islamic form of government)
Against freedom of religion (in Saudi Arabia and Somalia for example, illegal to built a church or mosque. Some countries like Saudi Arabia have the death penalty for converting to Christianity or Judaism or Buddhism- literally any religion besides Islam. In Somalia forbidding propagating any other faith in any other way is just part of their constitution, which is how they maintain 99.9% Islamic population - not safe to be openly agnostic or something like that as that’s blasphemous and also would be considered treason against Islam. Jordan, where John the Baptist lived is a little less strict than some Islamic countries, so you just lose custody of your children if you convert to Christianity and get baptized - though Muhammad’s direct teaching is to kill anyone who changes their religion from Islam. And obviously, like in Pakistan, can be the death penalty to insult Muhammad and deny his status as a prophet.)
And also racist, will post another video, from West Bank which isn’t under Hamas, but just random civilians saying the solution is to either kill or oust the Jews, and not allow people of Jewish ethnicity or Jewish faith to be permanent residents (people who don’t understand should see what happened to the Jewish residents of what became Medina, like Banu Qurayza, ended in beheading or slavery for 100% of them after they surrendered to the Muslims. This is why Jewish people needed to defend themselves because Islamists were all like well - the Sunnah says killing the Jews is “the cause of Allah”)
Anyway, are his ideals fascism? Are his ideals no freedom of speech? Are his ideals totalitarian government system? Are his ideals killing the gays? Are his ideals killing women for adultery? Are his ideals killing for leaving Islam? Are his ideals no basic freedoms of religion where Jesus grew up?
