Hadrien Pouget

The Science of AI Is Too Important to Be Left to the Scientists. In a new opinion piece for Foreign Policy I explain why I’m worried for the UN’s new “Independent International Scientific Panel on AI”. (link in reply)

Can AI agents conduct advanced cyber-attacks autonomously? We tested seven models released between August 2024 and February 2026 on two custom-built cyber ranges designed to replicate complex attack environments. Here’s what we found🧵

📈 Today, we’re releasing our first Frontier AI Trends Report: evaluation results on 30+ frontier models from the past two years, showing rapid progress in chemistry and biology, cyber capabilities, autonomy, and more. ▶️Read now: aisi.gov.uk/frontier-ai-tr…

Carnegie is hiring fellows or senior fellows to work on tech policy, particularly AI geopolitics, governance, or global south issues.

Great points from @PougetHadrien here on int'l AI talks at the UN. Without stronger political involvement, they'll likely flounder, regardless of how much technical expertise they muster.

Check out the article here: foreignpolicy.com/2024/10/21/the…

The Science of AI Is Too Important to Be Left to the Scientists. In a new opinion piece for Foreign Policy I explain why I’m worried for the UN’s new “Independent International Scientific Panel on AI”. (link in reply)

What can we learn from previous experiences in climate change, biodiversity, and AI? And why might UN member states still prefer to go down the wrong path? Read my article on the FP website, or feel free to reach out if you need help accessing it.

For the findings to reach and bind decisionmakers, the scientific process must include them. It's harder and messier – but if the UN does not do it, no one can.

How is France approaching its "AI Action Summit," the successor to the UK's AI Safety Summit? Check out my new analysis! I explore France's unique position, and offer thoughts on how it might make the summit a success. carnegieendowment.org/posts/2024/07/…

Should AI models be “open” or “closed”? Today Carnegie joins with leading voices from across the spectrum to help advance this historically fraught debate. Our paper tries to identify emerging common ground and to highlight key unanswered questions: carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/…

Moving from high-level AI regulations to implementation & compliance is going to be really hard. @PougetHadrien & Ranj Zuhdi's great new piece lays it out for 🇪🇺 AI Act, w/ detailed examples from product safety standards + why it'll be far harder for AI. carnegieendowment.org/2024/03/05/ai-…

That being said, the EU shouldn't do nothing - this is a unique chance to lead the world on a critically important issue. I'm very excited to see what comes out of the negotiations! 16/16

Allowing for evolving definitions, risks profiles, and standards is important - both to continue to meet the challenges AI will bring, and to stay aligned with the international community. 15/n

A new piece from me looking explaining why Monday's 🇺🇸EO on AI will be important for the 🇪🇺EU's ongoing AI Act negotiations. The article explains the big picture. In this🧵 I'll draw out bits of the EO that the EU should pay particular attention to. 1/n carnegieendowment.org/2023/11/01/bid…