
Aquinas is our own source!
Sasse makes a really important point here:
"Lutheran theology differs from Reformed theology in that it lays great emphasis on the fact that the evangelical church is none other than the medieval Catholic Church purged of certain heresies and abuses. The Lutheran theologian acknowledges that he belongs to the same visible church to which Thomas Aquinas and Bernard of Clairvaux, Augustine and Tertullian, Anthanasius and Irenaeus once belonged. The orthodox evangelical church is the legitimate continuation of the medieval Catholic Church, not the church of the Council of Trent and the Vatican Council which renounced evangelical truth when it rejected the Reformation" (Here We Stand, p. 102).
So Thomas isn’t “theirs” in contrast to “ours.” He belongs to the Church.
The real question isn’t ownership, but truth. Where Thomas speaks according to the Gospel, we receive him. Where he doesn’t, we correct him—just like we do with any other theologian.
That said, I agree we shouldn’t let Thomas become the center of everything. The Lutheran tradition needs to speak in its own voice (Chemnitz, Gerhard, etc.). But that’s not because Thomas belongs to Rome—it’s because the Gospel is the norm.
Honestly, the bigger problem is conceding that Rome owns the pre-Reformation tradition. That’s the one thing Sasse just won’t let you do.
English

















