Pranav Arora

5.1K posts

Pranav Arora banner
Pranav Arora

Pranav Arora

@PranavAroraa

Advocate, Supreme Court Of India | Karmaveer Chakra Award 2017 Instituted By UN and iCongo| Pramerica Spirit Of Community Award 2013

Katılım Eylül 2017
806 Takip Edilen758 Takipçiler
Pranav Arora
Pranav Arora@PranavAroraa·
Do you mean to say that a person aggrieved by an impugned order should resort to boycotting the judicial process, rather than file an appeal against an unfavourable order? This ought to have been avoided. If aggrieved, the proper course is to follow the legal procedure.
DNA@dna

#ManishSisodia has written to Justice #SwaranakantaSharma following #ArvindKejriwal, stating that no lawyer will represent him and expressing a lack of faith in the judicial process. He said he sees little hope for justice and hinted at adopting a Satyagraha-style protest, further intensifying the political and legal tensions around the case.

English
0
0
0
29
Pranav Arora
Pranav Arora@PranavAroraa·
@LeherSethi I agree! I was expecting too much from people sitting on constitutional positions.
English
0
0
1
14
Pranav Arora
Pranav Arora@PranavAroraa·
Pending disqualification proceedings should not have been rendered infructuous by first recognising a ‘merger’ Adjudication ought to have preceded such determination. A hurried recognition defeated the Tenth Schedule’s anti-defection mandate. @SanjayAzadSln @VPIndia
SansadTV@sansad_tv

Rajya Sabha Chairman approves merger of 7 AAP MPs with Bharatiya Janata Party; BJP's tally now rises from 106 to 113. MPs Raghav Chadha, Ashok Kumar Mittal, Harbhajan Singh, Sandeep Kumar Pathak, Dr. Vikramjit Singh Sahney, Swati Maliwal and Rajinder Gupta, who quit AAP to join BJP on 24th April, are now listed among the 113 Rajya Sabha MPs of BJP. @VPIndia @raghav_chadha @DrAshokKMittal @Harbhajan_bhaji @SwatiJaiHind @Rajinder_Gupta @BJP4India

English
0
0
1
85
Pranav Arora
Pranav Arora@PranavAroraa·
ADM Jabalpur 2.0 Don’t forget @sardesairajdeep ,the role of Supreme Court during the Emergency!
Rajdeep Sardesai@sardesairajdeep

IMPORTANT: several election duty officers in Bengal don’t find their names on the rolls! What does SC say? Justice Bagchi: , “This election, we understand. More valuable right to remain on the rolls, we will examine.” EXAMINE, your Lordship? By the time you examine, elections will be over! Straight Bat Replug on how EC and SC have let down Indian citizens. Right to vote is NOT a post dated cheque your Lordships! youtu.be/UglLSPjmyaQ?si…

English
0
0
0
52
Pranav Arora
Pranav Arora@PranavAroraa·
ADM jabalpur 2.0
Bar and Bench@barandbench

#BREAKING Election duty officers move Supreme Court saying they themselves are not on West Bengal #SIR List Se Adv MR Shamshad: These are 65 petitioners who are on election duty. Their duty orders mention EPIC numbers. Now those numbers are deleted. Now the persons conducting elections cannot vote ! This is on the face arbitrary. Many not given reasons. CJI: Make these arguments before the appellate tribunal. Let the tribunal look into it Justice Bagchi: Appropriate orders will be passed by the tribunal .. this election yes perhaps they can't vote. The more valuable right to remain on the rolls shall be preserved.

Indonesia
0
0
0
41
Pranav Arora
Pranav Arora@PranavAroraa·
Political Party is the "superior" body. The Legislature Party is merely its "offspring." Letter from the "offspring" (the 7 MPs) cannot be used to declare the "parent" (AAP) as merged Chairman is legally bound to verify if the AAP Executive actually passed a resolution to merge
NDTV@ndtv

🔴#BREAKING | RS Chair to approve merger of 7 AAP MPs in BJP, merger to conclude today NDTV's @AkhileshSharma1 joins @reetksahni with more details

English
0
0
0
85
Pranav Arora
Pranav Arora@PranavAroraa·
@sanket Paragraph 4(2) cannot exist in a vacuum; it is a qualifier to 4(1), not a substitute for it. The wording in Paragraph 4(2) is: "the merger... shall be deemed to have taken place if, and only if, not less than two-thirds... have agreed."
English
0
0
1
396
Sanket Upadhyay
Sanket Upadhyay@sanket·
This is what the law says on merger. Para 4 Schedule 10. AAP will highlight Para 1. Raghav Chaddha + 6 and BJP will highlight para 2.
Sanket Upadhyay tweet media
English
47
19
104
27.7K
Pranav Arora
Pranav Arora@PranavAroraa·
@sanket Even in the Maharashtra judgment (2023), SC made it clear: Legislators cannot hijack the party and claim legitimacy. The political party outside the House remains central to determining a valid merger.
English
0
1
1
704
Pranav Arora
Pranav Arora@PranavAroraa·
@sanket Exactly! Even the Supreme Court in Shrimanth Balasaheb Patil (Karnataka, 2019) & reiterated in Subhash Desai (Maharashtra, 2023): The “merger” exception must be interpreted strictly to prevent abuse of the anti-defection law.
English
0
0
0
591
Pranav Arora
Pranav Arora@PranavAroraa·
The term 2/3rd has been much widely used these days. Remember: 1. 2/3rd was required to pass the 131st Constitutional Amendment Bill, 2026 2. “2/3rd” Members of Parliament from AAP joined the BJP. Ironical.
English
0
0
1
43
Pranav Arora
Pranav Arora@PranavAroraa·
@seemay This is what happens when parties reward Rajya Sabha seats for short-term gain. Loyalty is rare—and the result is a monumental loss in Parliament.
English
0
0
0
17
Pranav Arora
Pranav Arora@PranavAroraa·
In the Maharashtra judgment (2023), SC made it clear: Legislators cannot hijack the party and claim legitimacy. The political party outside the House remains central to determining a valid merger.
English
0
0
1
18
Pranav Arora
Pranav Arora@PranavAroraa·
Supreme Court in Shrimanth Balasaheb Patil (Karnataka, 2019) & reiterated in Subhash Desai (Maharashtra, 2023): The “merger” exception must be interpreted strictly to prevent abuse of the anti-defection law.
English
1
0
0
26
Pranav Arora
Pranav Arora@PranavAroraa·
You have several legal ways available : 1. File disqualification petitions before the Rajya Sabha Chairman under Para 2(1)(a) for voluntarily giving up membership. AND (Contd.)
Sanjay Singh AAP@SanjayAzadSln

मैं माननीय राज्यसभा सभापति को एक पत्र प्रस्तुत करूँगा, जिसमें राघव चड्ढा, अशोक मित्तल और संदीप पाठक को भारतीय जनता पार्टी (BJP) में शामिल होने के कारण राज्यसभा की सदस्यता से अयोग्य घोषित करने की मांग की जाएगी, क्योंकि यह संविधान की दसवीं अनुसूची के अंतर्गत स्वेच्छा से अपनी पार्टी की सदस्यता त्यागने के समान है।

English
1
0
1
87
Pranav Arora
Pranav Arora@PranavAroraa·
This is what happens (Rajya Sabha split) when you appoint commercial people for short term gains and in return elevate them with a Rajya Sabha seat! No ideology!, No Ground work!, No connect with the People! @SanjayAzadSln @ArvindKejriwal
English
0
0
0
61

Keşfet

@LeherSethi @SanjayAzadSln @VPIndia @sardesairajdeep @sanket @seemay @ArvindKejriwal @elonmusk