Limitless 🇺🇦🇦🇺🇺🇳🇪🇺🇹🇼

@brunomvpcosta @ent_ggupta @marcportermagee Job wise yes. I fail to see how “thinking” will be good enough to get you a job in an ai world. Of course thinkjng is good as a human skill, just will be a useless skill in the job market, if there even is one that humans can access

@Primes6tTest @ent_ggupta @marcportermagee Thinking a useless skill?

The Economist: “We found that graduates in fields more exposed to AI have suffered markedly worse outcomes.”

@TimMcVeigh1488 @K85136890 @LemmeReact @LauraLoomer @MrsErikaKirk What a sad world we live in where you may be forced to do mercenary work just to make ends meet

@K85136890 @LemmeReact @LauraLoomer @MrsErikaKirk What do you do for a living? I can always go to mercenary work. I’ve got a nice resume from the Army as a 18C. Ai is going to kill the tech sector and the jobs that are still existing will be held by H1B jeets working for half the pay.

Damn. I really got that loud mouthed bitch to shut up. The silence has been nice. I’m sure @MrsErikaKirk is enjoying a nice break from being harassed.

@RockChartrand @RBReich Severely flawed take. AI is the only technology capable of making humans themselves uneconomical rather than something else

Funny how every major technological leap is treated as evil right up until society becomes completely dependent on the benefits it creates. Cars destroyed carriage jobs. Computers destroyed typewriter jobs. The internet destroyed entire industries. AI will disrupt jobs too. But the pattern is always the same: higher productivity, lower costs, new industries, and a higher standard of living overall. And notice the framing. When politicians say “AI is being forced on us,” what they really mean is that individuals and businesses are voluntarily adopting tools that make them more effective. Nobody had to force millions of people to use search engines, smartphones, or GPS either. The real danger isn’t technology. It’s political systems trying to freeze progress because some people fear change or want control over innovation.

This monologue from Hannah Einbinder on the show “Hacks” perfectly encapsulates the frustration many people feel about AI. What are your thoughts?

@301663 @colonelhogans @KosSamaras Immigrants just compound the problem even worse. The major problem is our own fellow Aussies blocking new housing everywhere to keep their properties as high in value as possible.

@colonelhogans @KosSamaras Dick, Albo's migrants have almost depleted rental stocks, pushed rents higher thus maintaining inflation and pushed Aussies into cars and tents. Our primary and manufacturing industries are dwindling amongst record business closures, and AI/robotics are reducing jobs.

If only Australia and the world had more humans like @KosSamaras Another example of a Liberal MP whose only experience with diverse Australia is a curry or a kebab. How the ‘grandfathered’ revised migration policy applies in the real world. Migration has never been a single event. It’s usually a family relay across decades. An example. A Greek family in the 1950s might have looked like this: • One brother arrives in Australia in 1954 to work in a factory. • A sister follows a few years later. • A cousin arrives in the mid-1960s and lives with them while finding work. • The family pools savings to bring over the youngest brother. • By the early 1970s, the parents finally migrate. • The youngest brother later returns to Greece for a period, before coming back permanently in the 1980s. That wasn’t “mass migration”. It was staged migration. Family migration. Social migration. The same pattern exists today with Indian, Chinese and other diverse Australians. The first arrival is often a student, skilled worker or sponsored employee. Years later come partners, children, parents and extended family through family reunion pathways. Australia’s own migration data shows this clearly. India is now Australia’s largest source of permanent migration places, while China remains one of the largest sources of family stream and parent visas (Department of Home Affairs). The Department of Home Affairs data for 2024-25 shows: • Indians received more than 48,000 permanent migration places. • Chinese nationals received more than 10,900 family stream places, the largest of any nationality group. • Australia issued 8,500 parent visas and 40,500 partner visas nationally. That matters in the context of Angus Taylor’s proposed policy to restrict permanent residents from accessing various services and welfare supports unless they become citizens. Coalition figures are now saying existing residents would be “grandfathered”. But think about what that means in practice. In the Greek example, the first arrivals might have been protected. But the parents arriving twenty years later? The younger sibling arriving later? Potentially excluded. The family reunion chain breaks halfway through. Apply that to today. An Indian engineer arrives in Melbourne in 2026. His wife joins him in 2028. His parents arrive years later on a parent visa to help raise grandchildren while both parents work. Under a two-tier system, one generation may have access to support structures while another does not, despite paying taxes, living here permanently and being part of the same household. Or a Chinese Australian family where the first arrival becomes a citizen quickly, but ageing parents arriving later remain permanent residents for years because dual citizenship rules or inheritance/property issues in China complicate citizenship decisions. They become permanent contributors to Australia, but treated differently under the system. Migration has always worked through networks, trust and family anchors. Australia’s post-war European migration story and today’s Indian and Chinese migration story are not opposites. They are variations of the same human pattern.

@TrancheDefi Perhaps it’s unknown. But when has utopia ever succeeded in this world. The likelihood is society is worse off

Anyone who thinks AI is akin to the industrial or computer revolution where it creates more jobs that we haven’t thought of, hasn’t completed the thought exercise. There will be new jobs created, the new jobs will also be done by AI agents. The luddites are correct in the fear of AI taking everyone’s jobs. This will happen What is unknown is if society becomes better or worse because of it, people say that jobs give people purpose which is true to a certain extent but they could possibly find purpose in things like sports, art, entertainment instead of plugging away at spreadsheets. some sort of utopia of wealth could emerge where this is possible to do what you love everyday. Personally I don’t sit in front of a spreadsheets thinking that this is the ultimate fulfillment of human satisfaction. I have never once thought “wow golfing every day that sounds horrible.”

@tanyachen AI will just do the new jobs AI creates

The notion that AI will create meaningful new jobs is just false. Sure, there will be interesting new job titles around coding or engineering or even a type of creative direction work. But that talking point is just for billionaires to sell data centers. AI is inherent to repla..

@ShepherdMaxing @elonmusk The analogy with prior technological process sucks. Ok cars made horses uneconomic. Well what happens when AI makes humans uneconomic? This is by far the most transformative and society changing technological revolution.

So the Left wants to stop new economic growth, new jobs, technology, etc. What's new? To those saying AI is bad and will steal jobs... IT IS THE FUTURE. I work in web and application development, there are few more affected by this than people in IT. I'm having to study and learn completely new skillsets because of AI but I accept it. It's similar to when economies migrated from horses to automobiles, it's just part of life. If we don't embrace it... Then countries like China will completely control the industry and we'll lose the opportunity to experience tremendous economic and technological growth and China and other countries will capitalize on it instead. Can you imagine someone trying to stop automobiles, trains, electricity, etc. when they were new technologies because they thought it would disrupt the economy? Some jobs were lost but many more were created and we became far more efficient and productive...

Hmm

@ent_ggupta @marcportermagee A useless skill, yes. At least job wise

@marcportermagee Thinking , reading , writing will be a skill in coming days .

@rwpopulist @jbrredux2 @FirstSquawk Well I hope you’re right. Maybe I’m dooming too much. What do you predict the future of an ai world to be overall?

@Primes6tTest @jbrredux2 @FirstSquawk Where does this steady source of innovation come from? What drives it? If they have these ideas to improve it, why haven't they already done them? Ingenuity in harness code isn't bottlenecked by time and compute resources. And ingenuity isn't a predictable repetitive thing.

HUANG SAYS AI IS THE BIGGEST CAREER OPPORTUNITY OF THIS GENERATION STUDENTS WHO IGNORE AI RISK BEING LEFT BEHIND IN THE JOB MARKET

Why do you keep insisting that it’ll be your money that’s taxed in an ai world when I haven’t said anything resembling that? I literally say levies on corporations and ai firms, you somehow equate that to taxing your meagre earnings of today, which are irrelevant to anything I’ve even said when I’m talking about a future where you have no earnings to even tax. Are you currently an ai ceo, are you currently the head of a billion dollar, future trillion dollar ai firm who will become part of the future supreme elite and you want all the gains of that while you replace every uneconomical human in your company with ai? You lack so much reading comprehension it’s insane.

@Primes6tTest @jackvlloyd Idc what your “first step” will be. Luckily the ten flags in your name aren’t mine so do whatever you want over there. I have faith that I can spend my own money better than the average Australian socialist can spend it.

Only fools and the economically ignorant are against AI data centers.

Because it literally gets better every single day? You’re delusional and you’re lashing out because you secretly know most if not all human labour, including yours, will one day be irrelevant and displaced by ai who can do both a better job than you and cost next to nothing to “employ”

@Primes6tTest @jbrredux2 @FirstSquawk "Why won't this fantastical made up scenario that hasn't happened eventually happen? See, it's going to happen." I don't even know how to respond to this kind of stuff. Why don't you explain why the slop machine *will* get any better?

@jamesdoe1912 Fr the only thing they ever do is make a country worse and we all have to literally suffer the consequences of their bs.

I would round up every leftist and conservative in America and have them starve if I could

Holy imbecile. What money will be taken from you when you will have no ability to make any? My first step would be to figure out levies to put corporate profits above a normal return on capital focussed on land and natural resources, excess profits as companies no longer need to pay for labour displaced by ai, the chip makers, data centres, ai firms, whatever other supply chains most benefit from the displacement etc. what’s clear is you do not understand anything about the future lol. Somehow you think there’ll be any income from humans to tax 😂😂😂

@Primes6tTest @jackvlloyd Considering the government doesn’t have any money it doesn’t take from me and my friends, you certainly did say take my money. How would it prepare? Taking peoples money and giving it to other people? Nah I’m good. Get out of my pockets weirdo

@KurtisTregxj2m @jackvlloyd And just like horses, humans become uneconomical in an ai world. Do you not get that? I never even said take your money, I said for the government to prepare for a world where you have next to no ability to make money 😂

@Primes6tTest @jackvlloyd The same way Henry ford saved me from the horse apocalypse. You’re not gonna convince me that you can take my money for my best interest, I got that under control. You can move on

@KurtisTregxj2m @jackvlloyd And how will the markets protect you from the jobs apocalypse?

@Primes6tTest @jackvlloyd It’s not about the government deciding your shit it’s about *government intervening to decide my shit* in case you didn’t realize, I trust the markets more than the intervention of the week

@cryps1s The question is, is our data safe in your data centres? Is it resistant to data breaches? Quantum encryption? Etc

Your ChatGPT account is one of the most important and valuable digital accounts you'll ever have. Secure it with Advanced Account Security today. openai.com/index/advanced…

It’s not about the gov deciding your shit. It’s about the gov intervening now and preparing for the jobs apocalypse. It needs to confront the inevitable concentration of extreme, extreme wealth to the AI CEOs as labour becomes irrelevant, as the average man loses their source of income ie their labour, to AI and for the government to be able to provide the safety-net. If you want to live in a world where your labour is irrelevant, and at the same time you get absolutely no safety-net in an ai world, whatever bro.

@Primes6tTest @jackvlloyd Take all the time you need. I don’t want the gov deciding my shit, you brought up Altman.

@KurtisTregxj2m @jackvlloyd Genuinely not understanding what ur talking about. Like altmans court case? And why would the primaries have anything to do with getting rid of Altman?

@Primes6tTest @jackvlloyd Yes I would because if he takes a massive L we don’t have to wait Til the primaries to get rid of him

@ajambrosino Defs need to be able to use it while Mac is locked

Thanks for the feedback on Codex in the ChatGPT mobile app. While it’s in preview, we’re working to improve it fast. What you can expect next: push notifications, /fork, ability to restore after revoking, better reconnects, fixing the ability to control other devices, fewer mobile thread errors, better git diff & full-file, no plan mode issues, and lots more polish/bug fixes.

@flowersslop I personally wish I could call it something else entirely. I get branding but could be fun having your own robot with no other company branding

If I were to create one name for OpenAI, that unifies all products like Codex, ChatGPT, and robotics id call it OpenAI Operator. Operating System. Workplace Operator. Operating your life. Operator handles it. Operator SDK. Medical Operator. Operator on device. Robotic Operator.