🤴 Prince Emma_Crypto(🧩/🧩) 💼

I know you weren’t expecting this reply… But maybe Telegram should think about “raising the bar” instead? I get that the blockchain is meant to be decentralized and permissionless, but these projects don’t launch directly on the blockchain. Instead, they use Telegram as a tool to gather users, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing. However, the problem is that many projects are now taking advantage of this. @Telegram isn’t the blockchain, and while @Durov is working on making parts of Telegram more decentralized, it’s still a centralized service with the power to control what projects are launched on the platform. Maybe Telegram should take a similar approach to the App Store or Play Store, where there are strict guidelines for projects to meet before they can launch. For example, projects should be required to show a long-term plan, clear tokenomics, and real utility. If Telegram approves these plans, and the project agrees to follow the rules, then they should be held accountable. If they break these rules, Telegram could step in and ban them. As much as I’m a KOL on TON and sometimes promote these mini apps, you might have noticed that I’ve slowed down on that lately. I get how the community feels, and honestly, I’m also tired of seeing new mini apps launching almost every week, pushing users to make $TON transactions etc. Most of these projects don’t have strong utilities to keep them going after TGE. There are so many examples of projects where the price just kept dropping after TGE because they didn’t have anything meaningful to offer; no demand, no real value. Many of them seem to be focused mainly on gathering users to make money from ads on Telegram, X, and other social platforms, often turning into marketing tools for other projects. It’s just a cycle that keeps repeating. If these projects want to make money from ads or be a marketing tool, they should be honest about it from the start. They need to stop giving the community false hopes about their so-called “utility” tokens that end up being forgotten soon after TGE. Only a small number of mini app projects can actually claim to have strong utilities that users want to use after TGE, and you can see this reflected in their price performance. In summary, I don’t know if this idea is even possible, but I believe @Telegram should step in and put some rules in place for mini app launches. There should be stricter guidelines and requirements for any project that wants to launch on Telegram. If a project doesn’t have a clear roadmap or a strong utility that brings real value to the community, it shouldn’t be allowed to launch. This way, Telegram can protect its users from weak projects, reduce the number of disappointing launches, and ensure the platform is used for quality projects that actually benefit the community. 🫳 🎤 🚶🏽