Andy Grewal

7.6K posts

Andy Grewal banner
Andy Grewal

Andy Grewal

@ProfGrewal

Professor at @IowaLawSchool. Interests: tax law, constitutional law, politics, memes, nonsense. Views mine only.

Katılım Nisan 2023
412 Takip Edilen3.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Andy Grewal
Andy Grewal@ProfGrewal·
My symposium article on Chevron's death and the tax system has been published: "Tax Regulations After Loper Bright," 2024 Mich. St. L. Rev. 1083 (2025) papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
Andy Grewal tweet media
English
2
0
26
7.5K
Andy Grewal retweetledi
Jim Gardner-Johnson
Jim Gardner-Johnson@DatDudeJD·
BAR OWNER: “You’re OK at making drinks, but are you good at changing the channel on a TV?” BARTENDER INTERVIEWEE: “I am the literal worst channel changer of all time.” BAR OWNER: “You start tomorrow.”
English
181
2.8K
69.6K
2.8M
Andy Grewal
Andy Grewal@ProfGrewal·
@gerebit0 Impressive, I guess, but hardly compares to an intense pickleball dink battle.
English
2
0
1
1.1K
Germán R. Abril
Germán R. Abril@gerebit0·
No puedes acabar un partido así. Hay que cerrar el estadio.
Español
154
2.7K
45K
2.4M
Andy Grewal retweetledi
signüll
signüll@signulll·
“can i start you off with an appetizer, maybe 30 tortillas?” “god no, i can’t eat that many tortillas!” “how about if cut them up into triangles, fry them in seed oil, & serve them with some salsa?” “omg that sounds delightful”.
English
205
1.5K
37.2K
863.6K
Andy Grewal
Andy Grewal@ProfGrewal·
@danepps Sometimes I will put in the name of a famous Supreme Court case … and it will seem committed to giving me anything but that case
English
0
0
5
251
Dan Epps
Dan Epps@danepps·
I am continually surprised by how poor Westlaw's interface is and how little it has improved over time. When I type "Cox" into the search bar, the suggestion should be a case w/ that name, not "Litigation Analytics" about how often various judges named Cox grant summary judgment.
Dan Epps tweet media
English
24
12
428
19.1K
Jay Surdukowski
Jay Surdukowski@Jay1043·
@ProfGrewal Lol it’s hilarious and don’t be ashamed / it’s the culture and you are on top of it bud 😆 Hope you’ve been well sir.
English
1
0
15
2.3K
Andy Grewal
Andy Grewal@ProfGrewal·
Just catching up on today’s financial news in the world’s premier business newspaper
Andy Grewal tweet media
English
1
1
27
5K
Andy Grewal
Andy Grewal@ProfGrewal·
@Vermeullarmine @TradVat2 The sad thing is that many “progressives” will read your tweet seriously, and warmly welcome the suggestion
English
1
0
2
418
Andy Grewal
Andy Grewal@ProfGrewal·
Nothing beats a sunny spring day in eastern Iowa.
Andy Grewal tweet media
English
0
0
11
552
Andy Grewal retweetledi
The Name of War
The Name of War@TheNameofWar·
WWII leaders as children
The Name of War tweet media
English
180
454
5K
1.2M
Andy Grewal
Andy Grewal@ProfGrewal·
@OrinKerr @sfmcguire79 I guess a follow up question is how many invites were never extended or were rejected on account of this behavior. I suspect the problem is less serious than during the Great Awokening, but I don’t think it’s gone away
English
0
0
0
121
Orin Kerr
Orin Kerr@OrinKerr·
@sfmcguire79 I’m curious: how long has it been since the last time a speaker at a U.S. law school was heckled/interrupted? Off the top of my head, it seems to be more rare than it used to be.
English
6
1
30
7K
Andy Grewal retweetledi
Michael Warburton
Michael Warburton@For_Film_Fans·
33yr old DOLLY PARTON was still a year away from the superstardom “9 To 5” would bring her but here she is with a song she wrote just for Johnny and proving that you you can still shred a guitar whilst wearing 5-inch nails. A super Superstar.
English
188
969
10.2K
455.6K
Dan Epps
Dan Epps@danepps·
Counterpoint: the Justices are good at figuring out what they think about a case of this magnitude, and Neal’s four coaches had zero effect on the outcome. I don’t think I have ever seen a SCOTUS advocate claim so much personal credit for a win before…yeesh.
Neal Katyal@neal_katyal

Five months ago, I argued against the President's $4 trillion tariffs at the Supreme Court. In 237 years, the Court had never struck down a sitting President's signature initiative. Legal scholars said it was impossible. Some of my own colleagues said it was impossible. We won. 6-3. But the real story isn't what happened in that courtroom. It's what happened in the months before. And its the subject of my TED talk, coming out tomorrow. I had the best legal team in the nation, especially Colleen Roh Sinzdak, the most outstanding legal strategist I know. Huge thanks, too, go to the Liberty Justice Center (and in particular its fearless and hyper-intelligent leader Sara Albrecht), who organized the client small businesses, as well as to the brave small businesses themselves. I also had four teachers preparing me. A mindset coach who'd worked with Andre Agassi. An improv coach who taught me that "Yes, and" works in Supreme Court arguments the same way it works everywhere else. A meditation coach who taught me stillness. And Harvey. Harvey predicted many of the questions the Justices asked — sometimes almost word for word. Brilliant. Tireless. Occasionally insufferable. Here's the catch: Harvey isn't a person. Harvey is a bespoke AI I built over the last year with a legal AI company, trained on every question every Justice has asked in oral argument for 25 years, and everything they've ever written. Tomorrow, TED releases my talk about what really happened — and what I learned standing at that podium. AI can predict. AI can analyze. What AI cannot do is the one thing that actually won the argument. Connect. Read the room. Hear not just a Justice's words, but her worry — and answer the worry. That is the irreducibly human skill. Find yours. Go deeper. In this age of AI, that's where your edge lives. The talk goes live Thursday, May 7 at 11am ET: go.ted.com/nealkumarkatyal What's the irreducibly human skill in your work — the thing AI can't touch?

English
38
49
916
131.2K