Steve Fuller

44.9K posts

Steve Fuller banner
Steve Fuller

Steve Fuller

@ProfSteveFuller

Prof of Sociology, @warwickuni. Founder of Social Epistemology and Author of Humanity 2.0 and Post Truth: Knowledge as a Power Game

University of Warwick Katılım Temmuz 2011
36 Takip Edilen6.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Steve Fuller
Steve Fuller@ProfSteveFuller·
My new book is 'Media and the Power of Knowledge'. It is partly based on lectures I've given over the last 15 years. It updates McLuhan for the age of @X: futurespodcast.net/events/media-p…
English
0
6
22
6K
Steve Fuller
Steve Fuller@ProfSteveFuller·
@Ljiljana1972 I think the idea behind 'Inception' is very smart and more can be done with it. As for the rest of them, perhaps better versions could be done on lower budgets.
English
1
0
1
91
Steve Fuller
Steve Fuller@ProfSteveFuller·
#Habermas totally ruined people's understanding of the Enlightenment. He made its virtues seem much weaker than they really are, while keeping the door open to the sort of total critique launched by Horkheimer & Adorno.
English
0
0
4
236
Steve Fuller
Steve Fuller@ProfSteveFuller·
@carlgomb @Ljiljana1972 Schopenhauer would have loved @X, especially since he's the modern master of the aphoristic style. The question is whether Nietzsche would like or even tolerate @X, notwithstanding some stylistic similarities.
English
1
0
2
48
Steve Fuller
Steve Fuller@ProfSteveFuller·
@Ljiljana1972 But your man Hoyeck probably secretly admires a guy like Parfit..
English
1
0
1
29
Pelagia
Pelagia@Ljiljana1972·
@ProfSteveFuller Quite tired of the stories about mid yet weird philosophers 😄
English
2
0
2
115
Steve Fuller
Steve Fuller@ProfSteveFuller·
This is a very interesting take on a very strange phenomenon: @evansd66/make-hijacking-great-again-6426dea7b6b4" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@evansd66/make…
English
0
0
1
250
Steve Fuller
Steve Fuller@ProfSteveFuller·
Exactly right!
Evonomics.com@EvonomicsMag

Ogilvy Vice Chairman @rorysutherland understands the problem: Milton Friedman, Friedrich Hayek, Joseph Stiglitz, and Paul Krugman have all expressed support for taxing the value of land. A land value tax is one of the rare policy ideas that draws support across the ideological spectrum. The challenge isn't whether it makes economic sense—it's how to introduce it without triggering a revolution. Read more by economist @mmuthukrishna: evonomics.com/how-to-stop-re…

English
1
0
7
1.3K
Steve Fuller
Steve Fuller@ProfSteveFuller·
Interesting. Your interests are what you think makes you interesting to others.
English
0
0
4
375
Carl Gombrich
Carl Gombrich@carlgomb·
I like Tuchel. Never understood why Chelsea got rid of him.
English
1
0
2
163
Steve Fuller
Steve Fuller@ProfSteveFuller·
I was never a sports fan when I lived in the US. And I've never properly learned the rules of (non-US) football. Nevertheless, I'm sure a very decent sociology of the human condition could be done by treating football in all its aspects as a microcosm.
English
2
0
5
511
Steve Fuller
Steve Fuller@ProfSteveFuller·
What's really funny about the so-called 'defenders of science' trying to relitigate the Science Wars from thirty years ago is that they are even more on the backfoot now than they were then.
黒木玄 Gen Kuroki@genkuroki

Sokalさんのパロディ論文を掲載してしまった1996年のSocial Text誌のScience Wars特集号については、同じ号に掲載された論文で科学社会学者のSteve Fuller氏がどれだけ酷い意見を公表し、その後どうなったかを知っておくべきです。 #page335" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/… ↓Gemini翻訳 genkuroki.github.io/kuroki/FN/Full…

English
0
1
4
400
Steve Fuller
Steve Fuller@ProfSteveFuller·
This guy is definitely working for the Russians...
Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱@Kristof_Poland

Voltaire – the fake antidote to Rousseau He is the most entertaining man of the eighteenth century and the most seductive trap in Western intellectual history. He seems like the cure for Rousseau. He is the other half of the disease. 1. Where Rousseau is emotional, Voltaire is rational. Where Rousseau weeps over the noble savage, Voltaire mocks. He is the master of devastating wit, precise irony, surgical ridicule. Candide dismantles every naive optimism in ninety pages with the efficiency of a guillotine – which is fitting, since the guillotine is partly what his work made possible. 2. His great weapon is mockery. Écrasez l’infâme – crush the infamous, meaning the Church, tradition, inherited authority. He crushed it. With wit, elegance, and devastating precision. He was right that the Church was corrupt, that the aristocracy was parasitic, that the old order was indefensible in many of its particulars. Being right about what to demolish is not the same as knowing what to build. 3. Voltaire is the demolition crew without an architecture firm. He tears down, magnificently. He offers no replacement – only rubble, and the advice to cultivate your garden. Private. Disengaged. The conclusion of Candide: after every horror, every injustice, every system failure – grow vegetables. This is not wisdom. This is elegant surrender dressed as philosophy. 4. His irony is a solvent. It dissolves corruption, yes – but it dissolves everything, including the things worth keeping. A civilization marinated in Voltairean irony learns to mock every claim to authority, every appeal to tradition, every invocation of duty. This feels like freedom. It is actually vulnerability – a society that has learned to be ironic about everything is defenseless against the person who believes something earnestly enough to act on it. Robespierre was not ironic. He was a true believer. He won. 5. Rousseau gave the revolutionary the emotional fuel: the pure victim, the corrupt oppressor, the righteous rage of nature against civilization. Voltaire provided the intellectual solvent: he dissolved the legitimacy of every institution that might have contained that rage. Together they cleared the ground completely. Robespierre arrived and found no Church, no tradition, no inherited authority with enough credibility to resist him. He simply moved into the vacuum and filled it with the General Will and the guillotine. 6. And when he wasn’t playing "champion of liberty", he was on the payroll of kings, literally. He spent years at Frederick the Great’s court and corresponded adoringly with Catherine the Great, flattering both in print as enlightened monarchs of the age. While he was writing these letters, Frederick and Catherine were carving up Poland – dismembering a European nation, erasing it from the map and subjugating an entire people in one of the great crimes of the eighteenth century. Voltaire knew. He didn’t care. Écrasez l’infâme — crush the infamous — unless the infamous is paying well and lives in a palace in Berlin or St. Petersburg. 7. The contemporary Voltaire is everywhere: the late night host who dismantles everything with devastating wit and proposes nothing. The enlightened cynic who sees through every institution, trusts nothing, builds nothing, and considers this sophistication – while cashing checks from the very system he mocks. The fake antidote doesn’t kill you. It leaves you without defenses when the real disease arrives. Rousseau is the fire. Voltaire is the man who dismantled your fireplace and called it progress – and then went to warm himself at the tsar’s. Together they produced the French Revolution, with the Terror, and the template for every ideological catastrophe that followed. The most dangerous intellectual partnership in Western history wasn’t a conspiracy. It was two men who despised each other and destroyed the same thing from opposite ends, leaving the ground perfectly prepared for those who came after them with a plan.

English
0
0
1
269
Carl Gombrich
Carl Gombrich@carlgomb·
Weird that @RupertLowe10 won't apologise for his slip about Dunblane. It was, indeed, a slip, but why not apologise as it was clearly a very unfortunate and unpleasant error?
English
7
0
8
838