Pronx | 🎒

Made this inspirational @MadLadsNFT x @xNFT_Backpack video coz @armaniferrante is focking awesome! @jackshaftoes @MonkDoesnt

@GGxSira @marv1nstarr 👀

WOW! @marv1nstarr is so right, Web3 gaming has a trust problem. But that’s only the surface. Here's my additional take: What we’re actually seeing is the aftermath of an unconsolidated cycle. The 2021 cohort is still recovering, while the 2024–2025 wave failed to replace it. Not because of lack of effort, but because the products and narratives weren’t strong enough to bring in true retail. ➡️ We got repetition instead of reinvention. ➡️Incomplete games instead of finished experiences. ➡️Extraction-driven ecosystems instead of cultures worth belonging to. Even the most capitalized ecosystems, from Sky Mavis to Immutable, haven’t fully delivered the next compelling leap yet. So: ❌Just a matter of “showing up early” like in Axie. ✅It’s about delivering something fundamentally better. The next breakout: ❌ A game. ✅ It will be a franchise - a world, a culture, a product that extends beyond crypto and earns global relevance. When that happens, trust won’t need to be rebuilt. It will be reclaimed. And when it is, a large portion of the old cycle returns alongside a much bigger new batch.

They can't handle truth to fill their ego. This man was patient all through out those roller coaster degrading events. What a poor decision

@supermoyy_ @Backpack Lower! Send it to grave

LETS ALL LAUGH AT @Backpack 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂WHAT A TIME TO BE ALIVE🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳

@RealSolKing @MadLads @MadVincent666 @armaniferrante I can name them

Last 5 @MadLads supporters giving pleasure to each other on CT…

Pain 😔

@Potaenamuka FTX 2.0?

Same old pattern, different style, same ending. FTX connections everywhere, even in the US. BP acquiring FTX EU… strong support from Toly… hmm 🤔 Feels like the old guard is still pulling some strings (just my thoughts). Cutting my losses. Sold my LADS today. Bye.

Back... flop 🤧

@js_dun Great thread ser, thanks

@FabianoSolana Face of Solana 🤣

What’s the bull case for Mad Lads? Rode some from $10K to $1K Airdrop disappointed... Still they’re THE one and only face of Solana… But how do you attract new buyers? No VIP on Backpack, no real utility So what’s the plan? Or are they just becoming “culture” like DeGods?

@tristan Time to take over ser

I want to work on something fascinating and really hard.

@creativeburne Smb

thinking of changing my pfp and rebranding - Azuki - MadLads - SMB Gen2 & 3 which one should I pick ?? 👀

Cinema

@firedsol @frankdegods @armaniferrante @y00tsNFT What

No cap @frankdegods delivered for holders. @armaniferrante? Can’t say the same. Frank made bad calls, yeah. But $DUST + @y00tsNFT mint was a whole statement. Degods floor went to 1000 $SOL. Community was printing in many ways with @frankdegods On the other hand we were there. We believed. Armani had everything. The hype, the trust, the culture and still fumbled it. 💀 Bad choices ≠ bad intentions. That difference matters. 🐐

Can you guess the ticker?

We Were Never His Community. We Were His Fundraise. | Full Long Story Let's start with something most people get wrong. @armaniferrante didn't build Mad Lads alone. @tristan co-founded Coral with him, co-founded Backpack with him, and was the person who spent over a year curating the community before the mint even happened. The allowlist process, the culture, the "WAO — We Are One" identity — that was Tristan's work. Him and @monkdoesnt. They made Mad Lads a name that commanded genuine respect across the entire Solana ecosystem. There's something worth noting. FTX collapsed in November 2022. The Mad Lads mint happened in April 2023, months later, as Solana was still trying to find its footing. Looking back, that mint wasn't just a community launch. It was a lifeline. A way to rebuild and fund the exchange Armani actually wanted to build all along. We were the funding round. We just didn't know it at the time. After Tristan and Monkey left, everything that came after is Armani's legacy alone. The community started hollowing out slowly. The Mad Lads Twitter went quiet. Discord went cold. New Backpack employees had zero respect for Lads holders, some distanced themselves publicly, some talked openly about not caring. But Armani kept saying the right things. Community matters. Loyalty matters. So we stayed. Then the Backpack Exchange announcement dropped and we lost our minds, in the best way. We bought more Lads immediately. At that point Mad Lads was genuinely bigger than Backpack as a brand. The name carried more weight, more trust, more recognition. We thought: this is it. We are the face of something that could become the next Binance. Our patience is about to pay off. Then came the Seasons. Trading points, volume based rewards, the promise of a $BP airdrop. Mad Lads holders are not traders, we never were. We are believers, holders, community people. But we didn't want to be left behind. So we tried. We generated volume. Lost real money. And told ourselves: it's fine, TGE is coming, he won't forget us. Season 2. Season 3. Still no utility for Lads. Still no mention of Lads. The only thing we ever received was a fee reduction on the exchange, a benefit built for traders, given to a community of people who aren't traders. By that point, I don't think they thought about us much at all. The signals were everywhere. Mad Lads Twitter stopped posting. Armani became active on Backpack Discord and went silent on Lads Discord. His language shifted from "our community" to "Mad Lads are not our product." When KOLs posted hit pieces on Backpack, who was in the replies defending him every single time? Lads holders. Always. Someone slid into my DMs, an ex-Backpack employee. Said simply: "Lads will not get an airdrop." I dismissed it. We all did. We thought Armani was filtering out farmers. The real ones would be taken care of. He values loyalty, right? We chose to believe that. When people close to the team started posting about "all the airdrops Lads already received," we read between the lines. The message underneath was obvious: you already ate, stop asking. But we held on. When Armani posted "NFTs might be dead but Lads are just getting started" we took it as confirmation. He still sees us. He didn't. Then the snapshot. The tokenomics. The number that made the whole community go silent. One percent. Not for bots. Not for farmers. For the people who had been there from the beginning. Who defended him publicly. Who absorbed trading losses to generate volume for his exchange. One percent for the backbone. The response when the community asked why? Simple. Cold. You already ate. Then came yesterday, one day after the TGE. As community managers have now confirmed, newly traded Mad Lads will no longer receive VIP status on Backpack. If you held before, you are grandfathered in. But anyone buying today gets nothing. No utility. No benefit. No connection to the exchange we spent years supporting. He waited until after the airdrop to quietly close the door. No announcement. No explanation. Just policy. That is not an oversight. That is housekeeping. The community served its purpose, the token launched, and the last remaining thread was cut the very next day. Here is what I believe now. Armani got lucky. He got lucky that Tristan was brilliant at building community culture from the ground up. He inherited loyalty that most founders spend years trying to manufacture. And instead of stewarding it, he extracted it. Quietly, gradually, until there was nothing left to take. Mad Lads was never the goal. Backpack was always the goal. Mad Lads was the vehicle that got him there. Once it served its purpose, it got parked. And the tragic part? It didn't even work. The TGE underperformed. The trader community is fractured. Chinese holders are rising up over witch-hunt accusations. He distanced himself from the community that loved him unconditionally and couldn't hold the one he replaced us with. Mad Lads gave Armani everything. Capital, credibility, cover, and community. We were there when nobody else was. We made Backpack look legitimate before Backpack had earned that on its own. WAO. We Are One. We meant it. He never did.

@ufukdogancrypt @armaniferrante @tristan Thank you for always speaking man

@FabianoSolana Can you confirm?

BAYC went from over $400K to $10K That says everything about the current state of NFTs And most of them have already played their most valuable card: A token

🤣

@GGxSira 👏

Extractive behavior is the real leak in the system. - KOLs, guilds, and DAO-like groups cluster around reward programs. - Gamers (whether investors or scholars) were conditioned to optimize for exit, not enjoyment. - Even “mindshare” became manufactured... Often KOL-directed, not organically earned. But I wouldn’t say Web3 gaming was killed... Right now (and for me) it was put to sleep. 2021 proved something important: earning works as a narrative. ‼️ What’s missing today isn’t the model... ➡️ It’s a concept compelling enough to scale it again. Sky Mavis proved this with Axie Infinity - a breakout that scaled to the masses despite early skepticism from the crypto natives of that time. The next breakout won’t just be a better game. It will be a stronger brand: ... [ 1 ] Native to Web3 but expandable beyond it capable of pulling back 2021 participants and onboarding new ones ... [ 2 ] Culturally scalable across platforms, age groups, and even into media/IP Realistically, this space doesn’t need 10 winners. It needs one. One title that resets expectations: --> reopens long-term capital --> raises the bar for design, funding, and token structures --> and redefines what “investable” Web3 gaming looks like So my question are: ❓ Who builds the first Web3 game that doesn’t just peak in a cycle. but sustains beyond it? ❓ Who creates something that outgrows its token, instead of collapsing back to it?