It was the BLURST of times?!

The E. Jean Carroll case was built almost entirely on hearsay - Carroll’s word + what her friends claimed she told them decades earlier. Clinton-appointed Judge Kaplan even let the 2005 Access Hollywood tape (unrelated to Carroll) be played for the jury! No physical evidence of rape existed. No way to corroborate or refute witness testimony. This testimony would not even have been allowed in a criminal trial! The jury explicitly found: No rape occurred! Only after the verdict did Kaplan declare it was “rape” under some “common definition.” What a clown show. #lawfare Only in New York.

BREAKING: The Supreme Court struck down a majority Black congressional district in Louisiana, weakening a landmark voting rights law’s protections against discrimination in redistricting. apnews.com/article/suprem…

Before the “legal pundits” claim the indictment against Comey is flawed, keep in mind a few things: - A Grand Jury disagrees. - Professional prosecutors disagree. - DOJ and @DAGToddBlanche disagree. - Comey made many inconsistent statements about what he thought the shells meant. - Non-public evidence exists to prove that Comey knew what “8647” meant. There is no doubt that subpoenas went to Comey’s cell and email providers. Within those returns could be admissions he knew what it meant but perhaps was “just joking”. That sort of reckless disregard of the public perception of the threat is exactly the evidence that takes this BARD. Also, Comey spent a lot of time publicly pontificating about what “86” means. He called the shell formation “clever”and “cool”. Wondered with his wife what it meant. Menus? Leaving a place? Few North Carolina jurors will consider this even plausible. Know what else? COMEY NEVER QUESTIONED WHAT 47 MEANT! It could be reckless that Comey knew 47 meant “Trump” and knew “86” meant at least getting rid of him in some fashion. It would be laughable that the former FBI Director didn’t stop and wonder if it would be reckless to applaud “getting rid of the President” in some fashion as “clever” or “cool”. Conscious disregard of an objective threat to the President is a crime. Also, neither statute requires ANY intent to carry out the threat! So yeah…not good to be Comey! And yeah…his Instagram post was reckless. @TheJusticeDept is treating this case like dozens of other similar cases. That consistency IS legitimacy. My $.02.