Protestance

25.6K posts

Protestance banner
Protestance

Protestance

@Protestance

Christian | Baptist | Nat-Con | Seahawks x Kraken Psalm 23:1-6

Washington State Katılım Ekim 2019
1.6K Takip Edilen616 Takipçiler
Protestance retweetledi
Benny Johnson
Benny Johnson@bennyjohnson·
I would like to publicly endorse Scott Pressler for Chairman of the RNC. Tyler Bowyer as co-Chair. No one cares more about Republican base strategy on a grassroots level than these two. It would mean Republican majorities for the next 50 years. Time to do what must be done.
English
1.2K
5K
21.6K
181.4K
Protestance
Protestance@Protestance·
@emailjobenjoyer @0hour1 There's plenty of spineless RINOs to be sure, but at least when it comes to the federal government, you've got outliers. Imagine where we'd be right now if we had more Stephen Millers. I don't know of any outliers at the state level. None of them excite me.
English
0
0
1
20
Probable Spam
Probable Spam@emailjobenjoyer·
@Protestance @0hour1 As opposed to the federal gov where the Republican Party is basically controlled opposition lol
English
1
0
0
14
0HOUR1
0HOUR1@0hour1·
Most of the Trump derangement syndrome comes from the Pacific Northwest. Huge trend.
English
740
919
11.9K
108K
Protestance
Protestance@Protestance·
@0hour1 And the Republican Party leadership in these states are basically controlled opposition, so nothing changes.
English
1
0
9
141
Protestance
Protestance@Protestance·
@0hour1 Nah man, the PNW gets a bad rep, it's just the cities (Greater Seattle Area, Portland, SF Bay Area, etc.) Drive 20-30 minutes outside of these places, you'll run into some of the most hardcore conservatives you've ever met.
English
11
0
79
1.1K
Protestance
Protestance@Protestance·
Exodus 20:8
English
0
0
0
14
TheJFKReport
TheJFKReport@TheJFKReport·
Real resistance means men leading as protectors and warriors in the home, Church, and culture. This requires strength rather than weakness or compromise. Women have vital roles, but not as pastors, politicians, influencers shaping doctrine, or blurring the lines God ordained. We need courage across traditions, but the fullness is in the Orthodox Church that withstood empires.
TheJFKReport tweet media
El Mirage, AZ 🇺🇸 English
1
0
1
374
Steve Deace
Steve Deace@SteveDeaceShow·
Last night another reminder why I don’t spend my time on here arguing as an evangelical there wasn’t any Christianity between the Church Fathers and the Reformation, or dogging “dispensationalism” when most doing so clearly don’t even know what it means, and became a great admirer of Charlie’s ability/willingness to assemble a coalition capable of saving the West. Because the dividing line these demonic days isn’t our theological differences within orthodoxy, but the willingness to see and then do something about the unified cultural forces that will kill us all — regardless of our theological disagreements — if given the chance.
English
35
55
403
13.7K
Rick Scott
Rick Scott@ScottforFlorida·
Great seeing @JoeGruters tonight at Mar-a-Lago. He is doing a fantastic job leading the RNC. Republicans are fired up for the midterms! It was great talking about the Save America Act tonight - we have to get it done!
Rick Scott tweet media
English
3.7K
310
1.3K
240K
Protestance
Protestance@Protestance·
@tylerbowyer We need an RNC Chairman that will take the job seriously. Michael Whatley was great in this regard.
English
0
0
0
125
Tyler Bowyer
Tyler Bowyer@tylerbowyer·
Here’s a good starting list to get out & help for 2026: ANDY BIGGS: Governor AZ NATE MORRIS: Senate KY TOM TIFFANY: Governor WI KEN PAXTON: Senate TX DAVID FLIPPO: Congress NV MICHAEL ALFONSO: Congress WI MIKE COLLINS: Senate GA JOE MITCHELL: Congress IA MARK LAMB: Congress AZ
English
244
1.5K
5.1K
128.4K
Protestance
Protestance@Protestance·
@RealPData I'm not sure if anyone else has noticed this, but operations seemed to be running smoothly when @WhatleyNC was Chairman of the RNC. Ever since Joe Gruters took over, it seems like the GOP is asleep at the wheel.
English
0
0
1
29
Protestance
Protestance@Protestance·
You're an idiot. You can't divorce Christianity from Judaism, considering our main argument is that Christianity is the fulfilment of everything Judaism pointed to - all the Old Testament Scriptures about the Messiah. The New Testament begins with the genealogy written by Levi (also known as Matthew) tracing back through the history of the Jewish covenant and to the birth of the Messiah. Every book of the New Testament was likely written by a Jew (the only two possible exceptions are Luke and Acts). It is prophesized throughout the Bible that the Jews will mourn and turn to Christ in the End Times.
English
2
0
0
21
Steve Deace
Steve Deace@SteveDeaceShow·
Today's @BlazeTV show: a deep dive on dispensationalism with one of the leading theologians in that category. What actually is it? Is it unfairly being maligned, or is it heterodoxical? youtube.com/watch?v=IgipzW…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
36
13
72
27.3K
Protestance
Protestance@Protestance·
The restoration of Israel was believed by even the early church fathers before they began to spiritualize prophecies. Jonathan Edwards and Charles Spurgeon both believed the necessity for the future restoration of the nation of Israel to fulfill the prophecy in Romans 9-11, you simpleton. Edwards was a known antisemite who lived a century before Darby, and Spurgeon hated Dispensationalism (and preached against it), yet both of them believed this. I wonder why?
English
1
0
0
29
Protestance
Protestance@Protestance·
Yes, it is. Stop pushing this utter garbage and read before responding. 1. The "people of a prince" is referring to the nations of the world under the Antichrist. The earlier reference to the Prince in verse 25 is capitalized because it is referring to the Messiah. The word prince is lowercase in verse 27 because it is referring to the Antichrist. 2. Titus made no covenants or treaties with the Jews, because they literally refused to surrender. Therefore the "people of a prince shall destroy the city and the sanctuary" can't be referring to his siege of Jerusalem, because Titus never broke any formal agreement/covenant (which is a fundamental part of this prophecy). He delivered terms to them repeatedly through a man named Josephus (a historian) urging the rebels to surrender peacefully. He was refused by John of Gischala and Simon bar Giora. 3. Yes, their house will be left desolate, AFTER the Third Temple is rebuilt and the covenant is broken (the "holy place" Jesus is referring to in Daniel's prophecy in Matthew 24). This is the transition into the Great Tribulation, which is the second (and terrifying) 3.5 year sequence out of the 7 year period. 4. Just for additional salt in the wound, this prophecy is affirmed AGAIN by Paul in 2 Thessalonians 2. 4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. 5 Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? 6 And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. 7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. 8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: 9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, 4. (cont.) Titus was not powerful, charismatic or deceptive enough to be the one described throughout the Bible as the prince, the beast, the man of lawlessness, the wicked one, the son of perdition, etc. (all of which are the same person). If he were, you would have to explain how he somehow came in the name of Satan and somehow possessed powers described by the prophets, the disciples and Jesus Himself, yet we have no record of this anywhere. Fun fact: Titus actually protested against destroying the Temple, and even tried to extinguish the fires which were set against his wishes by his men. 5. Jesus literally affirms the Daniel 9 prophecy in the Premillennial interpretation in Matthew 24 when His disciples ask Him how to know the sign of his return. Christ's return was not imminent 37 years after He died and rose again. It makes no sense that Jesus would've told them of an event that was, at a minimum, 2000+ years before His return (minimum in the sense we are assuming we are close to the End Times).
Protestance tweet media
English
1
0
0
36
Bohan
Bohan@BohanTheRefiner·
It isn’t caused by the Prince. It’s caused by the people of the Prince. Their continued defilement of the temple was an abomination. Your house is left to you desolate. Abomination causes desolation.
Bohan tweet media
English
2
0
0
25
Protestance
Protestance@Protestance·
@BohanTheRefiner @SaltyC2009 @SteveDeaceShow @DeaceOnline No, they were asking Jesus for the sign of His coming so they would know when to expect His return. The destruction of the temple nearly 2000 years ago wasn't a sign of the imminent return of Christ. The "abomination of desolation" and the "prince" in Daniel 9 are the Antichrist.
English
2
0
0
35
Protestance
Protestance@Protestance·
@BohanTheRefiner @SaltyC2009 @SteveDeaceShow @DeaceOnline No, it isn't. The prophecy that the people will flee into the mountains towards the "end" after the Antichrist enters the "holy place" is also reaffirmed in John's vision in Revelation, which I linked. Jesus Himself affirmed the prophecy, whether you like it or not.
Protestance tweet media
English
1
0
0
25
Protestance
Protestance@Protestance·
@BohanTheRefiner @SaltyC2009 @SteveDeaceShow @DeaceOnline I just debunked this, I don't know why you keep repeating it. x.com/Protestance/st…
Protestance@Protestance

Incorrect, that passage is regarding the abomination of desolation caused by the prince in Daniel's prophecy in Daniel 9. SaltyC is arguing that "prince" was General Titus, and he is wrong. The timeline doesn't fit no matter how you try to spin it, and beyond that, Jesus referenced it in specific regard to the Tribulation. Everything He is saying in this passage is in direct response to His disciples asking Him what sign to look for to know when Jesus would return. 4 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you. 5 For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many. 6 And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. 7 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. 8 All these are the beginning of sorrows. 9 Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake. 10 And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another. 11 And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many. 12 And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold. 13 But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved. 14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come. 15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) 16 Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains: 17 Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his house: 18 Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes. 19 And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days! 20 But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day: 21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. Take it up with Jesus.

English
1
0
0
31