⬣ SolCap.PLS 🚀⬣

Want to know why there is a $pDAI cult? Just watch this…. $pDAI to $1 is inevitable - PulseChain ❤️

To the greatest crypto community in the galaxy... May the 4th be with you.

Shield and unshield your tokens with Railgun, super fast, cheap, private, and user-friendly, using @zkxwallet. Real privacy is on Ethereum, PulseChain, and EVMs. Just click, and it is done!

We built @zkxwallet on top of the Ambire and Kohahu frameworks, but it’s far from a simple fork. We’ve developed our own native Railgun integration using Railgun SDK. In the coming weeks, Liberty Shield will be integrated directly into the wallet, significantly reducing the cost of shielding and unshielding on Railgun. This will make privacy accessible even for users with smaller capital on unsupported blockchains. Privacy should be for everyone. Take a closer look and compare it with Ambire and other wallets, you’ll clearly see the value we’ve added. 👇👇👇

Tomorrow @fundstrat's Tom Lee will be live on @SquawkCNBC at 6:10am ET. Set your alarm ⏰

People that spend time hacking take absolutely massive risk. The laws around hacking are actually quite harsh, so harsh that hackers often kill themselves rather than go to court. Maybe AI will get people at risk of spending their time doing criminal things, to vibe code honest things instead.

@martin_aurelius @paoloardoino @tether Decentralized stablecoin 👊👊👊

Probably nothing…..

LibertySwap <3

The official PulseChain website has just been updated to include support for ProveX and new price charts. @zkxwallet your move?

🚨💥 THIS IS GOING TO BE THE BIGGEST CRYPTO EXPOSÉ VIDEO IN YOUTUBE HISTORY This one exposes EVERYTHING they don’t want you to see. I drop this nuke TODAY… or TOMORROW? Comment “TODAY” 🔥 or “TOMORROW” 👇 RIGHT NOW.

Most recent hacks stem from UI layers and external dependencies, not the smart contract logic itself. With “vibe coding,” developers often rely on AI to deploy code, which can make vulnerabilities easier to introduce and expose. We take a more cautious approach to product deployment, minimizing reliance on third parties. That said, maintaining strict standards is still very difficult. I think, at a minimum, we should follow: ✅Code reviewed by 2+ developers ✅Test suites passed with >95% coverage ✅No HIGH/CRITICAL findings from Slither ✅4+ weeks of testnet completed ✅Monitoring infrastructure and dependencies in place Operational readiness: ✅Incident response plan written and tested ✅Emergency procedures tested ✅Team trained on deployment ✅Communication plan ready ✅Legal review

@Bugimus @yourfriendSOMMI

Full Cabin in the Woods defense: youtu.be/WwCUylVMfF4

Todd Standing: Real Experiencer or Hoaxer? My Honest Take (and Why I Can’t Fully Trust Him) Todd Standing. Super controversial, and my gut screams “narcissist”—he comes across way too needy for people to believe him, almost giddy for validation as the one who’ll finally prove Sasquatch. I’ll admit right up front that I don’t like Todd’s demeanor—it’s full-scale cringe. That can taint my opinion, and I own it. I’m 100% convinced Bigfoot is real (my account shows I chase real evidence: tracks, audio, sightings). But belief doesn’t mean buying every claim. His most well-known stuff—the crisp “Jake” and “Jane” faces—still feels off, and this Gaia clip only heightens the suspicion. In this Gaia footage Todd treats the creatures like personal buddies and mentors, zooming in on eye spacing and head size while framing himself as uniquely trusted. Dramatic, spiritual, heavy on the “I’m the chosen connector” vibe. Pair that with the recent Cabin in the Woods defense by Robert Maxwell (needle scaling arguing massive heads, rebuttals to image manipulation and props, eye sizing). They make some strong technical points. I’ll link Robert’s full video in the replies. Dr. Jeff Meldrum is consistently objective and measured in his language. He calls the portraits some of the most astounding in history, notes they give the feeling of looking into a real creature’s eyes, and finds them worthy of serious study with “potential authenticity.” He’s diplomatic, intrigued by anatomy/gait/variations, and had his own sighting with Todd—but he doesn’t go full “100% proven, unmanipulated Sasquatch.” As Meldrum leaned toward authentic, I actually lean toward hoax. Here’s my specific suspicion as someone pretty handy with Photoshop: If I really worked at it with the right tools and time, I could take a human face (Todd’s or similar), enlarge the upper head proportionally (20-30%), preserve the core features, add fur texture, composite it into the forest with foreground needles, and create something that looks exactly like the Jake stills/video frames. And as the Cabin defense itself demonstrates when they morph/scale the upper portion of Todd’s head to Jake’s, the proportions line up eerily well once adjusted for size. Todd even does the head-size demo—glasses, ruler—looking genuinely excited that his own head couldn’t possibly match. This is just a hypothesis I want to rule out before making any firmer judgments. Without raw, unedited video files (full metadata, longer takes, multiple angles), we can’t verify whether simple post-production enlargement or compositing happened. Todd releases edited clips, cites protection/editing choices, and teases “more coming,” but that selective pattern—plus his production background and history of selling “ultimate proof” DVDs—keeps the red flags flying. VFX/forensic analysts (Poling & Falconer’s detailed NAWAC document is taken as gospel by a lot of the Bigfoot community) still flag unnatural lighting, movement, and lack of dynamic biology. In the spirit of fairness, I must add that “Kabota,” with the dark face and wrinkles, is much more intriguing to me. With Meldrum, I’m saying that looks far more authentic than the others. I’d love to do a more focused analysis of that video if Todd ever releases more details about it. The bottom line: I truly think Todd had real experiences. But I strongly suspect he is also a hoaxer and therefore should not be trusted. I feel exactly the same way about Dr. Steven Greer in the UFO world—I think he had genuine alien contact but also faked flares for his paying followers. Once someone does that, they must be called out and not trusted. I do not see this as “Todd is full of crap and Bigfoot isn’t real.” I see Todd as a dedicated experiencer *and* hoaxer. This is a family squabble as opposed to a tribal war. I would be cautious about trusting his presented evidence as authentic Bigfoot footage. But don’t dismiss the whole Sasquatch phenomenon either—real ones are elusive masters of the forest, not known to pose for crisp portraits. In fact, everything I’ve seen points to the exact opposite. They’ll connect with trusted people and decline recordings. I could be wrong—happy to be proven so. What do you think after seeing the Gaia clip? Did you watch the full Cabin in the Woods defense? Did Meldrum’s measured take or the head-size demo change your mind on “Jake,” or does the digital-alteration possibility (and raw-footage gap) raise the same flags for you? Civil discussion please—what’s your take on Todd’s claims? 👇🐞👣 #Sasquatch #ToddStanding

@TheGreekGod11 🤣🤣🤣 👌 ACCURATE

When the 4-year cycler realizes he was listening to the wrong KOLs… right as the bull run resumes 💀

@LibertySwapFi @tylersmus1c History in the making…..

@tylersmus1c To record the historic moments of the coin.

Liberty Swap is a token business, always has been, always will be. We work to accumulate more PCOCK and PLS. (We’ve decided to buy more PLS and deal with the outcome if needed.)

@NS2017a @CryptoRank_io It is the time!

@traderrocko Decentralized stablecoin plays are back 😏😏😏 Do you know of any similar plays on other chains?

@QuintenFrancois They want to re-peg UST and PDAI? 😳😳😳😳