PulseChainStats.com | PulseChain Stats & Portfolio

🚨 Portfolio Update is LIVE on PulseChainStats! 🚨 This is one of our biggest portfolio updates yet, with a complete backend rebuild, more protocol support, and a lot more data for your wallets. What’s New: ✅ Multi-Wallet support increased from 10 → 20 wallets ✅ Complete portfolio & transaction system rebuilt Faster More accurate Better contract mapping Improved transaction history ✅ Newly added HSI Stakes UFO LP Staking 📊 Supported Across Single & Multi-Wallet PulseChain Validator Positions PulseChain Validators PulseX V1 LP PulseX V2 LP PulseX INC Farms 9MM V3 LP Positions 9INCH LP Positions 9INCH BBC Farms TIDE (Balancer V3 Fork) PHAME Leverage Positions LiquidLoans Vaults & Stability Pool FLEX Vaults & Stability Pool EARN Vaults & Stability Pool INCprinter Vaults & Stability Pool PHIAT Positions PHUX (Balancer V2 Fork) PHAME HELGO Staking ICOSA Staking HEDRON Staking PTGC Staking UFO LP Staking HEX Stakes (PulseChain & Ethereum) HSI Stakes PumpTires Tokens Wallet Bridge Inflows & Outflows Transaction History with Custom Contract Mapping NFTs 🙏 We need your help! Please put the portfolio through its paces and let us know if you find: Missing balances Incorrect protocol values Transaction issues Bugs or UI problems Every report helps make PulseChainStats better for everyone. Note: Multi-chain protocol support has been temporarily removed due to the high infrastructure costs of indexing multiple chains. If the community would like to see it return, we’re happy to add it back if enough donations help cover the ongoing costs. As always, thank you to everyone testing and providing feedback. Keep breaking things so we can fix them.

👀 Interesting… The OA has transferred: • 266.64B PLS • $1.49M worth To a single destination address That’s enough for roughly 8,332 PulseChain validators. Maybe nothing. Or maybe the OA is preparing to operate its own validator infrastructure.

Can you f*ckwits stop selling PLS so we don’t have to keep adjusting our ATL settings like bruv

@w00kiecrisp 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😭

@PulseChainStats Hey it’s not working on my end. It just shows everything is down 99% for the past 5 years? Is this correct?

🚨 Portfolio Update is LIVE on PulseChainStats! 🚨 This is one of our biggest portfolio updates yet, with a complete backend rebuild, more protocol support, and a lot more data for your wallets. What’s New: ✅ Multi-Wallet support increased from 10 → 20 wallets ✅ Complete portfolio & transaction system rebuilt Faster More accurate Better contract mapping Improved transaction history ✅ Newly added HSI Stakes UFO LP Staking 📊 Supported Across Single & Multi-Wallet PulseChain Validator Positions PulseChain Validators PulseX V1 LP PulseX V2 LP PulseX INC Farms 9MM V3 LP Positions 9INCH LP Positions 9INCH BBC Farms TIDE (Balancer V3 Fork) PHAME Leverage Positions LiquidLoans Vaults & Stability Pool FLEX Vaults & Stability Pool EARN Vaults & Stability Pool INCprinter Vaults & Stability Pool PHIAT Positions PHUX (Balancer V2 Fork) PHAME HELGO Staking ICOSA Staking HEDRON Staking PTGC Staking UFO LP Staking HEX Stakes (PulseChain & Ethereum) HSI Stakes PumpTires Tokens Wallet Bridge Inflows & Outflows Transaction History with Custom Contract Mapping NFTs 🙏 We need your help! Please put the portfolio through its paces and let us know if you find: Missing balances Incorrect protocol values Transaction issues Bugs or UI problems Every report helps make PulseChainStats better for everyone. Note: Multi-chain protocol support has been temporarily removed due to the high infrastructure costs of indexing multiple chains. If the community would like to see it return, we’re happy to add it back if enough donations help cover the ongoing costs. As always, thank you to everyone testing and providing feedback. Keep breaking things so we can fix them.

@fhools Due to the cost and resources required. We are a free site. If people wish to donate for extra things to be added and maintained we can but otherwise we build to what is sustainable for us

@PulseChainStats Why is the Wallet Intel listed to only the last 100 inflow/outflow? Can you update it to 1000 transactions?

@AndrewKraics We support 9mm it’s under liquidity tab, and liberty we have already asked them waiting for their team to respond

@PulseChainStats Good stuff But missing $UNITY 0xc70cf25dfcf5c5e9757002106c096ab72fab299e and lp associated 9mm Also if could show Iberty Swap positions please 🔥

PulseChain’s official bridge has handled $345.6M in value over the past year. 📈 Inflow: $170.25M 📉 Outflow: $175.35M ⚖️ Net Flow: -$5.10M 🔒 Current Bridge TVL: $48.39M For all the FUD, the net difference over an entire year is surprisingly small. The best part about crypto? Everything is on-chain and verifiable. The data speaks for itself.

@lmacstack We have stated numerous times the site is undergoing revamp the pages have been done and portfolio is being worked on. Considering the sheer size of our project and we do it all for free a little patience is nice.

@PulseChainStats I still can't see my ETH stuff like i use to. Still appreciate what you guys do though!

From launch ROI to 30-day momentum, the contrast is clear. Legacy majors are still far ahead from launch: BTC +704% ETH +64.5K% SOL +5588% MATIC +551.3K% BNB +454.0K% Meanwhile PulseChain ecosystem assets are still trading below launch: PLS -63.3% PLSX -20.2% HEX -73.0% INC -92.2% But zoom in on the last 30 days and momentum is picking up: INC +22.2% SOL +19.8% PLSX +14.8% HEX +6.2% eHEX +6.2% ETH +5.4% PLS +4.9% BTC +2.3% The takeaway? PulseChain coins may still be down hard from launch, but recent price action shows life is returning. If that trend continues while sentiment stays this depressed, the upside from these levels could get very interesting. 👀

Since launch, the PulseX buy & burn has permanently removed 1.75 TRILLION PLSX from the user supply. ✅ User supply: 21.09T → 19.34T PLSX ✅ 8.29% of the entire user supply is gone forever. Every swap on PulseX contributes to making PLSX scarcer. Most tokens inflate over time. PLSX does the opposite. When adoption grows, so does the rate of supply reduction. Less supply. Same or higher demand. That’s the kind of tokenomics that can compound over years, not weeks. 📈🔥

@ArkhamIntelPRO2 @GigaTheMinter lolz

@GigaTheMinter vibe code the % and max buttons in bruv aint no one inputting manually

productive day literally just did 20% my port in a day on robinhood use umbra

@Hex_Turbo The dev builds it inbetween other projects but it is about 3/4 rebuilt and redesigned it’s mostly mobile support left to refine and adding a few extra additions

@PulseChainStats Awesome! Looking forward to the portfolio rebuild. Got an ETA on that?

We have some good news! The dev made a mistake 😂 they forgot to remove the deposit address from the PLS supply totals! lolz Deposit address is like stale PLS from validators on the execution layer With the corrected totals (minus the deposit stale contract PLS) - The Net change since fork: +325.98B PLS $2.14M (at todays prices) - Net inflation of +0.241% - Cumulative burn PLS: 230.91B PLS $1.51M (still the same) - Staked PLS in validators change this year: -275.48B PLS (-16.540%) · -$1.81M Still not great, but not as bad! lolz

@Hex_Turbo We can expand the stats in the future to house non OA data too, it’s no issue we are bringing stats no one has yet and refining as we go The portfolio rebuild comes first but we can add it to the to do list after the fact

A founder could have 99.9% of the supply, the users 0.1%. Total inflation just 1%. The illusion is that those 99.9% coins aren't circulating and will never get sold, so the actual inflation rate on the users coins is 1000%. This is taking it to the extreme but I'm sure you get the point. It's unfair to compare it to other Blockchains like Ethereum because OA has over 90% of the coins. I like to keep things honest and transparent.

Can you prove without a doubt when the genesis wallet distribution happened what was distributed to ‘holders’ and what wasn’t. From what I see on chain there’s no large wallet holding 99% of the supply there’s hundreds of thousands of unknown wallets holding supply Last I checked Richard won in court too lolz

just a heads up since it seems to go over peoples heads.. Pulsechain is a security under the clarity act.. EVery protocol, all the centralized supply... It's literally designed to protect you from things like Pulsechain and im not being hyperbolic or dramatic so while its good for a lot of real memes and shit its very bad for you in this eco

The page does have a stat at the top excluding OA but with pls the OA did have validators and the OA wallets did accrue a portion of that inflation Due to the risks of POS the OA can again enter staking to protect the network if ever needed For these reason pls supply page should in our opinion have the OA supply Our PLSX supply page removes it

You have to 10x that to show the net inflation on the circulating supply, around 2%. The OA coins skew the numbers because there's so many of them. If you want to compare it fairly to Ethereum then you have to do it this way. The Ethereum circulating supply is pretty much the same as the total supply because the EF has hardly any coins left. Also because the liquidity is so low, $2m per year is a lot of potential sell pressure. I still believe though.

@sseb07 If you read the description it does make sense we only have access to the top 10,000 wallets for PLS PLSX HEX INC and PRVX Meaning all other wallets are in the leagues below and not even relevant to worry about Its clearly stated at the top for users

@PulseChainStats Holders league numbers and total wallets doesnt not add up, huge diffence in numbers, unless 1.45m wallets are spam

@S1ckAlpha He’s not necessarily selling into the markets, he’s using OTC desks having entities buy his BTC off him the same way he uses them to buy. All this “ Saylor is selling “ is a fud narrative.

so bitcoin:native went up while Saylor was selling into $MSTR Bulls in control maybe back into 60k => $72k next. Summer szn.

@0xExecute The all time chart timeframe? Thats the api service we use for it. We are talking to them currently. If they cannot fix it we will index that ourselves too. If you mean the chart in general we cannot fix that lolz

@PulseChainStats What about the price chart check that bad boy out

@ExitPerpet79727 x.com/pulsechainstat…

@PulseChainStats Where is the 7.25B/day coming from? I run validators and average maybe ~10,000 PLS/day per validator. The network currently has ~44k validators running. That comes to around 440M PLS/day inflation via validators. Genuine question: where's the rest come from? Thanks.

PLS supply appears to be moving in the wrong direction. +50B PLS in 7 days +217B PLS in 30 days +832B PLS in one year The recent pace equals roughly 7.25B additional PLS every day, nearly 2% annualized inflation, even after gas-fee burns. PulseChain was designed to burn fees, but current network activity is not burning enough to offset validator issuance and sell pressure that comes with the validator operators. We have already seen decisive action across the ecosystem: HEX inflation was largely absorbed through massive OA-linked long-term staking. INC emissions were aggressively reduced to practically zero. PLSX is deflationary through Buy & Burn. ProveX is also expected to implement Buy & Burn. That leaves the native gas token itself. PLS should be next. Turn PLS deflationary. 🔥

@DeFiTriggs 😂 there's a silver-lining In the devs fairness his indexing volume was correct he just forgot the display data minus

@PulseChainStats Engagement baited the F out of us all 👏