Random Character ⚡

1.9K posts

Random Character ⚡ banner
Random Character ⚡

Random Character ⚡

@Pw7Js

I spend #bitcoin. We are all Satoshi.

Katılım Haziran 2019
1.7K Takip Edilen182 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Random Character ⚡
Random Character ⚡@Pw7Js·
We are all one humanity and it's time we stopped letting nation states divide us.
English
1
0
6
371
Random Character ⚡
@Ben__Rickert Sir I cant believe I have to say this The commonwealth of Australia (i.e. the nation state of Australia) Is not The Commonwealth bank of Australia (i.e. the private company ASX CBA)
English
0
0
0
16
Random Character ⚡ retweetledi
Tom Badley
Tom Badley@CurrencyDesign·
The only thing that matters is being beta neutral to outcomes and having asymmetric payoff whatever happens. Unpack this and discover the secrets of the universe.
English
0
1
1
70
Random Character ⚡
Random Character ⚡@Pw7Js·
@waitbutwhy If everyone presses red, everyone survives If you press red, you survive regardless of whether or not some people press blue Only people who press blue can die, and if no one presses blue, no one can die. ?
English
0
0
0
5
Tim Urban
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy·
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
English
5.8K
1.5K
14.3K
26.6M
MeanHash ₿ ✪
MeanHash ₿ ✪@MeanHash·
I saved a 12 week old puppy that was being attacked by an elk hound pit bull mix. Almost tore his leg completely off. It cost me $3800 in vet bills to keep him alive and save his leg. I ended up keeping him as my own. 8 years later he saved my life from a buck that tried to kill me in my backyard. The buck had lowered his head and charged at my back while I wasn't even looking at him, and my dog charged him bit him on the back leg and got dragged across the yard. 🙏 we were both okay. 2 years later that same buck jumped into my yard over the fence and charged at my toddler son. That same dog busted through the screen door charged the buck head on and bit his throat. This time he wasn't as lucky and got gored by an antler in his back leg, but he saved my son's life. Vet bill to patch him up that time was $700. Sometimes acts of kindness towards God's creatures pay in dividends in life.
Breaking911@Breaking911

A missing 3-year-old in Louisville was found safe after a neighborhood dog led police directly to him, with bodycam video showing the dog barking and guiding officers to the child.

English
3
0
13
289
James Cappleman
James Cappleman@JamesCappleman·
That’s misleading. The trials did not show higher overall death rates in vaccinated groups. If they had, the vaccines wouldn’t have been authorized. “Negative efficacy” after 6 months confuses waning protection against infection with protection against severe illness and death, which stayed strong. You can argue policy decisions, but these claims don’t match the evidence.
English
8
0
3
683
Toby Rogers
Toby Rogers@uTobian·
A shot so safe and effective that clinical trials showed increased all cause mortality in the vaccinated group and real world data showed negative efficacy after 6 months. And then they recommended it for children and censored anyone who objected.
English
49
702
2.8K
34.7K
colourful love
colourful love@colorfullllove·
The Asbestos was found in the brake pads of the service elevators in the towers. It is a nothing burger. Current “recycle” strategy for the blades is to crush them and feed then into cement furnaces. The resin acts as fuel for the furnace and the glass fibers as silicate source for the cement formation.
English
7
2
11
1.7K
Electroverse
Electroverse@Electroversenet·
Major wind turbine manufacturers have been hit by an asbestos scandal. At Australia's $4 billion Golden Plains wind farm, testing on turbines has come back positive. Units are now quarantined and the manufacturer is launching global checks across its supply chain. This follows the asbestos found at a number of Chinese turbine manufacturers. Serious environmental concerns are now mounting. Wind blades can't be recycled, not economically or at scale. So tens of thousands of tons of blades are dumped every year, buried in pits with endless more coming as first-generation turbines hit their end of life, which is typically just 15 years. An industry sold as clean is leaving mountains of toxic waste that can't be recycled.
English
234
3.1K
4.9K
168.5K
Random Character ⚡
Random Character ⚡@Pw7Js·
@AvatarX I would agree with the OP that there does not appear to be a sustainable competitive advantage with any of these models. But I would disagree about 5.2. It's great. Long running full-auto development tasks. Give it a brief and tools to check its work and let it run for days.
English
1
0
0
11
Avatar X
Avatar X@AvatarX·
@Pw7Js Yeah, there is a lot back and forth every quarter right now on what is best. What have you been doing with it?
English
1
0
0
14
Random Character ⚡
Random Character ⚡@Pw7Js·
@AvatarX Fwiw I have moved from Claude to Codex running 5.2 and it is essentially AGI. It can run async for days and do anything coding without mistakes. Truly game changing
English
1
0
0
27
Avatar X
Avatar X@AvatarX·
As insane as the numbers are, so is the backing and growth of OpenAI. The question is if it can actually compete against xAI, Gemini and Anthropic at the same time it is being sued left and right for valid reasons. It should lose, but not yet clear it will. 2yrs from now to know.
English
1
0
0
36
Random Character ⚡ retweetledi
Free Speech Union of Australia
Free Speech Union of Australia@FSUofAustralia·
Albo is seeking to criminalise ordinary speech with hefty penalties. It is time to make sure the Liberals hold the line and fully oppose this antisemitic Bill. Please write to your Liberal Senators now.
English
106
270
1.7K
134K
Random Character ⚡ retweetledi
Jacinta Nampijinpa
Jacinta Nampijinpa@JNampijinpa·
The @AustralianJA has issued a clear warning about the Government’s proposed hate speech laws — raising serious concerns about overreach, consultation, and the impact on religious freedom. These are not concerns that can be brushed aside from the very people these laws are being created to protect.
Australian Jewish Association@AustralianJA

AJA STATEMENT The Australian Jewish Association (AJA) is urging all Members of Parliament to reject the draft ‘hate speech’ bill AJA CEO Robert Gregory said: “Antisemitism has surged in Australia under the Albanese Government, and it is clear that decisive action is required. While the proposed bill contains some potentially useful measures, the manner in which it is being rushed through Parliament is deeply concerning. This process denies Australians the opportunity to properly scrutinise and comment on legislation of significant consequence. I have spoken with members of the Jewish community who are shocked that measures purportedly designed to protect them are being introduced without genuine consultation. The Australian Jewish Association was invited to make a submission but was given less than two days to do so, despite the significance of this legislation. The Government’s haste is particularly offensive given its failure to act on the Segal Report, which was handed to it in July 2025 by the Special Envoy on Antisemitism, an envoy the Government itself appointed. It is also unclear what problem this bill is intended to solve. The Bondi Beach Chanukah massacre was allegedly motivated by radical Islamic ideology, yet the proposed legislation goes out of its way to avoid confronting that reality. By excluding radical Islamic extremism, it is difficult to see how this legislation will have any impact on preventing future Bondi-style attacks. If the legislation is expanded, as expected, it could perversely result in victims being prosecuted for criticising the ideology that inspired the violence against them. Furthermore, the bill’s carve-out for hate preachers fatally undermines its effectiveness. There are serious concerns that the Government intends to expand this bill to cover additional ‘protected attributes’, potentially criminalising the sincerely held views of many Australians, particularly people of faith. Ironically, many of the victims of the Bondi Beach attack were religious Jews whose traditional beliefs may themselves fall foul of future expansions of this legislation. For that reason, this bill will rightly be seen as an attack on religious freedom. Any government that proposes to criminalise speech must act in a sober, cautious, and bipartisan manner. Governments should concern themselves only with the most egregious forms of speech, such as direct incitement to violence. This bill risks regulating subjective opinions and relies on vague concepts such as ‘intimidation’. Australia risks heading down the same path as the United Kingdom, where thousands of people are arrested each year merely for expressing opinions. I am deeply concerned that invoking the Jewish community as the justification for this deeply flawed bill will, in fact, lead to an increase in antisemitism. I have consulted with leaders from other religious organisations, and they share these concerns. Legislation of this magnitude must command broad community support. Australians, both Jewish and non-Jewish, must be given the opportunity to have their voices heard. I urge all Members of Parliament to reject this bill."

English
104
217
1.2K
28.3K
James Qld
James Qld@RightDownUnder·
@JohnHumphreys99 So who decides if no one makes a complaint? Will we just have govt officers trawling the internet deciding what they don’t approve day to day?
English
8
1
61
1.7K
John Humphreys
John Humphreys@JohnHumphreys99·
Australia already has "hate speech" laws, but those are civil laws, where there needs to be a specific complaint and the punishment is a forced apology and/or a fine. This is the famous 18c that Abbott promised to remove but then failed. The proposed new laws will make it a criminal offence to incite hatred or share ideas of hatred against people from another nation or race, with a penalty of up to five years in jail. This law applies even if nobody has made a complaint, and irrespective of whether the speech actually caused hate or fear. This is a dangerous escalation in the war against free speech. Our political and legal class take an expansive and slanted view on what constitutes "hate", and these laws will make debates about immigration dangerous and some political opinions illegal. We have one week before these proposals will become law. Speak up now. Tell your family & friends. Like & share other posts that are critical of these laws. Contact your local MP. If you're in a political party, reach out to your party leaders and let them know that these anti-speech laws are unacceptable. Time is running out.
English
58
439
1.8K
117.6K
Jacquelyn Melinek
Jacquelyn Melinek@jacqmelinek·
Farcaster vanished when CT needed them the most
English
37
5
124
19.3K
Random Character ⚡ retweetledi
Aussie Revivalist
Aussie Revivalist@BrianTaxpayers·
A coordinated crackdown on political speech is unfolding across the West, and Australia is being pulled into it. Governments in the UK, Europe, and Australia are now threatening platform bans, blocks, and regulatory action against X. This is being justified through online safety laws, AI regulation, and claims of responsibility. But taken together, these moves are not about safety in any meaningful sense. They are about control. The United States has the First Amendment. Australia, the UK, and Europe do not. That gap is now being exploited deliberately. Because these governments cannot legally force American companies to censor political speech inside the US, they are applying pressure everywhere else. The objective is to create a regulatory environment outside the United States so hostile that X is forced to comply globally. If that happens, constitutional protections at home become irrelevant in practice. This is not an isolated dispute about one platform feature. It is a test case. If a government can ban or block an entire platform used by millions of people, not because it is illegal but because it refuses to submit to political regulation, then no platform is safe. Once that precedent exists, it becomes a standing threat hanging over all online speech. This escalation is happening now for a reason. Across the West, establishment parties are losing control of the narrative environment. Populist and right-wing movements are rising in Europe and the UK. In Australia, @OneNationAus is polling at or above the Liberal Party in multiple datasets. If this trend continues, Labor does not simply lose to the Coalition. It risks being displaced altogether. X represents a structural problem for that political order. For years, political speech online was shaped quietly through NGO pressure, advertiser boycotts, and informal regulatory threats. That enforcement model depended on compliance without confrontation. When X stopped responding to those pressures, governments moved to the only tool left to them: direct state power. Censorship is now being rebranded as online safety. No serious person argues that illegal content should not be addressed. But banning or blocking an entire platform used by millions of Australians is a disproportionate response that undermines free political communication and sets a precedent that will not stop with X. This only succeeds if it is done quietly. Once platform bans are normalised, they become just another regulatory option. The public is presented with a fait accompli. Debate comes later, if at all. That is why action now matters. There is a petition calling on the Australian Government to rule out any ban or blocking of X, reject coordinated international censorship efforts, and defend free political communication in Australia. Public pressure is the only thing that raises the political cost of this strategy. If you care about the future of open debate, do not assume this will resolve itself. It will not. I've put together a petition opposing government attempts to ban X. Please consider signing it: reviveaus.com/defend-speech
English
11
82
192
20.7K
XO
XO@Trader_XO·
Over the past 40 days, I’ve been deep in code, nonstop, exploring what’s now possible with coding-focused LLMs and agentic AI orchestration. Before going full-time into trading in March 2020, I had around 12 years of professional software development experience. Between 2020 and 2024, I made several attempts to step back in, but it always felt like a grind, too much boilerplate, too much mundane repetition - whilst balancing trading. The last month or so has been different. I’ve been putting in 12+ hour days without noticing where the time goes. Coding and learning dominate my days, and I’ve built more in a few weeks than I managed in several previous years combined. These tools are extraordinarily powerful and honestly addictive. There’s no reason not to fully leverage them across multiple domains and verticals. For those newer to software development, the edge is shifting. It’s becoming less about reading every line of code and more about understanding systems, how software fits together end to end. If you’re early in the journey, focus on fundamentals: frontend to backend, distributed systems, services, security, DevOps, and deployment. Add in agentic, multi-model RAG (LangChain, LangGraph, vectors etc..), and deeply understand the problem domain you’re solving, and you can spin up remarkably capable applications. Phenomenal times we’re living in and my passion for building is back. So addictive, in fact, that it’s time to park day trading, shift to HTF swings only and grasp this opportunity infront of us. Wishing you all a blessed week ahead.
English
104
44
1.1K
86.7K
Random Character ⚡ retweetledi
Alice Smith
Alice Smith@TheAliceSmith·
Picture of one rugged individualist standing against the warmth of collectivism on June 5, 1989.
Alice Smith tweet media
English
724
12.3K
59.4K
892.3K