TheRealQuarts

10.5K posts

TheRealQuarts banner
TheRealQuarts

TheRealQuarts

@QuartsThe

Never tired of moving on

Katılım Mayıs 2021
518 Takip Edilen18 Takipçiler
TheRealQuarts retweetledi
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
Getting diagnosed with an incurable disease is the best thing to happen to me in a long time. My project shifted overnight from longevity staples to disease resolution and frontier biotech. We have so many awesome things cooking.
English
599
210
10.5K
578.4K
TheRealQuarts retweetledi
Henrik Dahl
Henrik Dahl@SociologenHD·
Dear Under Secretary of War Elbridge Colby (@USWPColby), Thank you very much for your lengthy post setting out the principles and guidelines that you believe should govern America's former allies in NATO. For our part, we have taken note that President Trump no longer consistently guarantees that NATO's Article 5 will be honoured. We have taken note that President Trump has shown a marked inclination to do Vladimir Putin's bidding, even when doing so runs counter to our strategic interests and to our political and moral commitments to Ukraine. We have taken note that the U.S. administration has moved NATO allies further down the queue for deliveries of American weapons than previously agreed. We have taken note that President Trump has repeatedly spoken disparagingly of the sacrifices made by our soldiers when NATO allies answered the call after the United States invoked Article 5. We have taken note that President Trump appears to believe, mistakenly, that NATO is some kind of emergency hotline the United States can call whenever military operations far outside the Alliance's purpose and area of responsibility go wrong. We have also taken note that President Trump regularly speaks of acquiring sovereignty over Canada and Greenland. And, of course, we have taken note that President Trump has shown a clear willingness to unilaterally disregard the trade agreements concluded between the European Union and the United States. Taken together, all of this means that we must adapt to the reality that we can no longer rely on the United States. And that is exactly what we are doing. You are, of course, quite right that American defence manufacturers produce excellent weapons. But many of those systems are also becoming outdated in light of contemporary military doctrine - as the war in Ukraine has demonstrated with remarkable clarity. We naturally appreciate that you still find the time to lecture us on your views and on America's expectations. But in light of the chain of events set in motion by President Trump and his administration, we must admit that they carry rather limited weight.
Under Secretary of War Elbridge Colby@USWPColby

There is a great deal of hubbub about a collective “middle powers”strategy these days. At DoW, we are not concerned that this is a serious possibility. Rather, we are more concerned that a few allies and partners will *think it is* and waste valuable time, money, and political capital on a distraction. 1/

English
212
1.3K
4.3K
318.2K
TheRealQuarts retweetledi
Edward Reid
Edward Reid@ReidEdwardII·
This is just another way to avoid the central issue. The criticism is not that Ukraine fought against Russian aggression, nor that Poland is somehow pro-Kremlin. The criticism is that Ukraine continues to honor figures and formations associated with the mass murder of Polish civilians during World War II. Calling Karol Nawrocki a “Kremlin asset” is particularly unconvincing. Nawrocki built much of his public profile on documenting Soviet crimes, supporting the removal of communist-era monuments, and opposing Russian historical narratives. Whatever one thinks of his politics, portraying him as a friend of Putin ignores his actual record. Poland has been one of Ukraine’s strongest supporters, taking in millions of refugees and providing extensive political, humanitarian, and military assistance. That support does not require Poles to remain silent about Volhynia or the glorification of individuals connected to atrocities against Polish civilians. Reconciliation is not achieved by dismissing concerns as Russian propaganda. It begins with acknowledging historical facts, honoring all victims, and rejecting the celebration of those responsible for crimes against innocent people.
English
22
199
1.2K
9.6K
TheRealQuarts retweetledi
InvestorFromEurope
InvestorFromEurope@TheDealMakerGuy·
Everyone repeats the "EU poured money into Poland" line like it ends the argument. Worth asking where a lot of that money went, and what Poland gave up to get it. Start with the funds. Brussels pays for a Polish motorway and the contract gets won by a German or Austrian firm, the machines come from Germany, the consultants bill from Frankfurt. That's not a conspiracy, it's in the EU's own research: contracts in Central Europe routinely go to firms from the countries that "donated" the money. A chunk of it does a lap through Poland and heads back west. Then the part sold as generosity. Most of what gets called Europe investing in Poland was Western firms chasing cheaper labour. The border opened and German and French companies moved production east. That's arbitrage (not aid). They cut their costs, Poland got the jobs, and the brands and the profits stayed west. What they didn't build here they bought: the biggest grocery chain in Poland is Portuguese, Warsaw's power grid is German-owned. Now watch the same rulebook in German hands. UniCredit owned Bank Pekao, one of Poland's biggest banks, for 18 years and nobody in Brussels blinked. The moment that same Italian bank reached for Commerzbank, Berlin called it a hostile attack and the government dug in to stop it. An Italian buying a Polish bank is just the market working. An Italian buying a German one is a national emergency. Same single market. The rules get written for everyone and enforced on the small. The money helped, no argument. But the EU didn't build Poland, the Poles running their own firms did, the same firms now selling more to Germany than they buy from it. Brussels gave them a market to sell into, nothing more. Follow the invoices and the savior story falls apart.
Gandalv@Microinteracti1

What the EU Did to Poland and the Baltics I think the most underreported story in global economics is what European integration has done to the countries that were once the Soviet Union’s western margin. In 2004, Poland joined the European Union. Its unemployment rate was around 20 percent. It was a middle-income country with serious structural problems and a GDP that reflected the grey inheritance of central planning. Twenty years later, its GDP has passed one trillion dollars, having roughly tripled between accession and 2020 alone. A new study from the Polish Economic Institute found that Poland’s economy is 42 percent larger than it would have been had it not joined the EU. open.substack.com/pub/gandalv/p/…

English
73
362
2.4K
108K
TheRealQuarts retweetledi
Anonymous
Anonymous@YourAnonCentral·
Polish PM Tusk: "For the first time in years there were no Russians in the room" *Robert Fico walks by* Reporter: "Are you sure about that?"
English
47
536
3.5K
104.8K
TheRealQuarts retweetledi
Arnaud Bertrand
Arnaud Bertrand@RnaudBertrand·
If governments were actually doing their job, this Palantir document 👇 wouldn't be a manifesto they proudly boast about, but a clear sign of the urgent need to purge its software from the public institutions it has infiltrated. What are they saying, essentially? They basically promote a clash of civilization worldview in which there exists a "they" - the supposed enemies of Western civilization, whose cultures the document codes as inferior - and a "we" who must stop indulging in decadent restraint and invest massively in AI weapons and defense software (which conveniently makes Palantir's product catalog the civilizational cure). Look at point 4 for instance. They write that "the limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software." It all rests on a pretty massive assumption: that coexistence is impossible. Why would "free and democratic societies" (by which they obviously mean Western-style liberal-democracies) need to "prevail"? Why can't they simply coexist with other civilizations or political systems out there? Nowhere in the document do they defend this assumption: it's simply asserted as the starting condition of the argument. But it's the entire ballgame: if civilizations and political systems can coexist - as they largely have, imperfectly but recognizably, throughout history - then the entire case they make in the document evaporates. In fact one can argue that, studying history, the big problem was not that civilizations couldn't coexist: it was that, from time to time, one of them decided that others were inferior, threatening, or standing in the way of its rightful expansion - and acted accordingly. So many catastrophes and so much human suffering in history trace back not to the fact of plural civilizations, but to one of them deciding it could no longer tolerate the others. The problem, in other words, has almost always been exactly the worldview Palantir is now selling. Their manifesto isn't warning against the cause of some of the worst periods in history: it's arguing for reviving them! Or take point 15: they explicitly call for the re-armament of Germany and Japan, and an end to "Japanese pacifism". Basically undoing one of the foundational settlements of the post-WW2 order. I mean, think about the insanity of this for a second: a private company - unelected, answerable only to its shareholders - is casually proposing to overturn the security architecture of two continents. A settlement that took a world war, and tens of millions of dead to establish. Why do they propose this? There is obviously a commercial motivation: a remilitarized Germany and Japan are massive new defense-software markets. But the more troubling answer is that point 15 fits into the ideological project the rest of the manifesto lays out - a civilizational contest requires a consolidated Western bloc, and pacifist members are a liability in such a contest. So taking a step back we now have what's the most influential defense-software company in the world, with its code deeply embedded in all the machinery of Western states - intelligence agencies, militaries, police forces, welfare systems, border controls - openly outing itself as an ideological project. They're effectively saying "our tools aren't meant to serve your foreign policy. They're meant to enforce ours." Because, worryingly, that's what they CAN do. Palantir software is all about basically telling states: "these are your threats, these are the people and groups to watch, these are the patterns that matter, these are the targets that warrant action." For instance the DGSI - the French intelligence services - use Palantir (see: x.com/RnaudBertrand/…): do you honestly think the software is warning them about, say, the NSA tapping the phones of French government officials? About the weaponization of US extraterritorial law against French companies? Did it warn them about the AUKUS ambush that cost France a sixty-billion-euro submarine contract? Obviously not. And that's exactly what the manifesto is saying. They've positioned themselves as advocates of Western civilizational unity, so their software can't undermine it. The ideological position and the product roadmap have to align, or the whole project falls apart. This makes their software not only deeply dangerous for the world as a whole but also, almost by definition, for any country using it. When it comes to your security as a state, it is primordial you base yourself on truth as opposed to ideology. The entire point of an intelligence agency is to tell its government what is true, not what your so-called "allies'" defense contractors would like you to see. A state that outsources its threat assessment to a company with an explicit ideological agenda is not gathering intelligence, it is essentially subscribing to propaganda. The conclusion couldn't be more obvious. Every government still running Palantir software in its intelligence, security, or public-service infrastructure needs to start ripping it out, now! Lest they want to be embarked on the delusional and deeply destructive clash-of-civilizations crusade Palantir has now openly committed itself to.
Palantir@PalantirTech

Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief. 1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation. 2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible. 3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public. 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. 5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed. 6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost. 7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way. 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. 11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice. 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. 13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet. 14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war. 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia. 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. 17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives. 18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within. 19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. 21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful. 22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what? Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska techrepublicbook.com

English
330
5.2K
13.4K
947.5K
TheRealQuarts retweetledi
Der Gepardkommandant
Der Gepardkommandant@gepardtatze·
Palantir raus. Überall. Sofort!
Palantir@PalantirTech

Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief. 1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation. 2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible. 3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public. 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. 5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed. 6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost. 7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way. 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. 11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice. 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. 13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet. 14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war. 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia. 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. 17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives. 18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within. 19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. 21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful. 22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what? Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska techrepublicbook.com

Deutsch
125
857
5.2K
238.2K
TheRealQuarts retweetledi
Joseph Webster 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇨🇦
23. Companies should not be publishing manifestos on how our societies should operate and function. The act of private companies attempting to take on the role of government and/or policy construction should be seen as a threat to national security and the Western way of life. Unless Palantir or others are willing to accept direct democratic oversight and accountability, they should remain entirely outside of the realm of policy formation or decision-making. We are a freedom-loving people with values, principles, and rights that are not gifted to us by government, or corporations, or narcissistic drug addicts suffering from god complexes. If corporations will not or cannot understand this, and stand in support of fundamental Western values (free speech, privacy, individual liberty, etc.) they should be broken up or temporarily nationalised in order to bring them back under direct democratic accountability and control, and until new laws and/or constitutional amendments can be made to protect free citizens from infringements on their god-given rights.
English
143
1.9K
28.1K
628.4K
TheRealQuarts retweetledi
🌺🌸🇺🇸✝️MAR✝️🇺🇸🌸🌺
Isn’t this the truth… The ones putting in the real work get overlooked, while the less qualified climb the ladder. And the wild part? The hardworking ones are usually the same people who trained them. That’s not just frustrating… that’s straight-up disrespect.
English
25
153
652
29.2K
TheRealQuarts retweetledi
WarTranslated
WarTranslated@wartranslated·
Europe can't match Russia without Ukraine and Turkey, Zelensky says. If the US leaves NATO, the EU will have to handle its own security – and it's not ready. Russia plans to expand its army to 2.5 million by 2030.
English
26
171
1.6K
114.5K
TheRealQuarts retweetledi
TheRealQuarts retweetledi
Dwayne
Dwayne@CtrlAltDwayne·
Seeing people finally wake up to Lex Fridman is beautiful. This guy gets top tier geniuses on his show and asks them stuff like "so what even is a computer?" Every time. For years. And we just let him get away with it.
Dwayne tweet media
English
144
75
2.1K
107.7K
TheRealQuarts retweetledi
Tareq Alotaiba طارق العتيبة
The UAE has always been generous with its friends and supportive of its allies. In a time of war some “friends” stayed silent, and others even supported the enemy. A few however stepped up and showed real support. As an Emirati, thank you. #SlavaUkraïni 🇺🇦
English
21
76
815
32.5K
TheRealQuarts retweetledi
Miles Taylor
Miles Taylor@MilesTaylorUSA·
BREAKING: WSJ reports Russia is giving intelligence to Iran to hit U.S. forces. Meanwhile, Trump has lifted sanctions on Russia, allowing them to sell more oil. So…we are basically paying Putin to kill our troops. Let THAT sink in.
English
818
6.7K
18.8K
321.2K
TheRealQuarts retweetledi
Igor Sushko
Igor Sushko@igorsushko·
Now we're talking. ✊
Chris Cappy@Cappyarmy

@thearnabsarkar If we are really serious about controlling ALL THE WORLDS OIL….its time to join forces with UKRAINE and take Russias refineries . As equals .

English
4
32
293
13.2K
TheRealQuarts retweetledi
isHaHaHa
isHaHaHa@hajarkagalwa·
Germans when they realise they are not going to be blamed for World War III
English
1.2K
19.7K
313.7K
7.1M
TheRealQuarts retweetledi
Michael McFaul
Michael McFaul@McFaul·
@nexta_tv He should be a professional weightlifter, not a Secretary of Defense.
English
81
76
2.7K
39.8K
TheRealQuarts retweetledi
Darth Putin
Darth Putin@DarthPutinKGB·
Day 1417 of my 3 day war. My invasion has now lasted longer than our war with Nazi Germany. With American supplies & Ukrainian soldiers helping, they advanced 1800km in that time. We have managed about 60. I remain a master strategist.
English
86
678
4.3K
158.4K