Qubicon

@honneypaws @QuayeRoyal @ZELLKLUMPEN Again feeling pain is not a criteria for human life. Killing someone painlessly is still murder

@Qubicon2 @QuayeRoyal @ZELLKLUMPEN Those feel pain, a fetus that’s developing doesn’t until a specific stage. That’s where it’s illegal to abort.

@honneypaws @QuayeRoyal @ZELLKLUMPEN 1 year olds don't really have those either, and the same with people in comas. Those are not the criteria for human life

@Qubicon2 @QuayeRoyal @ZELLKLUMPEN Slaves were humans with autonomy and consciousness. A fetus doesn’t have any of both.

@Skayla76667965 @bobbling_wacho @Varca_Owner And that apparently means he shouldn't start above cherki, dembele, and doue for some reason

@bobbling_wacho @Varca_Owner Harry Kane and Olise are have a better season than Mbappe with way more trophies and Stats

There is no way Kylian Mbappe is going to start ahead of Players like Cherki, Dembele, Olise and Doue in the world cup.

@CheeseMaestr0 @GenocideKidnap @nell_midpu @reeceollld The thing is there are real cannibal tribes TODAY in papua new guinea

@GenocideKidnap @nell_midpu @reeceollld you are rotten to the core omg son

nigga this is the most racist shit i ever seen in my life😭😭😭

@QuayeRoyal @ZELLKLUMPEN "they're not really humans"

@ZELLKLUMPEN Actually, no enslaved person ever was a fetus developing within a woman's body, so no arguments that were used to justify slavery are comparable to the arguments we use to defend a woman's right to terminate a pregnancy.

@userexistsz @Joshua__Ubeku Nah he was trying to block it with his shoulder

@Joshua__Ubeku Did he dodge the ball? 😂 that guy in the wall

This is Messi’s best free-kick EVER!!! 🥵

@BGG01642868 @herdmansdrone @GunnerPuls Antoinne and rabiot but that's basically it

@herdmansdrone @GunnerPuls They not have a white guy!

Which football club is this?

@Altacnt21 @NataniaMarshall The desire to masturbate is not an action. The desire to have gay sex is not an action. Neither is wrong. Masturbating and having gay sex are sins. But again, literally everyone commits sins, so hating someone for a specific sin they commit is considered hypocrisy in Christianity

@Qubicon2 @NataniaMarshall Masterbation is an action. It’s something you can choose to do. Who you are naturally attracted to is not an action. If I said liking the color blue is a moral failure you’d rightfully point out that’s not something I should be able to be against.

You can’t be a Christian and support homosexuality. You also can’t be a Christian and hate gay people.

@Altacnt21 @NataniaMarshall Ok then let's start at the beginning. I can be against masturbation, but not hate people who masterbate, even if they consider it to be an integral part of their life and identity.

@Qubicon2 @NataniaMarshall No matter how many times you ignore the cheated on partner it doesn’t suddenly make it count as only 2 people. You need to learn and own up to when you misunderstood an argument. You misunderstood me at every turn. Take a deep breath and reevaluate what I’ve been telling you

@Altacnt21 @NataniaMarshall if "2 consenting and unrelated adults" are in love and one of them is cheating to be in that relationship, that doesn't somehow invalidate its membership in that category, no matter how many times you say it does

@Qubicon2 @NataniaMarshall I’m not playing dumb. I’m saying the 3rd person is the one who doesn’t consent. What I said in my comment was “2 consenting unrelated adults” and what you apparently read was “at least 2 unrelated adults who consent”. So for the the 4th or 5th time. CHEATING IS NOT INCLUDED HERE

@Altacnt21 @NataniaMarshall Brother the fact that a 3rd party doesn't consent has NO effect on whether the love between 2 cheating partners is consensual. You seem to think that it magically makes it not real, which ofc is retarded. Every time I point that out you play dumb

@Qubicon2 @NataniaMarshall No. You didn’t. I said something about love. You immediately went on a tangent about sex. Which while yes the 2 concepts are connected they are still 2 distinct concepts. Instead of assuming you know a person’s point better than they do maybe listen when they tell you

@Altacnt21 @NataniaMarshall I directly counter your argument and you call it an unrelated tangent because you literally don't know what you're talking about

@Qubicon2 @NataniaMarshall I understand my argument perfectly. It’s you who keeps going off on unrelated tangents. I’m not talking about sex so stop bringing that up. I’m not talking about situations with more than 2 people so stop bringing those up. Argue against my point. not a straw man

@Altacnt21 @NataniaMarshall And you just seem not to understand your own argument aswell

@Qubicon2 @NataniaMarshall Ok at this point you must either have the memory of a dementia patient or the literacy of a toddler because I have told you 3 times already I’m not talking about sex.

@Altacnt21 @NataniaMarshall Brother the 3rd party isn't involved in the sex. The sex is consensual between two unrelated adults. It 100% falls under the category

@Qubicon2 @NataniaMarshall It’s not when the definition I gave required exclusively 2 parties and they both consent. You brought up a situation with 3 or more people and at least 1 doesn’t consent. It’s comparing apples to oranges. Yeah they both include 2 consenting parties but mine is exclusively 2

@pxrcyishim @benefitmind German domestic cup

@benefitmind I don’t understand

3rd career title? Second bundesliga? Thought they said he did not win anything at Tottenham?

@Altacnt21 @NataniaMarshall A non consenting 3rd party is obviously irrelevant

@Qubicon2 @NataniaMarshall Ok dude. For the 4th time. Cheating is NOT included in the list of consensual 2 party, non insest relationships because it requires at least 1 non consenting 3rd party. I need you to stop bringing it it up or I’m gonna start thinking you simply can’t understand this

@Altacnt21 @NataniaMarshall What if you are in love with the person with whom you are cheating?

@Qubicon2 @NataniaMarshall You’re conflating love and sex again. I’m not talking about sex. I’m talking about love. And cheating is nonconsensual to the 3rd person involved. It DOES NOT fall under the category. I’ll ask this: do you know there’s a difference between love and sex?

@Altacnt21 @NataniaMarshall You said "defining a consensual love between 2 unrelated adults as a moral evil is the decision of a god not worthy of worship." Since cheating also falls under this category, and it's also obviously wrong, your argument is inconsistent

@Qubicon2 @NataniaMarshall It is not. Despite the word “sexuality” being a part of homosexuality it’s not actually about sex. It is simply the result of how the average person combines the concepts of romantic and sexual attraction into just sexual attraction.

@Altacnt21 @NataniaMarshall Your response to op was about sex

@Qubicon2 @NataniaMarshall And like I literally just said I wasn’t talking about sex. I was talking about love. So either your response was off topic or you don’t know the difference between love and sex and that’s deeply sad.

@Altacnt21 @NataniaMarshall My point is that consensual sex can be wrong under certain circumstances. Cheating is one of them

@Qubicon2 @NataniaMarshall The bad part of cheating isn’t the sex. It’s the lying and sneaking to circumvent the consent of the partner. The sex itself is neutral. Besides I wasn’t talking about sex. I was talking about relationships.