Quinnqade

@6Hell6Fire6Joe6 Wait what? Foamy is still around?

"Medicinal Mochaccino" 🤣

@VerglasW @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer Read the whole fucking thing dunce-burger.

@Quinnqade @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer If you just wanna lie that’s fine.

pq as femcels e os incels não namoram entre si?

@VerglasW @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer Hey, shit for brains, look at the data point that shows that even though they are rating men less attractive, the rate at which they message men is not to the top like the men's is. Your data point is irrelevant in practice/follow-through.

@Quinnqade @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer This is a simpler chart for what the data means dickhead

@VerglasW @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer You've given 0 data for your side. I even cited a source that proved a negative point against your claim on a dating site, not even in real life.

@Quinnqade @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer Also without sourcing the prompt and the methods or data collection it means nothing, and you’ve refused to provide that. I might as well have typed it up at Imadeitthefuckup.orj and screenshot it.

@VerglasW @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer It actually doesn't. There's more data bucko. You instantly tunnel visioned. The female hypergamy curve is healthier than the male one.

@Quinnqade @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer This data proves my point about hypergamy! This is literally saying women chose much higher than men while men choose on a bell curve. Boiled down men rate most women at a 5/10, and women rate most men 1-2’s.

@VerglasW @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer I literally screenshotted the output. You've provided nothing, at all.

@Quinnqade @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer Okay. Then I’ll say I looked it up and my data contradicts your claim. But I’m not gonna provide it.

@VerglasW @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, and looks like a duck, it's a duck.

@Quinnqade @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer That doesn’t show the reason. Your claim would only negate mine if your reasoning -women are just looking for an attractive hookup- if you can prove that is their reason. The incidental hookups WHILE looking for a relationship would only work to prove my claim of hypergamy.

@VerglasW @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer All the while, asking me to prove both my positive and your negative.

@VerglasW @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer 70% + the previous data point of 84%, saying they used it at least once for a hookup. You just don't want to be wrong at this point. This is not about showing you the evidence, and then you'll be convinced on your end. This is about you "winning." You've shared no data.

@VerglasW @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer As for an IRL data source to back up the answer to my prompt, I can't find one in 10 minutes, so do it yourself.

@VerglasW @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer Here's a source that uses a dating site to disprove your claim. archive.ph/2017.01.21-154…

@VerglasW @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer 3-4 hookups on average before you get into a serious relationship. That is (70%), which is a super majority and pretty close to the 84% that admit to using it at least once to hook up. Use your own prompts to search. You will find I haven't lied about the data.

@Quinnqade @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer Aside from the data, which I will grant, I’d just personally like it to read through. This still would not prove that those on the dating app are using it to hookup. Only that they do hookup. Your claim was they were on the sight ‘to hookup’

@VerglasW @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer 1 out of every 5 meetups ends up in a hookup. The average dating site user has 1-2 meetups per month. 1.6 out of every 20 meetups leads to a long-term relationship. That means a user spends an average of 20 months on a dating app to get a relationship after hooking up w/ 3-4.

@VerglasW @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer Since you're just going to waste my time and make me prove the negative of your claim.

@VerglasW @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer I'm not saying women don't date up. No, you don't get to extrapolate a weaker claim when you don't afford an extrapolation of a stronger claim. It is not up to me to prove both the positive of my claim and the negative of your claim. Prove your own positive.

@Quinnqade @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer Then please provide data countering my data sources. I can provide the dating site statistics if you don’t believe my claim about women dating up. I think you and I both know that’s just a google search away for me. If you insist.

@roguedrifter84 @LumLotus Maybe I have it mixed up on which syndrome has had a few rare cases with female-only external genitals. As I said, I'm basing the gender I'd declare a baby looking at it out of the womb. Male genitals=boy, female genitals=girl, both genitals=boy w/hermaphrodism.

@Quinnqade @LumLotus Yet they always are hermaphrotitic OR have some measure of male genetaila. AFAIK there wasn't any without male genetalia. Just suppresed (internal or malformed) male genetalia. A few cases still have the penis internal. The male still overrides the female.

A. Male B. Male C. Male D. Male E. Female F. Female, Female, Female, Female G. Female

@VerglasW @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer 75% of women under 30 do not stay on dating apps for more than 3 months. Only 53% of women aged 18-30 try it, in total.

@Quinnqade @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer Possibly, but you seem to be indicating the only factor that matters in the dating market is your income. I think we both know that isn’t the case. And you didn’t counter that my claim could be the case even if it is minority. Multiply that by -how many trade jobs?

@VerglasW @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer I'm talking about 25% of women under 30 who stay on dating apps for more than 3 months. I am not talking about 25% of all women being under 30.

@Quinnqade @CaseyDoe8 @paleochristcon @sfluizawer I’d just counter that the women under 18 and over 45 are irrelevant to the topic of dating.

@roguedrifter84 @LumLotus If I'm a doctor and I pull the baby from the womb without knowing its chromosomes, and I don't see external testes or a penis, but see a vagina, I would announce the baby as a girl to the mother.

@roguedrifter84 @LumLotus Ok. I said in the circumstances of Kleinfelter, where the baby is born without male genitalia, I would define their gender as female. In the majority of cases where they had male genitalia, I would define them as male. What are we arguing?