DR.Quiver85

@cmills4370 @itscorasm The Amish are exempt for religious reasons. They do not draw SS during retirement age.

@itscorasm Now what about the Amish? They collect it and do not hold jobs that pay except cash. How are they entitled to social security if they never paid into it?

🚨Trump just said 275,000 illegal aliens have been KICKED OFF Social Security! This is what I voted for.

@ShishirShelke1 Didn't even run Linux lol They deserve to die

Artemis II crew is thousands of miles away from Earth And they’re asking ground crew for help because they have two versions of Microsoft Outlook open and neither is working This scene is now canon 😭

Terrifying revelation. A prominent British journalist concludes that Israel's cruel closures and economic strangulation are a deliberate attempt to drive Christians completely out of Jerusalem and Palestine. It is a systematic ethnic cleansing of the Holy Land.

Democrat fundraising giant ActBlue is accepting foreign campaign contributions. THAT is real foreign election interference. Are the Russia hoax believers upset about this REAL election interference?

@TomCottonAR Been saying it for years RICO Actblue

The New York Times just confirmed what we've long suspected: ActBlue knowingly let in fraudulent foreign donations to help Democrats win. Yet another example of the left's embrace of fraud. Everyone involved must face the full weight of the law.

The Israel First Tax is rising

If you decide to pull your child from public school and homeschool your child You should get the full $13,000 for your child that would have been spent on your child in public school

"You* will eat the bugs" *Jews not included

HOLY SHIT !!! 👀💥 Israeli man tries to seize a house in NYC like it’s the West Bank. They bring their theft wherever they go. No city, no country is off-limits to their entitlement.

Imagine being an elected official in Florida and openly admitting you took legislative orders from a foreign country. Randy Fine just did that-bragging that campus censorship and anti-BDS laws were 'signed in Israel.

People in the U.S. don't have children because they're already supporting other people's children with free healthcare, free K-12 public schools, free college scholarships, subsidized housing, welfare, Medicaid, food stamps, and more. Every "childfree" 30something has 5 or 6 young Somali, Central American, or Afghan dependents they'll never meet

@OmolewaAbraham Tesla doesn't lay off 1/2 their workforce and get h1bs who never did those jobs

Lol, there was an Harvard study showing divorce rates rise by 33% when a man loses his job, while it’s insignificant for girlies.

Think about this; Somalis stole billions from tax payer nonprofits ment for starving children and the IRS isn’t prosecuting them.

JUST IN: Israeli guy tries to confiscate a man’s house in New York City in broad daylight. Do jews think they can settle anywhere?

El hecho de que Roald Dahl era un crítico acérrimo de Israel y escribió "The Witches", un cuento donde mujeres narizonas pertenecen a una secta global, tienen una fundación que según ayuda a niños, pero matan bebés y niños.

JUST IN: 🇮🇱🇮🇷 Netanyahu admits that he started the war on Iran in order to transform Israel into a supernation We are working on transforming Israel into a supernation in the region and globally.

Just so we're clear, Israel is now the first state to have an ethnicity-based death penalty since Nazi Germany.

I was told this was an antisemitic conspiracy - a blood libel even.

Blacks explaining the law be like: “Imagine if you’re stealing a wallet”

To settle the debate over birthright citizenship and the 14th Amendment once & for all, I'm hereby posting the vast majority of the Senate's ratifying debate from May 30, 1866. (Thanks for ChatGPT for spending the last few hours helping me transcribe dozens of screenshots from the original congressional record.) The transcript runs around 22 pages & it's possible there are some typos, but I'll summarize it briefly: The amendment's author, Sen. Jacob M. Howard, said his purpose in crafting the birthright citizenship clause was to create a standard policy across the United States, premised largely on some states' resistance to enabling newly freed blacks to become fully active members of the body politic. Noting the provision's specific application to freed blacks, Delaware's Sen. Willard Saulsbury said: "I do not presume that any one will pretend to disguise the fact that the object of this first section is simply to declare that negroes shall be citizens of the United States. There can be no other object in it, I presume, than a further extension of the legislative kindness and beneficence of Congress toward that class of people." Sen. Howard emphasized from the beginning that birthright citizenship would not apply to anyone born in the United States whose parents were not entirely under American jurisdiction: "[E]very person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of person." Note here that he's listing various classes of people the provision would not apply to — foreigners, aliens, children of ambassadors or foreign ministers; the word "or" clearly indicates he's listing various groups, not grouping them all into the ambassador category, as some have falsely claimed online. Maryland Sen. Reverdy Johnson likewise emphasized the provision would not apply to children whose parents were still subject to another country. "Now, all this amendment provides is, that all persons born in the United States and not subject to some foreign Power—for that, no doubt, is the meaning of the committee who have brought the matter before us—shall be considered as citizens of the United States ... If there are to be citizens of the United States entitled everywhere to the character of citizens of the United States, there should be some certain definition of what citizenship is, what has created the character of citizen as between himself and the United States, and the amendment says citizenship may depend upon birth, and I know of no better way to give rise to citizenship than the fact of birth within the territory of the United States, born of parents who at the time were subject to the authority of the United States" After this assurance, the debate moved to Gypsies and Chinese people in California, and concern they may game the system to overtake the domestic population. These groups were singled out as examples of peoples not automatically entitled to citizenship merely for being born within the territorial United States, and modern progressives are officially trigger warned upon reading this section. The debate then moved to Indians, and once again there you'll see agreement that Indians that owed allegiance to a tribe would not be American citizens simply by virtue of being born in U.S. soil. However, the senators did say "civilized" Indians — i.e., those trying to become Americans — could. Sen. Howard: "Indians born within the limits of the United States, and who maintain their tribal relations, are not, in the sense of this amendment, born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. They are regarded, and always have been in our legislation and jurisprudence, as being quasi foreign nations." Illinois' Senator Lyman Trumbull concurred: "I have already replied to the suggestion as to the Indians being subject to our jurisdiction. They are not subject to our jurisdiction in the sense of owing allegiance solely to the United States; and the Senator from Maryland, if he will look into our statutes, will search in vain for any means of trying these wild Indians. A person can only be tried for a criminal offense in pursuance of laws, and he must be tried in a district which must have been fixed by law before the crime was committed. We have had in this country, and have today, a large region of country within the territorial limits of the United States, unorganized, over which we do not pretend to exercise any civil or criminal jurisdiction, where wild tribes of Indians roam at pleasure, subject to their own laws and regulations, and we do not pretend to interfere with them. They would not be embraced by this provision. For these reasons I think this language is better than the language employed by the civil rights bill [which had recently been passed]." Sen. Howard repeatedly emphasized the importance of birthright citizenship only applying when BOTH parents were fully under American jurisdiction, not owing loyalty to any other country/tribe/etc.: "If there are to be citizens of the United States entitled everywhere to the character of citizens of the United States, there should be some certain definition of what citizenship is, what has created the character of citizen as between himself and the United States, and the amendment says that citizenship may depend upon birth, and I know of no better way to give rise to citizenship than the fact of birth within the territory of the United States, born of parents who at the time were subject to the authority of the United States. "I am, however, by no means prepared to say, as I think I have intimated before, that being born within the United States, independent of any new constitutional provision on the subject, creates the relation of citizen to the United States." Oregon's Senator George Henry Williams echoed this key point that the provision applies to children whose parents are under the jurisdiction of the United States and the United States only: "In one sense, all persons born within the geographical limits of the United States are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, but they are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States in every sense. Take the child of an ambassador. In one sense, that child born in the United States is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, because if that child commits the crime of murder, or commits any other crime against the laws of the country, to a certain extent he is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, but not in every respect; and so with these Indians. All persons living within a judicial district may be said, in one sense, to be subject to the jurisdiction of the court in that district, but they are not in every sense subject to the jurisdiction of the court until they are brought, by proper process, within the reach of the power of the court. I understand the words here, "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States," to mean fully and completely subject to the jurisdiction of the United States." Read through the whole debate. You won't find anyone arguing that this birthright citizenship provision would apply to anyone born within the territorial United States automatically. Before I paste the text, here's a link to the original source: babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=osu.…