𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠

32.4K posts

𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠 banner
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠

𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠

@R0dchenko

Enemy of culture and civilization

Katılım Şubat 2024
674 Takip Edilen2.1K Takipçiler
Lyra Chastain
Lyra Chastain@femternational·
@transhevik AmBol i think represents basically a hyperexaggrated version of what a lot of online 'leftcoms' trend to, but no way in hell would you see someone in a org or otherwise engaging with them that would act like this
English
3
6
59
2K
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠@R0dchenko·
I got this on my lunch break yesterday is it gem or coal
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠 tweet media
English
35
13
494
25.3K
Jojoenthusiast 🇵🇸
Jojoenthusiast 🇵🇸@Jojos17thvilain·
@CouncilFem Like don’t get me wrong, MarxistStoner is much worse because he is a utopian dreamer and he’s the problem because at the end of the day he is a panleftist, but if you’re gonna ideology shop at least do it properly and stop making alternative fictional scenarios where your getting
English
2
0
2
114
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠@R0dchenko·
@eusoueupriv Second part is probably true but that’s true of like, literally everyone who ever wrote anything
English
0
0
20
282
sipo 🇺🇦🍉💛🩷
@polen_ball @R0dchenko well his "mistakes" were deliberately suppressing the workers and peasants' aspirations for a better political and social system not sure if it can be called "mistakes" at this point
English
1
0
0
45
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠@R0dchenko·
The idea that the Communist Left has ever advocated for a “perfect” or “pure” revolution is a fabricated myth. NO left-communist has EVER, in its history of over 100 years, advocated for or expected a “pure” or “perfect” revolution, what the hell does that even mean? The communist left has strongly defended the experience of the October revolution, and not one of us has ever claimed that it was perfect, quite the opposite. We criticize the Bolsheviks, in particular Lenin, for tactical errors which ended up leaving the door open for opportunism, while at the same time we recognize Lenin as the greatest anti opportunist figure of the 20th century. The difference between us and our “critics” is that we are capable of understanding and applying the principle of ruthlessly criticizing all that exists, including our own experiences, and that we also understand that the first premise of human history is production, specifically the productive activity that reproduces its own existence, and that the activity of the communist revolution must be to transform the social relations which govern production. The revolution will not and cannot succeed without this.
English
7
23
155
4.9K
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠@R0dchenko·
@eRegimeforum Dude when the claims you make directly contradict the more basic writings of left communists it’s a safe assumption that you haven’t read them, that doesn’t require omnipotence
English
1
0
0
34
eRegime
eRegime@eRegimeforum·
@R0dchenko Again acting as if you have godlike powers of discernment as to what I read or don't read.
English
1
0
0
45
Alain Beidou
Alain Beidou@avispartan1·
@R0dchenko @DJProfessorL It's a whiny far-right chud movement that wants to jail all trans people and colonize the third world to 'liberate their women', the fact that you have such deep connections to it exposes what you actually are.
English
1
0
0
151
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠@R0dchenko·
I’m not a radical feminist, or a feminist in general, but self declared anti-radfems are typically some of the dumbest fucking people on the face of the earth
English
4
1
68
2.4K
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠@R0dchenko·
@eRegimeforum Your only critique was “you haven’t seen anyone else say that before” instead of making an actual argument about why it was wrong on its merits, not really much to respond to there
English
1
0
0
40
eRegime
eRegime@eRegimeforum·
@R0dchenko I have read Bordiga (albeit not systematically), in another comment I pointed out his asinine take on the USSR's machine-tractor stations supposedly exploiting proletarians on behalf of the kolkhozy. Go ahead and respond to that.
English
1
0
0
35
eRegime
eRegime@eRegimeforum·
@R0dchenko I'm not interested in arguing with you about left-communism, certainly not on Twitter with its word limits. My original point was to note your demagogy, that is all.
English
1
0
0
20
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠@R0dchenko·
@eRegimeforum Again, you have not read Bordiga, or any left communist, and you’re somehow arguing against us and supposed positions we hold
English
1
0
1
28
eRegime
eRegime@eRegimeforum·
@R0dchenko I'm no Trotskyist and neither were the authors of the two books I mentioned, and the notion that I'm the one who doesn't read things I disagree with is obviously false; if you can divine my lifestyle and knowledge, you should be able to divine my wider Internet activity.
English
1
0
0
25
eRegime
eRegime@eRegimeforum·
@R0dchenko Your point was that "the Communist left" do not envision a "pure" revolution, which sure sounds nice. My point is that you're engaging in demagogy, because the problem is how left-coms understand the specifics of revolutions and the transition periods, not abstract "purity."
English
1
0
0
22
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠@R0dchenko·
@eRegimeforum Trotsky was a complete moron on this point in particular yep, I know, because I actually read things I disagree with
English
1
0
1
22
eRegime
eRegime@eRegimeforum·
@R0dchenko I don't want to argue within the limits of Twitter's obnoxious word limits, but "The Myth of Capitalism Reborn" and "Is the Red Flag Flying" are two works you could consult. Even "ortho" Trots like Trotsky himself and Mandel could point to the vacuousness of "USSR = capitalism."
English
1
0
0
31
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠@R0dchenko·
@eRegimeforum Okay, so if you think my point is wrong, find me a left communist who has said what you claim
English
1
0
0
18
eRegime
eRegime@eRegimeforum·
@R0dchenko You were the one speaking on behalf of "the Communist Left" in your first post. You then anointed Bordiga the "ambassador" of left-communism. I did neither.
English
1
0
0
25
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠
𝙉𝙞𝙘𝙠@R0dchenko·
@eRegimeforum I mean you admitted to not actually reading the thing you’re attempting to critique so I can deduce from that, that you are actually pretty lazy yeah
English
1
0
0
33
eRegime
eRegime@eRegimeforum·
@R0dchenko I am the account of a lazybones who has scanned thousands of books (and admittedly needs to get to work scanning more laying around) and who is working on a book. But I understand having second thoughts about your ability to divine my life and knowledge from one or two posts.
English
1
0
0
39