RAHN23

@wanderjegson El punto

Link, Zelda and Ganondorf through the years

@NoobMas26644116 @thelifeofoxa @Recort131 Se sabrá dentro de poco (espero) y de igual forma no vas a comparar un loco mal diagnosticado que anda hablando pendejadas con uno que mata y viola, o sí?

@thelifeofoxa @Recort131 Y como sabemos que todos esos no están locos y maldiagnosticados??

Me perdí un toque, que se supone que hizo Anne Hathaway aparte de ser del Arsenal

@ibu_ch1 Podrías ser quien fuera, ese no es el problema, el problema es la gente que por UN POSTER ya anda hablando mierda de esa persona PENSANDO QUE ES HOMBRE, pero se retractan cuando ven que es una mujer; por qué sería diferente?

soy mujer, no un GORDO DE 4CHAN ultima vez que lo repito. déjenme tener mis posters de mis monas chinas en paz infelices

@cowboylike_g @OmarGuerra1750 @luzu_zu30005 Nobara literalmente confirma que quiere un novio? Tienes retraso?

@OmarGuerra1750 @luzu_zu30005 caitlyn y vi son novias confirmado por el CANON, en jujutsu kaisen no hay ninguna sexualidad ni pareja confirmada aparte de yuki y maki o hakari y kirara, si dijera que por ejemplo yo tengo el headcanon de que kirara es hombre cis eso afecta al canon pq kirara es una mujer TRANS

itadori es bisexual megumi es gay nobara es lesbiana gojo es bisexual geto es gay shoko es lesbiana maki es bisexual yuta es hetero choso es pansexual toji es homofobico (igual tuvo una homoerotic friendship con inu)

Pendejo de mierda, soy biologo y si se puede forzar una ereccion aun que el hombre no sienta deseo sexual, esta la estimulacion del pene o del punto G para forzarla, pinche pajero

@Demifemcel No tiene verificado...

@GregtheGnome @ihatemeen_ @jemiene_kay I don't think you understand the meaning of Infinite. Cecil can recreate what Armstrong did but better, he has UNLIMITED TIME to search in INFINITES universes, he can have INFINITE viltrumites to work for him, Infinite reanimen, infinite bomba, ANYTHING

@ihatemeen_ @jemiene_kay I mean yeah, you gave him infinite time but then you also put him up against 50 billion Thraggs, bro, even 50 billion Olivers would be unstoppable, do you know what 50 billion looks like but tbh this is a bait post, so well done lol

who's winning this?

@Jay_Andr3w @NICOarts10 @HollowStrokes Estás wey o qué? Si invencible hiciera crossover con Superman pasaría lo mismo

@NICOarts10 @HollowStrokes Es mas de lo que podría hacer todo el Invincible verso sea como sea

Homelander vs kid omniman 🗣️

@matarobot27 A ver tarados Thragg mata a Gojo PERO El infinito no deja pasar NADA, independientemente si tiene energía maldita o no (todos los seres tienen energía maldita) El dominio de Gojo no hay personaje sin hax que lo tanquee, todos quedan inmóviles

@JoeyRiz @_greywithin And Omni Man don't? Literally went on a mission to exterminate his race WTF are you on dude 😭😭😭

@_greywithin Vegeta strived to be better ever since we met him. He’s a very different character.

I find it weird how these two characters followed almost the exact same path, same choices, same growth but somehow Vegeta keeps dodging the criticism he absolutely deserves

@DC38139359 @_greywithin Yeah, that took him the whole series. You will be crazy when you find out what Omni man does at the end of his series...

@_greywithin Vegeta by this point in the story has atoned for his past sins. He literally killed himself KNOWING he would’ve gone to hell just to take Majin Buu with him so the earth and his family would be safe.

@LeesiBB Maybe, JUST MAYBE it's because one was still on his mission to redeem himself and the other was already redeemed? You fucking idiot

vegeta would never call bulma a pet. vegeta would never cheat on bulma. vegeta raised all his children. vegeta is so much better than that bum nolan in husband/father terms it’s not even funny lol

@fool44922022 @MxQuiquebm @kksposting @Mashiro_yuh @Erivlt Lo que tú estás describiendo encaja mejor bajo el término de "emprendedor", con CEO la gente en todo el mundo (menos asia, por lo que parece) se refieren a dueños de empresas millonarias

@MxQuiquebm @kksposting @Mashiro_yuh @Erivlt 日本のCEOは往々にして、現場で働く労働者でもあります。日本の企業の大半を占める中小企業では特にその傾向が強い。 CEO＝超富裕層と認識される海外とはそこが大きく異なる。 新人社員とCEOの給料の違いが10倍もないことも珍しくない。 その定義で言えば、日本には「富裕層」はごく僅かです。

Japoneses cuando les dices que sus jefes abusan de ellos y les pagan una miseria:

@Ramirez12356M Wn ya no es cosa ni de entender el realismo ficticio de la película, EL POST PUSO "REALISMO", ENTRE COMILLAS, NO SABES LEER!!???!?!

Simon bro una araña de piedra es lo mas realista que nos dio el cine de ciencia ficcion es mas vi 5 de ellas pasearse por mi casa.

@KkisMankK @83434df @Mashiro_yuh @rakua_aisabori Llevan la paz pero porque andan lavados del cerebro

@83434df @Mashiro_yuh @rakua_aisabori Japón lleva en paz aproximadamente 80 años. A diferencia de muchos estados latinoamericanos o peor, africanos o del sudeste asiático. Es mucho tiempo para un país que sufrió la posguerra en carne junto a una crisis económica causado por la deflacion, a recuperarse y estabilizarse

海外の人の「海賊版を楽しむのは当たり前」は「大企業は信用ならない」文化が根底にあるっぽい。大企業というだけで敵だ！みたいな 少し前にあちらのインフルエンサー（？）が公共交通機関をただ乗りしまくる動画が拡散されて、日本人はみんな「許せん！」と言う感じだったのに、海外の反応が 「大企業（JRとかのこと？）に一泡吹かせてやった」 痛快動画として消費されてると聞いて本当にびっくりしたけど、今となっては「答え合わせ」された感じだなあ

@Renzo147369 @mustangJackMKII ???

@mustangJackMKII No creo que esto lo justifiqué porque pueden hacer esto sin la nececidad que Jor y Lara sean malvados

Esto👇

@Ron_Christian55 How can you criticize something that You don't consume? How can you call a good Bad if you never ate it? Are you retarded by any means?

Ashton “You’re not watching it, so why talk about it?” is such a weak deflection. By that logic, nobody can criticize anything unless they’re actively consuming it nonstop. That’s not how criticism works. People talk about trends, themes, and major story decisions all the time without needing to sit through every single episode like it’s some kind of obligation. I know enough, I know the direction the show takes. And I definitely know enough to comment on a major character decision—especially one that cuts straight to the core of what a superhero is supposed to represent. This isn’t “commentary for commentary’s sake.” That’s just a dismissive way of trying to shut the conversation down without actually engaging with the point. I brought it up because it’s a very specific writing choice that says a lot about the show and the kind of storytelling it leans into. Also, here’s the part you’re completely ignoring: I care about superhero storytelling as a whole. And whether I like it or not, Invincible is at the forefront of superhero storytelling right now. It’s one of the most talked-about, most visible, most influential shows in the genre. So yeah—I’m going to comment on it. I’m going to have opinions on it. Because what it does, the choices it makes, the tone it sets, that stuff shapes the direction of the genre. I don’t need to be actively watching every episode to recognize that. In fact, the reason I refuse to watch is because of things like this. That’s not a lack of engagement, that’s a direct reaction to the content. People ignore shows all the time because they don’t like the direction. Are they suddenly not allowed to talk about it ? Or is criticism only valid if you’re consuming the product? Because that sounds less like a real argument and more like gatekeeping. At the end of the day, I’m talking about it because it stood out as a moment that, in my opinion, completely undercuts the idea of heroism in a genre that used to be built on it. That’s worth discussing whether I’m watching the show or not. You don’t have to agree with me. That’s fine. But pretending I’m not allowed to have a strong opinion on something just because I’m not actively watching it? That’s not a rebuttal. That’s just avoiding the actual conversation.

I find it absolutely ironic that in a show that is supposedly about SUPERHEROES, about people who are meant to rise above normal human weakness and stand as symbols of hope, one of its central characters, Atom Eve, goes and has an abortion. And from everything that’s implied, that was Mark’s child. His kid. And he didn't even get a say. He was apparently… absent. And her response to that situation is basically, “Well, this is hard, so I’m just going to end it.” Let that sink in for a second. This is a character who is framed as compassionate, empathetic, morally grounded. A HERO. The kind of character we’re supposed to admire, look up to, maybe even feel inspired by. And yet when faced with the responsibility of protecting the most innocent, defenseless life imaginable—her own unborn child—she doesn’t rise to the occasion. She doesn’t fight through it. She doesn’t struggle and overcome. She doesn’t even try to embody that heroic ideal. She folds. Immediately. Because it’s difficult. Because she might have to do it alone. Because it would change her life. That’s it. That’s the line where her “heroism” just completely folds. And I’m supposed to sit here and accept that? I’m supposed to still see her as a hero after that? I’m supposed to root for her like nothing happened? No. Absolutely not. Because at that point, what even is the definition of a hero anymore? If someone who has the power to save lives on a massive scale can casually decide that the most vulnerable life imaginable isn’t worth protecting, then what are we even doing here? What’s the message? That heroism only applies when it’s convenient? That saving lives is optional depending on your personal circumstances? And before anyone jumps in with the usual defenses because I already know they’re coming...save it. I don’t care about the “context.” I don’t care about the “emotional complexity.” I don’t care about the essays explaining why it was “a deeply human decision” or “a realistic portrayal of struggle.” I’ve heard it all before. It’s the same recycled talking points every time something like this comes up. People bending over backwards, twisting themselves into knots, doing Olympic-level mental gymnastics just to justify something that completely undermines the very foundation of what these characters are supposed to represent. And that’s really the bigger issue here, isn’t it? This isn’t just about one character. This is about what modern “superhero” storytelling has become. Shows like Invincible don’t just tell stories—they go out of their way to tear down the idea of heroism itself. They take pride in it. They revel in it. There’s this smug, almost arrogant tone of “Look how mature we are because we’re deconstructing everything you used to love.” And what does that “deconstruction” look like? Ultra-violence. Endless gore. Heads exploding like water balloons. Limbs getting ripped off. Blood sprayed across the screen like it’s trying to win an award for how shocking it can be. And then on top of that, moral decisions that completely gut the idea of heroes being something aspirational. It’s like the show is actively allergic to sincerity. Like it can’t stand the idea of heroes being genuinely good, genuinely selfless, genuinely inspiring. Everything has to be twisted, darkened, or dragged through the mud in the name of being “realistic.” Being cynical doesn’t make something deep. Being brutal doesn’t make something meaningful. And tearing down ideals doesn’t make you smarter than the people who still believe in them. It just makes the whole thing feel hollow. And I look around and I still see people watching this. Still praising it. Still calling it “peak superhero storytelling.” And I honestly don’t get it. I really don’t. Why? What are you getting out of this? Is it the shock value? The gore? The constant subversion for the sake of subversion? The characters making decisions that completely contradict the idea of what a hero is supposed to be? Because from where I’m sitting, it just looks like people have been conditioned to accept this kind of thing as “normal” for the genre now. Like this is just what superheroes are supposed to be broken, compromised, morally inconsistent, and wrapped in layers of blood and cynicism. And if that’s the case, then yeah… I’ll pass. Go ahead. Defend it. I know some of you will. Go ahead and stutter through your explanations. Pull out the think pieces. Do your triple-axel somersaults of mental gymnastics to explain why this is actually brilliant, why it’s “nuanced,” why it’s “important storytelling.” Convince yourself that this is what heroism looks like now. But don’t expect me to buy into it. Because to me, this isn’t bold storytelling. It’s not deep. It’s not inspiring. It’s just another example of a genre losing sight of what made it worth caring about in the first place and expecting the audience to applaud while it happens.

Es por qué son la generación ZZZ y no la XXX

@JCande07 @BreadOficcial Todo el mundo sabía que Gojo se iba a morir

@BreadOficcial Eso que ni que, de por si creer que Gojo Satoru moriría en esa pelea se sentía como una locura. No me desagrada para nada el enfoque que le dio Gege al final del combate.

No jodan, esto sería literalmente el peak del panelling de Gege si lo hubiera incluído...