RASCOM
48 posts




When people say the Steele dossier has been “discredited” as intelligence, they typically mean that it failed to meet the standards expected of credible, actionable intelligence—not necessarily that everything in it was false. Now my other question was, how did the false stuff get there because Trump supporters will tell you Hillary came up with everything and that was false, probably even the unproven pee pee tape claim. Instead, it was Russian disinformation given to Christopher Steele. These are too huge points that get twisted around to make it look like Hillary purposely went after Trump with false accusations. Why the hell would someone want to do that knowing they were lying? It served no purpose. Especially after the dossier was only released after Trump won the election by the media. And so what, opposition research is normal. Roger Stone got hacked and they took from him a dossier on JD Vance. Lol





Why would I ever want a congressman who passes laws? Do you feel like we’re short on laws in this country? I am not a subject. I do not desire any laws from Congress.




















