R.L. Alitheia

@BethCHudson @JoeValaNYC @kingcarps @DavidAFrench @thescottbarber Then it should be easy for you to find a SINGLE quote or policy that opened the borders or supported them. I’ll wait.

@RLAlitheia @JoeValaNYC @kingcarps @DavidAFrench @thescottbarber Except he did.

Horrible. Hard to see this as anything other than retaliation.

@JoeValaNYC @kingcarps @DavidAFrench @thescottbarber Joe Biden didn’t support “open borders. Glad I could help.

Catholic Charities (the ones sanctioned by the bishops) support secure borders + humane treatment + legal reform. They do not support “open borders.” If you see claims that they do, those usually come from critics interpreting their humanitarian work as de-facto encouragement of illegal immigration. The organizations themselves, their websites, and the U.S. bishops’ statements are unambiguous on this point. Biden also supports abortions.

@gbrnole @noonecares215 @TravisL563971 @bennyjohnson The first states with Real ID were in 2010-11, and the final implementation date was 2025. Your “scheduled to be purged from voter rolls” is at the same time wildly misleading and vague. Certified birth certificates are part of the problem with SAVE. But otherwise, great comment.

REAL ID has been around since 2005. my last 3 driver's licenses have been REAL ID compliant (spanning almost 15 years). There's only 1 state in the US that allows you to renew your driver's license on a term exceeding 8 years, Arizona. Every other state is 8 years or less. You only need a REAL ID to vote. You need REAL ID and a certified birth certificate if you are a new voter registration. The only people scheduled to be purged from voter rolls are those who appear in the SAVE system, aliens. The SAVE system has been in place for four decades. Tens of millions of people need to access federal buildings and military bases. Just federal employees and military personnel alone is 4 million people before accounting for contractors, visitors and family members who need access.

I just went through TSA. Had to show my Government ID. Turns out — 90% of America have flown commercial and had to do the same thing. That’s +300 million people. If we can do it to fly we can do it to vote. Both must require absolute security. PASS the SAVE America Act 🇺🇸

@PoliUnLimited @sonicendeavor @jaketapper Or actually better than you, who straight up lied about what he said when it’s printed right there.

@sonicendeavor @jaketapper People misspeak esp when reading stats. It's better than when Kimmel straight up lied about the Kirk shooter was being some Republican.

California has a homelessness problem, with an estimated 187,000 homeless. California does not have 12 million homeless people.

@WilliamWolfe @BaptistLeaders @Phase2Deport Just like Jesus said and did!

Honored to lead @BaptistLeaders to join @Phase2Deport and call for 1 million deportations in 2026! As we say in our release: "This is not a difficult question: If you are in the United States illegally, you need to go home. If you won't leave, you must be deported. Justice demands it." Looking forward to helping save our country by combating the woke "Christian" lies that tell American Christians we cannot secure our border and remove illegal aliens. Of course we can.

@iemaksorn @Odoyle1201 @patrickmgleason @joelpollak This is literally the opposite of the truth.

@Odoyle1201 @patrickmgleason @joelpollak That’s why it was litigated and legally debated! You’re another dumbass! Even SCOTUS ruled unanimously! So IEEPA was passed by Congress!

It's striking that the Supreme Court, and Chief Justice John Roberts in particular, could rewrite Obamacare to define a penalty as a "tax," but could not find a way to accept otherwise legal tariffs that had simply been imposed under a different law than one of the many allowed.

@NGorhamA4S4 @OhioMike72 I defended it IN THE ORIGINAL COMMENT. It is asinine because something that is in the Constitution cannot by definition be unconstitutional. The defense is the 17th Amendment. I’d be happy to further teach you about the appointment of judges and justices if you need.

@RLAlitheia @OhioMike72 @RLAlitheia @OhioMike72 Specifically How Is It Asinine? Are you able to defend your statement or are you just going to run your mouth?

🚨Rep. Chip Roy: “Maybe it’s time to dump all 435 in the House, all 100 in the Senate, and start from scratch because Congress is literally failing the American people.” Thoughts?

@OhioMike72 Vote. Be vigilant. Be engaged. But the idea that the direct election of senators is unconstitutional is asinine, because it’s literally the 17th Amendment to the Constitution.

@RLAlitheia How can we prevent the destruction of our republic via the consolidation of power in the DC beltway?

@NGorhamA4S4 @DavidJHarrisJr That’s an awful lot of words to be so wrong.

@DavidJHarrisJr It’s the United States Senate, and the seating of ALL State And Federal Judiciary that’s the problem. Starting From Scratch Like You Suggest, WILL NOT FIX THAT PROBLEM. We are ruled by unconstitutional direct and indirect popular vote-seated state and federal judicial cartels that rule this nation via tyrannical state and federal judicial edicts. There is no rule of law or equal protection under the law when state and federal judiciary are seated unconstitutionally via direct and indirect popular vote from the most populous counties and cities in those counties in all 50 states, territories, and possessions. This is unconstitutional under Article IV, Section 4 of the United States Constitution (the Guarantee Clause), which states: “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.” There are supposed to be three voices represented in our federal government, hence the three branches: • The voice of the people, represented in state and federal Houses of Representatives. • The voice of the state, represented in state and federal Senates. • The voice of the law, the state and federal judiciary. The problem is that the voice of the people—which is already represented in state and federal Houses of Representatives via direct popular vote—now also seats the voice of the state and the law from the same voting pool: only the most populous counties and cities in those counties. That means only that voting pool has any representation in our state and federal government. This creates an unconstitutional democracy form of government, violating Article IV, Section 4, which requires the United States to guarantee a republican form of government to the states—not a mob-seated democracy. It is impossible to be a constitutional republic when state and federal judiciary are seated by direct or indirect popular vote only from the most populous counties and cities (i.e., the mob—the voice of the people), which also seats state and federal Houses of Representatives and Senates from that same pool of voters. There is no equal protection under the law in such an unconstitutional democratic form of state and federal government. The United States has failed to guarantee a republican form of government to the states since 1849, when Luther v. Borden set in motion the practice of states seating state judiciary via direct popular vote. What originally made the United States a constitutional republic was the guarantee of a republican form of government to the states, which required an independent state judiciary seated by the state Senate (the voice of the state as a whole) for state district courts and above, including state supreme courts. The voice of the people represents population centers and cities, which have the density to cancel out rural areas. When the voice of the state resided in the United States Senate—senators chosen in full and open sessions of state legislatures—and those senators seated an independent federal judiciary, that structure created the constitutional republic. That does not exist today. What exists is an anti-republican democratic form of state and federal government masquerading as a constitutional republic—which it is not.

@MFretired @guypbenson CJ Roberts bursts that balloon in a footnote, amigo.

@guypbenson Are you forgetting Congress delegated tariff authority to POTUS in more than one law?

SCOTUS got it right, in my view. Three points: 1) Justice Gorsuch’s exchange in oral arguments was so key to me. He asked if a future POTUS could use this precedent to unilaterally declare a “climate emergency” and impose policies he or she wanted as a result. The admin’s lawyer said probably yes. NO THANK YOU! 🚩 2) SCOTUS isn’t so much slapping down Trump as it is *once again* telling Congress to do its job. If we want to use tariffs this way (separate debate, I’m skeptical), we can pass laws constitutionally. Way too much reliance on the executive and judicial branches to do things they won’t/can’t do with the authority they actually have. 1) This ruling deals another blow to the Left’s cynical and dangerous delegitimization campaign against SCOTUS. They push destructive schemes like court packing because they are annoyed that they don’t get all the outcomes they want from the current Court. They lie and pretend this Court just prostrates itself in front of Trump and bends to his will. Not so, including on this big one.

@guypbenson I mean, three of them did prostrate themselves, including one (Thomas) saying that a president should have the ability to impose tariffs because it was an instrument kingly prerogative.

@NateSilver538 He has the personality of wallpaper paste.

Ossoff is slightly cringe but a better candidate along every dimension that matters than Gavin.

@Devlinside123 @mmcgowan1 @rgoodlaw No, that is not what officers are taught nor is it consistent with court decisions. Force must be commensurate to the threat and end when the imminent threat of death or grave bodily injury has ended.

@mmcgowan1 @rgoodlaw The number is irrelevant…legally, officers are taught to expend their ammo at the perceived threat…it’s not a shoot once…and check how things are going..

Bellingcat is gold standard "Video of the shooting appears to show that a gun was taken from the man BEFORE THE FIRST shot was fired." "At least 10 shots being heard in total. Most of them are fired after a brief delay, when the man is already lying motionless on the ground."

@benjaminppugh @justinamash @grok Hi, attorney here. The issue in Abel was the fruit of the search, not the judicial warrantless entry into the hotel room.

@justinamash Grok hasn’t read Abel v US, 362 U.S. 217 (1960). @Grok did Abel v US involve an administrative warrant permitting law enforcement entry into a residence?

A self-own in three acts:

@SBInc5 @TriciaOhio To be clear, that only is referring to border areas and not places like Minneapolis. But that’s irrelevant in this discussion which is controlled by general Fourth Amendment protection in the case of forced entry into private spaces.

@TriciaOhio 8 USC 1357 explicitly excludes homes, why does our government lie about absolutely everything?

@AugustCorreia @TriciaOhio I am a lawyer, whether I “want to be” or not. What part of Tricia’s citation authorizes warrantless entries into dwellings absent specific exigent circumstances? I’ll wait.

@TriciaOhio Thank you Tricia these want to be lawyers 😂😂😂

Hi! Attorney here! The Supreme Court directly rejected that incitement argument in Texas v. Johnson.

@Jordan17Johnson @chipgaines @JoelWBerry @MattWalshBlog Ah, yes… the American Christian family man who cusses in his proclamation of his primacy.

@chipgaines @JoelWBerry You just said you don't care that people watch your show because there's plenty of other shows to watch... you are a moron and like @MattWalshBlog said a Fraud worst of all. I am THE American Christian family man and this shit should not be tolerated!

Talk, ask qustns, listen.. maybe even learn. Too much to ask of modern American Christian culture. Judge 1st, understand later/never It’s a sad sunday when “non believers” have never been confronted with hate or vitriol until they are introduced to a modern American Christian💔

@NYCxVILLAIN @CiaoEllaBella @nocapmedia @Mets Corona is next to Flushing. Citi Field is not in Corona.

Hmmmm, it’s not in Corona, huh?? And why don’t you walk anywhere at night??? What demographics do you have to worry about the most?? And what is a woman anyway??? What did we learn here: 1. You don’t know where Corona is. 2. You call me a racist, but you’re afraid to walk around Queens at night, because (like you said) Queens is mostly filled with (illegal) immigrants.

Thoughts?