Rachel Weissman

@SammyJames77 @MillennialWoes Yeah, obviously, but again, they do it far less and far less severly than the modern left. Trying to be truthful is a conservative/Christian value. The corresponding progressive value is grabbing power at all costs, making lying not only necessary but "good".

@RachelWeissman9 @MillennialWoes Do you believe right wingers lie?

But IS woke a dying agenda? It's tired and everyone hates it, but everyone has always hated it. I think, if the Dems get in next time, this stuff will be dialled back up to 11.

@SammyJames77 Spiritually, sure, but this is a materialist argument, so no. But the government not intervening is NOT "using your birthplace against you". The government intervening IS using your birthplace against you.

@RachelWeissman9 Just trying to get to know you :) Do you believe where one is born is within their control?

Put a 100 marbles in a jar, 14 blue marbles to represent the population of the West, and 86 red marbles to represent everyone else. If you draw a marble, blindly and at random, from the jar, you have a 14% chance of drawing a blue marble. This how @justalexoki sees the moment of conception. He thinks he is a random generic soul, fresh from the Well of Random Generic Souls, drawing a marble from the jar. 14% blue, 86% red. But you don't draw the marble. You are the marble. A blue marble only has a 14% chance of being selection in a random draw. But, in or out of the jar, a blue marble has a 100% chance of being blue. This is the Seagull Test, which is an inversion of the Breakfast Test. The Breakfast Test requires you to describe a hypothetical timeline where you skipped breakfast this morning, to prove you can imagine hypotheticals. The Seagull Test requires you to reject the question "What if you were a seagull?" as a nonsense question, to prove that you understand the difference between valid and nonsense hypotheticals. You can skip breakfast and still be you, but there is no version of you that can be a seagull, and no seagull that can, in any meaningful way, be you. To pass the Seagull Test, you must reject the question and refuse to answer, or, better yet, reframe the question so that it asks for the intended information in a coherent way, i.e. "What does it feel like to be a seagull?" Which is a very, very different question. I can, with good observational data and some intelligent speculation, possibly understand the thoughts and feelings of a Pakistani brick layer. But I cannot be one in any coherently possible universe, because I am, by definition, me. A blue marble.

@petersteele Then go fight a pack of níggers "fairly" you rétard and argue about the finer points of self defense when you're lying in a hospital with severe brain damage because of the 27 stomps on your skull.

Im a little confused here. Typically getting punched, even if a sucker punch, isn't justification to switch over to lethal force. I have a CPL, and a fist fight is not grounds for use of lethal force like this unless you are some small woman or elderly person. Now had the attacker pulled a knife or gun, then yeah, 100% can justify shooting them. This will be interesting to see how it plays out in court.

Controversial streamer ChudTheBuilder reportedly shot a man and wounded his own arm outside a Tennessee courthouse, later telling police on stream that he was attacked and acted in self-defense.

@___F3ARL3SS___ You're arguing with a newsfeed, rétard. Also, if you think saying a word is a good enough justification for trying to take someone's life you're a danger to us all and you should be put down.

@Breaking911 Conveniently leave out the fighting words info duchebag. Tell the whole truth not what makes u look like a victim.

@Breaking911 Thank God he's alive.

@CodeGhost_ML You donated to Karmelo Anthony, so SHUT THE FUCK UP, shitstain.

@Tomhennessey69 @Breaking911 Y’all are sick

@TruthfulTreason Js win because people are dumb. That's all there is to it.

Watching the right eviscerate each other over the morality of the Chud the Builder situation, knowing full well that if he died every leftist would come together to celebrate as a whole.

@MichaelSimm_F As long as some people engage in self-destructive behavior poverty cannot be fixed, and as long as we are human beings controlled by our nature self-destructive behavior will always exist. A thoroughly tyrannical govt might try to ban human nature though. It has been tried.

@RachelWeissman9 That's up to the government unfortunately 🤷‍♂️

"I hope the secret police don't kick in my door tonight." "I hope there's some bread left when I get to the front of the line." "I hope the commissar doesn't rape my wife." "I hope this nagging chest cough doesn't require antibiotics that I don't have the vouchers for." "I hope I don't get accused of harboring bourgeois counterrevolutionary sentiments." "I hope there isn't another purge." "I hope I can save up enough to bribe the local Party bloc supervisor for a better job posting." "I hope no one decides to name me as a accomplice to stop the torture." "I hope the power stays on tonight." "I hope things will be better some day."

@SammyJames77 @MillennialWoes It's much rarer, much weaker and much different in its circumstances. The left often compares how both sides have handled Kirk's assassination VS. Floyd's overdose, showing that their moral compass is absolutely fucked, in the arse, without lube.

@RachelWeissman9 @MillennialWoes Do you believe that right-wing people don't celebrate innocent people dying?

@SammyJames77 @MillennialWoes No, they lie about WHY they hate him and they lie ABOUT him. Their dislike of him is of no interest or consequence to me. Them LYING is.

@RachelWeissman9 @MillennialWoes Do you believe that people who say they don't like Donald are lying about it?

@SammyJames77 In a sense, sure, and I can't wait for the lame gotcha moment. Even though at this point I'm starting to doubt you're capable of expressing an honest opinion, that would require a certain kind of courage progressives rarely have.

@RachelWeissman9 So you believe that factors you can't control shouldn't be used against you?

@SammyJames77 Nope, I don't believe molesting people based on where they were born because of YOU thinking they did or didn't deserve something is a good idea. It's an ever worse idea if the state tries to "compensate" for things outside of people's control.

@RachelWeissman9 So you don't believe anyone deserves any more than anyone else because "deserve" is a made up concept?

@SammyJames77 @MillennialWoes Why the fuck would one invent rétarded and hateful lies to smear someone when they could attack him based on something that's true? The modern left is a collection of mentally ill psychopaths who celebreate killing innocent people for disagreeing with them politically.

@SammyJames77 @MillennialWoes I'm not a toddler, I don't operate based purely on emotions or desires, and I care about TRUTH. The fuckin' TRUTH, for fuck's sake. I hate people who lie and I hate even more those who think lying is okay if it gets them closer to political power.

@SammyJames77 That's totally irrelevant to the topic. Anything determined by factors outside of your control should not be used as an argument for or against you. And to try to "rectify" these factors using the state or whatever is idiotic, harmful and inhuman.

@RachelWeissman9 Do you believe where people are born is irrelevant to their quality of life?

@SammyJames77 Anyways, it's silly to ask if anyone "deserves" being born somewhere. In a materialist sense people have no control over it. It is exactly like asking if you deserve the sky being blue, regardless if it affects your life or not. You have the same responsibility for both: none.

@SammyJames77 Ask a zebra if it deserves to be eaten by a lion. "Deserve" is an artificial human notion we've created and it's kind of iffy, it was never described or applied consistently. Everyone and every ideology/religion has different ideas about who deserves what and why.

@SammyJames77 @MillennialWoes That's what's usually called being able to think critically and for one's self, isn't it? Too bad it's so rare nowadays people can't even grasp the idea any more. "What, you ain't in one of the boxes we were given to exist inside by the media? That's impossible!"

@RachelWeissman9 @MillennialWoes So you're against Donald, but you're also against people who don't like Donald?

@dissidentwest Studio interference makes creating cult classics impossible. Art is murdered by committees.

It’s weird how cult classics kinda just stopped being a thing. We’ll likely never again see a Boondock Saints, Fight Club or Donnie Darko and that makes me sad.