RadicalRasmalai

7.1K posts

RadicalRasmalai banner
RadicalRasmalai

RadicalRasmalai

@RadicalRasmalai

You get to choose weather you live or merely pass by

Katılım Haziran 2023
377 Takip Edilen264 Takipçiler
mahamāya
mahamāya@ArcanaAsymptote·
you have the urge to own a business bcz it is one of the most intense spiritual awakenings one can go through. it is intense because it removes illusions quickly about control, identity and certainty..
mahamāya tweet mediamahamāya tweet media
English
3
0
17
435
RadicalRasmalai
RadicalRasmalai@RadicalRasmalai·
@_space_punk_ Like if you own something that's private property no? So if you have private property then trade has to happen cause everyone's needs change. Acc means according
English
1
0
0
9
ꜱᴘᴀᴄᴇ ᴘᴜɴᴋ
The most capitalist thing one can do is allow people to HAVE capital
Nic0le@nicole_clash

“Why would we let AI take our jobs and rely on the government?” What people don’t realize is, AI is GOING to take your jobs, most of them. It’s already starting. And unless the government is willing to SHOOT every single person that uses AI (unrealistic), most traditional jobs will be more efficiently done by an AI or an automation. It is incredibly naive to think that “bombing the data centers” will stop the progression. You can shut down all the major AI labs today and it would barely make a difference. I can go on and on about why yes, the AI and the robots are in fact coming for your jobs. If you knew what I knew, you would believe me. For the purpose of this argument, let’s just assume that I am right, that AI is going to take the majority of jobs. When people lose their jobs, most people are gonna be royally fucked. They have rent to pay, kids to take care of. Food, water, etc. We need the government to step in. The alternative is, people die. Or they resort to stealing, looting, etc. “But if the government pays everyone, that’s communism/ socialism!” Wrong. If the government shuts down the free market, and gave everyone food water and shelter, that would be communism. It is infinitely better for the government to give people cash than raw resources. It lets the average person have the purchasing power to shape the free market. Why is the distinction important? Because the beauty of capitalism is, it pushes innovation and surfaces the best products to consumers. It lets the average person be able to start their own business. For example, suddenly there are more artists in the world. More musicians. More game developers. The people having cash in their hands means that they can use it to support their favorite art, music, games. “I doubt the government is actually gonna pay people, they’re corrupt and evil.” Yes, the government is corrupt. But what you have to realize is, even the government has incentives. When AI increases the efficiency of every single company, there will be more taxes collected from the corporations (see below tweet). It is in the government’s best interest to reinvest that money back into the economy in the form of UBI/ UHI. Most people who are against what I’m saying, and what @elonmusk said, assumes that the choice is between “AI taking our jobs and we rely on the government.” vs “We keep our jobs.” That is not what the choice is though. The real question is, what should the government do to make this brutal transition period the least painful as possible? It gets very very nuanced, but it absolutely has to start with the government giving people cash. That is the only way. The alternative is a communist police state with people starving, dying, looting, and rioting. And absolutely no one, not even the government, wants that.

English
12
0
56
2.2K
RadicalRasmalai
RadicalRasmalai@RadicalRasmalai·
@_space_punk_ Oh you mean a no private property kinda reality? Is this plausible acc to you?
English
1
0
0
5
ꜱᴘᴀᴄᴇ ᴘᴜɴᴋ
@RadicalRasmalai Oh this is a fascinating karmic junction- both you and I see things as so apparently obvious and yet the observations appear to diverge I mean why would we trade at all?
English
1
0
1
21
RadicalRasmalai
RadicalRasmalai@RadicalRasmalai·
@_space_punk_ once again sorry if it came out like a non sequitur. I am simply asking without money/UBI how do people engage in trade
English
1
0
0
9
ꜱᴘᴀᴄᴇ ᴘᴜɴᴋ
@RadicalRasmalai What do you mean? This feels like a non sequitur and also im sure you understand how the concept of trade works so I feel like Im not understanding what youre actually trying to ask
English
1
0
1
14
RadicalRasmalai
RadicalRasmalai@RadicalRasmalai·
@_space_punk_ So we are getting somewhere. So money is abolished, what's UBI's format? It's still needs to be quantitative or is it qualitative? We don't measure it? It's a vibe thing? If we measure it, it's money again with a mask
English
1
0
0
6
ꜱᴘᴀᴄᴇ ᴘᴜɴᴋ
@RadicalRasmalai Humans are being paid. Currently only rich humans are being paid. I am proposing that everyone should get paid for their labor, not just those who are willing to coerce/extort/manipulate others for money
English
1
0
1
13
ꜱᴘᴀᴄᴇ ᴘᴜɴᴋ
@RadicalRasmalai Wait why would we stop people from getting money? Transaction is inherently extortion/coercion/manipulation. Im starting to think perhaps our karmas wrt this issue are too divergent for feuitful conversation because we seem to be talking past each other?
English
1
0
1
25
RadicalRasmalai
RadicalRasmalai@RadicalRasmalai·
@_space_punk_ Alright, so this is the system we have now. But we should stop some people getting the money. We must go be a part of all transactions, judge that they are extortion, coercion or manipulative and stop those. Sorry if it feels like im being a hard-ass, I'm trying to get it
English
1
0
0
15
ꜱᴘᴀᴄᴇ ᴘᴜɴᴋ
@RadicalRasmalai Thats basically the system we have now! What Ive been doing as a no-money person is doing the work i find inherently valuable and talking a lot about hoe everyone should get paid for their labor, not just those who are willing to extort, coerce, and manipulate others for money
English
1
0
0
29
RadicalRasmalai
RadicalRasmalai@RadicalRasmalai·
@_space_punk_ Okay, let's say that everyone deemed worthy is paid money. Except one person. What do they do? accept not being worthy? Who checks to see if they are now worthy?
English
1
0
0
11
RadicalRasmalai
RadicalRasmalai@RadicalRasmalai·
@_space_punk_ Making sure? how would you make sure? Say we stick with the current definition of Capital as cash. How are you defining those who are benefitting society as? Old people are benefitting society? No? Ok they vanish. They are? Who decides?
English
1
0
0
15
ꜱᴘᴀᴄᴇ ᴘᴜɴᴋ
@RadicalRasmalai The useful way forward is making sure those who are benefitting society are getting UBI and not just those who are defecting on the social contract, as we have now
English
1
0
1
37
RadicalRasmalai retweetledi
sigh swoon
sigh swoon@sighswoon·
Vision board I sent to my publisher for my book cover vs. the final design
sigh swoon tweet mediasigh swoon tweet media
English
196
865
43.6K
1.8M