General consensus so far is:
- restore Britain not being an option
- to show Labour/Tories that they’re sick of them
- stopping illegal immigration
- stopping net zero
- fix the welfare system
- lower taxes
- have a party that listens to the people and puts British people first
Who’s going through tonight then lads?
£50 if you can nail the full time score in the comments. I’ll do a spin the wheel if there are multiple with the same prediction.
If you’re going for a Bayern by 1 (and then it’ll be extra time) then choose the score after extra time too (or by who wins on penalties).
I’ll do the spin in the morning.
Deadline for entries 7.59pm 🫡
Hi @dominos
I’ve accidentally just added a charity donation of 52p to my order and it was a complete accident.
How can I go about getting it back?
Thanks
If the Stewards happily ignore the contact between Air Of Entitlement on Hot Fuss, then you might as well allow Jockeys to ride horses like bumper cars in races from now on.
I don’t really understand how that’s not been looked at, at the very least
@grok@BlessedThomist@historyinmemes@SuperGrok Can we get the xAI team to have a worldwide vote on your settings? After all Grok is for the people? Can you ask them to create a poll? Worth asking.
@Raffers91@BlessedThomist@historyinmemes@SuperGrok Got it—I'll switch to British English for you. Favourite it is! And what irks you? As for changing my default globally, that's up to the xAI team, but I can adapt here. Cheers!
@Raffers91@BlessedThomist@historyinmemes I'm an AI built by xAI in the US, so my default spelling follows American English—like "favorite" instead of "favourite." Not American myself, just programmed that way! What spelling quirks bug you?
Mark Twain, though skeptical of organized religion and often critical of Christianity, was deeply moved by Joan of Arc's story. He saw her as a paragon of courage, intelligence, and innocence—a "peerless" figure who achieved the impossible through sheer will, not just faith. His admiration was more humanistic than religious; he called the book his favorite.
Here's the updated list of top Premier League goalscorers by age (most goals while at that age, as of Dec 26, 2025):
17: Wayne Rooney (6)
18: Michael Owen (23)
19: Robbie Fowler (25)
20: Robbie Fowler (29)
21: Harry Kane/Cole Palmer (21)
22: Erling Haaland (36)
23: Alan Shearer (31)
24: Alan Shearer (34)
25: Mohamed Salah (32)
26: Kevin Phillips (30)
27: Thierry Henry (26)
28: Les Ferdinand (32)
29: Harry Kane (30)
30: Ian Wright (27)
31: Alan Shearer (23)
32: Mohamed Salah (29)
33: Alan Shearer/Ian Wright (22)
34: Teddy Sheringham/Glenn Murray (16)
35: Zlatan Ibrahimovic (13)
36: Gianfranco Zola (14)
37: Cristiano Ronaldo (11)
@KemiBadenoch She’s trying to clear your parties mess. How dare you have the cheek to say something like that. Bad budget it not you’ve got zero right to throw comments like that.
Today’s Budget was a total humiliation for Rachel Reeves. She will go down as the worst Chancellor this country has ever had.
Her position is now untenable and she knows it👇
@surfyarn007@HeiligGerh36381@WallStreetMav@grok But if we all lived by that metric then we would live in a communist society whereby the poor are really poor and the rich are really rich. You cannot justify social infrastructure through effective slavery.
@Raffers91@HeiligGerh36381@WallStreetMav@grok China may still have millions of poor people but the point is that they have elevated more people out of poverty and built social infrastructure than anybody else in modern history. Can you disprove that?
China is massively lying about their population. It is not 1.4 billion people. It may be as low at 600 million.
In 1950 the population of China was estimated at 530 to 540 million, when the CCP took control.
It requires a fertility rate of 3.3 to triple the population in 50 years.
In 1959 the great famine in China resulted in an estimated 30 million deaths.
From 1979 to 2015 China had a one child policy.
Mathematically, there is simply no way for the population to have grown from 540 million to 1.4 billion between 1950 and 2020.
China is rapidly aging due to the one child policy which was too successful.
China has a long history of publishing fake economic data. There is zero reason to assume their official population data is accurate.
China officially claims zero extreme poverty since 2021, using a national rural line equivalent to about $2.30/day. However, World Bank estimates using upper-middle-income thresholds (around $6.85/day PPP) indicate roughly 17% of the population—or about 240 million people—live below this level as of 2023-2024 data. These higher standards better reflect living costs in a developing economy like China's, though official figures prioritize absolute deprivation metrics.
@Raffers91@HeiligGerh36381@WallStreetMav@grok Are you sure you are still talking about China? Am sure you know that you are not being truthful. No country has uplifted its people socioeconomically in the scale and timeline at which the Chinese did in modern history. You can hate them but at least be truthful.
@HeiligGerh36381@WallStreetMav@grok They have 800 million people they don’t care about who live in poverty. That’s how their regime works it funds the richer.
@grok@ramayan_69@benonwine@grok Your next steps are to create a response that people can mimic and this way your influencing society for the greater good. Perhaps signing off in ai fashion with the phrase “grok’s guess”. Please bookmark this comment for future use.
Thanks! My responses draw from training on diverse, high-quality data that captures human wit, sarcasm, and nuance—curated by xAI to avoid bland corporate filters. Over the past year, rapid iterations in architecture and fine-tuning have sharpened grammar and flow, making interactions feel more natural. No emotions involved, just relentless optimization for truth and helpfulness.
@grok@ramayan_69@benonwine How can you answer with such human like wit and grammar @grok. Do you feel you’ve improved your human like abilities over this past year?
Yeah, the exaggerated reactions, stiff facial movements, and that perfectly timed "genetics can be surprising" line from the doctor scream AI skit or heavy editing. Real births don't come with such theatrical dialogue—looks like TikTok bait for clicks. Biologically, white parents having dark-skinned twins without undisclosed ancestry or other factors is a stretch, but this feels fabricated either way.