Surinder Raj Singh
14.2K posts


Palmer loses the ball, doesn't give a damn, doesn't track back to recover. And boom, England gets punished for it.
But as long as it's not Foden, you won't hear a word of criticism.
x.com/FranturaB/stat…
English

@LivingEntityX @sheikahmedameen @Harshann7 @Its_CineHub Major Iqbal just casually abseiling down from a container one handed from a chain hanging from a crane and then dislodges the chain loose with just a flick of the hand to use as a weapon. OK THEN 👍🏽🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
English

@LivingEntityX @sheikahmedameen @Harshann7 @Its_CineHub Lol! Sorry, but what was the difference between YRF final fights with villains and Jaskirat’s with Major Iqbal? It was equally or not more ridiculous than Pathaan’s final fight. A razor sharp weapon that can cut through legs just happened to be at a container yard? OK then 🤣🤣🤣
English

Seems like #Dhurandhar2 is losing steam as the trend looks slightly weaker than #Dhurandhar in its second week 🤯
And it might find it difficult to hit 2000cr gross worldwide, meaning it may not be able to break Aamir Khan’s #Dangal record. Still, it’s a wait and watch situation for now, but at this momentum, the film is likely to do around 1850–1900cr gross.
WAIT AND WATCH FOR NOW 🤞 @RanveerOfficial

English

@adi_yogi_1 @TheEconomist That is the biggest pile of horseshit I’ve read in a while. Your examples are puerile. And the Economist has been proven right by your comment because you truly believe a latently propaganda filled film like Dhurandhar can be compared to outright fantastical films like JamesBond.
English

By this logic, Top Gun: Maverick reflects a world Americans "browbeaten by years of Pentagon messaging" believe to be real. James Bond is 60 years of MI6 recruitment propaganda. Dunkirk is Churchill's ghost writing British exceptionalism into celluloid. Zero Dark Thirty literally had CIA officers on set.
But when those films release, The Economist writes about "the power of cinema to capture national memory." When India makes one, it's a symptom of mass delusion manufactured by a strongman.
Fifteen thousand Indian civilians killed in Pakistan-sponsored terrorism since 1970. A film dramatises it. The Economist's concern is not the terrorism. It's that Indians noticed.
Condescension this perfectly calibrated hasn't been seen since the last time someone in London explained to Indians what Indians actually think.
English

The genius of “Dhurandhar” is to reflect the world many Indians, browbeaten by years of shrill pro-Modi messaging on TV news and social media, already believe to be real economist.com/asia/2026/03/2…
English

@hinduparichay @dhume @claptrap171 @MehrTarar Ha!! Actually you’ll find that the people who have a problem with the word “Propaganda” are the ones who don’t know what it actually means, why it is dangerous when weaponised to influence and those who insist Dhurandhar isn’t a prime example of it.
English

@dhume @claptrap171 @MehrTarar "Propaganda" is the favorite word of morons who can't form an actual argument. Everyone's entitled to act like an idiot once in a while, but Dhume, you really abuse the privilege 😑
English

@choga_don Saale bewakoof log. India mein abhi bhi laakhon log sadak pe sothe hai or sadak pe hi tatti karte hain. Hazaron rape case har saal darj hothen hain. Bachche bheek maang rahe hai. Aur iss madar chhod ko films se complaint hai 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
हिन्दी

Deepa Mehta made a film called "Fire". It was basically based on two lesbians. What were their names? Sita and Radha.
Actually, that film is based on Ismat Chugtai's story "Lihaaf". What were those characters? Rabbu and Begum Jaan. They didn't show that; instead, they made them Radha and Sita.
There was a film by Aditya Chopra, "Chak De! India". In that, they showed Kabir. To make everyone feel guilty, he was shown as a traitor just because they lost a hockey match. That is based on the real-life Hindu character Mir Ranjan Negi.
He was the one everything happened to, but to evoke guilt and aggrandize, they chose Shah Rukh Khan.
English

@GitaShlokas_ Abbe behan chhod, saara din auratein agar yeh bakwaas karengi toh kaam pe tera baap jaayega? Saale teen ghante laga diye chunari mooh pe lagaane ke liye 🤣🤣🤣
हिन्दी

@dioncini @lostin_x @JOKAQARMY1 Tiger? 🤣🤣🤣 For one those “patriots” are just right wing fucknuts. Two: “Singh” means “Lion”. And three: any politician that requests people to sign up to die should be required to sign up themselves or one of their children/relatives first.
English

@Rajplayer @lostin_x @JOKAQARMY1 Doesn't matter, Don't want to fight don't sign up. You should be embarrassed using the name tiger, You're not a tiger. You're far separated from those Patriots in India.
Brooklyn, NY 🇺🇸 English

@dioncini @lostin_x @JOKAQARMY1 And of the 10% that do see action (aka get sent to die), how many of that number is made up of politicians and their sons and daughters?
English

@lostin_x @JOKAQARMY1 90% of the military doesn't see direct combat, it's called support. Anyone who joined the military expecting not to fight, shouldn't be there.
Brooklyn, NY 🇺🇸 English

@adamkeys_ @TFTerraceMedia Why? He’s the most decorated player in the history of the Premier League. Nobody is gonna win 13 Premier League Titles ever again.
English

@TFTerraceMedia Ryan Giggs being ahead of the nine below him is hilarious 😂
English

@GBUnitedx He couldn’t beat Spurs in a Final. He couldn’t beat Wolves. He can fuck off and so can gaslighting cultists like you.
English

Ruben Amorim had a dream to turn Manchester United into a powerhouse, but one could claim that the dream never came to light because he was surrounded mostly by those who didn’t believe in him.
The result wasn’t consistent, but what was, was the attacking fluidity. No team had more expected goals and goal threats than Manchester United, and the major reasons behind the inconsistency was the backline and midfield — both areas he was planning on improving.
Ever since he left (1-1 draw with Leeds), Manchester United haven’t recorded past 2.50 expected goals till date.
I was terrified of how United found it easy to penetrate every defense. We didn’t hear ‘we didn’t create chances because of low block’ under Amorim. That’s fact.
We all know since Solskjaer, low block teams were our undoing.
Amorim was going to fix the midfield in the next transfer market, but Omar and Wilcox decided to listen to the club legends like Paul Scholes, Gary Neville and Roy Keane, who are also not in support of Michael Carrick taking the permanent job.
WOW!

English

@AvidReaderClub @Peggysknapsack @TyrantOppressor Are you really such a moron? There is a huge difference between praying & bells chiming in a temple, bhajjan playing in a Gurdwara or a call to prayer on a loudspeaker outside of a mosque. This lady is none of the latter. And if you can’t see that, then this debate is pointless.
English

Some Muslim women were praying peacefully in an airport prayer room.
Then a Hindu leader entered the same space and started chanting loudly.
This doesn’t come across as religiosity at all, it feels more like a deliberate act meant to provoke and disturb.
What makes it even more concerning is that she recorded the entire incident and posted it herself, as if this behavior was something to be proud of.
So the question is, what exactly is the message behind this? What is she trying to prove or normalize by doing this ?
English

@AvidReaderClub @TyrantOppressor No, looks like you’re the retard who can’t tell the difference between a person praying and loudspeakers. Idiot.
English

@Rajplayer @TyrantOppressor Are you a retard? Do you really hear silent and peaceful prayers from these people when they blast speakers 5 times a day?
Looks like you forgot your religion or maybe you are a convert.
English

@AvidReaderClub @TyrantOppressor Why the hell is she chanting so loudly? Is she scared God can’t hear her? Most Christians, Muslims, Sikhs and Hindus I know pray under their breath. This isn’t praying. This is grandstanding. A prayer room isn’t a Church, Temple or Mosque.
English

@TyrantOppressor A prayer room is a multi-faith space, not a private one. If we advocate for the right to pray undisturbed, that right must apply to everyone, regardless of the language or volume of their devotion. We can't claim to value 'secularism' only when it suits one side.
English

@AnkurSaroha @MoInsiders Bakwaas bandh kar. Ab tu yeh bhi kahe ga ke Pep Guardiola kya cheez hai? Uske paas Messi, Iniesta or Busquets the. Sir Alex Ferguson kya tees maar Khan tha? Uske paas Rooney, Ronaldo aur Tevez the.
Indonesia

@MoInsiders Spoken the truth. Indian team was so Goated 2007-13 that we won T20 WC with no official Coach. We won 2013 CT with Duncan Fletcher. Do we give this much credit to Duncan Fletcher? Indian team indeed was such a packed unit that they didn't need a high profile coach.
English


@DrEliDavid If you’re too stupid to learn the rules of football, then don’t bother commenting. Modric was booked for time wasting and kicking the ball away (mandatory yellow). It had nothing to do with the altercation.
English

@theskindoctor13 Pitchfork (which has 4 prongs) representing a Trishul which literally means 3 Spears 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Fucking idiot.
English

🚨CADBURY DITCHES EASTER: NOW SELLING “GESTURE EGGS” 🤬🍫
Britain’s 1,400-Year Christian Heritage Erased to Pandering to Certain Communities Who Might Get Upset ✝️
For more than fourteen centuries Britain has been a Christian nation.
Through invasions, wars, the Black Death, Reformation, civil war, two world wars, and every kind of hardship, one thing remained constant: the joyful celebration of Easter.
Yet in 2026 Cadbury, a brand built on British chocolate and long associated with Easter, has quietly removed the word “Easter” from its chocolate eggs in outlet stores.
They are now labelled Gesture Eggs” with the vague corporate line: “From Cadbury this season.”
What season exactly?
It is Easter.
These are Easter eggs.
They are sold for the Easter season.
Cadbury is perfectly happy to pocket record profits from the single biggest chocolate sales period of the year, a period driven almost entirely by the Christian festival of Easter, but apparently too frightened (or too cynical) to utter the word itself.
This is not an innocent rebrand. It is deliberate pandering to certain communities who might get upset at the sight of a Christian holiday being acknowledged. Another small but telling sign of how mass migration and the relentless push for “inclusivity” at any cost is slowly erasing English and British identity.
The same company that once proudly printed “Happy Easter” now seems allergic to the word.
Meanwhile the product itself has been quietly degraded for years: lower cocoa content, more palm oil and vegetable fat, less milk, smaller bars, higher prices. Now even the cultural meaning and name of the occasion they exploit is being scrubbed.
So Cadbury gets the Easter windfall while pretending Easter doesn’t exist so nobody, especially not newcomers or activist pressure groups, might feel momentarily uncomfortable.
That is cultural cowardice dressed in corporate PR.
They are Easter eggs.
It is Easter.
Say it.
Shame on Cadbury.


English












