Joe Allen ✝️

Wow. So Tucker is just now blatantly lying about scripture and what it is says. He claims here that the book of Esther is about Persian genocide, rather than what it actually is about—which is how God protects the Israelites from genocide against THEM.

On another note: Tucker isn’t just ranting against Jews. He’s also going after Paula White, Franklin Graham, evangelicals, Mormons, and…whatever other faith leaders or communities he doesn’t like. Oh, but standing up for Islam against mockery. There’s that really bizarre part.

Desecrating Easter was the first step toward nuclear war. Christians need to understand where Trump is taking us. 0:00 Monologue 43:23 Paula White’s Strange Easter Sunday Service 51:17 Who Really Is Paula White? 57:24 How Did Paula Become Trump’s Spiritual Advisor? 1:00:03 The Exposed Megachurch Documents 1:09:52 Why Is Corruption So Prevalent in American Protestant Churches? 1:13:10 The Scam That’s Taken Over the Nonprofit Industry 1:27:14 The Mormon Church’s Investments in Weapons Manufacturing 1:28:52 How Much Money Does Franklin Graham’s Nonprofit Have? 1:33:11 How Do Megachurch Pastors Justify Owning Private Jets? 1:39:30 Graham's Bizarre Alaskan Hideout 1:52:42 The Love of Money Is the Root of All Evil 1:54:27 What Is Dispensationalism? 2:07:15 The Attempts to Usher in the Antichrist 2:13:00 Finding Contentment and Fulfillment in Christ 2:16:36 The Spiritual War Happening in the White House

🚨BREAKING: 20 Republicans and 20 Democrats just co-sponsored the Dignity Act — the first serious bipartisan immigration bill in decades. What it actually does: No amnesty. No citizenship. No handouts. A pathway to legal work status for long-term undocumented immigrants who meet strict requirements — fully funded by restitution payments from immigrants themselves, requiring zero taxpayer dollars. Mike Lawler’s own words: “This is not amnesty. It’s accountability, it’s fairness, it is dignity.”

70% of Irish people are Catholic, 76% are Christians. So why can't the the Irish President "elected for all" wish those Christians a Happy Easter?

TUCKER LIES ABOUT WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS. 👇 Tucker claims that Franklin Graham was “not teaching Christianity” because he talked about the Book of Esther, which Tucker claims is about the “genocide of 75,000 Persians.” He encourages you to read Esther, but he is hoping you won’t, because if you do, you’ll find that it’s the story of a failed attempt to genocide the Jews, and the only Persians who did were armed men who were actively trying to genocide Jews. Esther asked the king to revoke Haman’s genocide decree, but the king would not. He said, however, that Jews would be allow to defend themselves.👇 Esther 8: “So Esther arose and stood before the king, 5 and said, “If it pleases the king, and if I have found favor in his sight and the thing seems right to the king and I am pleasing in his eyes, let it be written to revoke the letters devised by Haman, the son of Hammedatha the Agagite, which he wrote to annihilate the Jews who are in all the king’s provinces. 6 “For how can I endure to see the evil that will come to my people? Or how can I endure to see the destruction of my countrymen?” 7 ¶ Then King Ahasuerus said to Queen Esther and Mordecai the Jew, “Indeed, I have given Esther the house of Haman, and they have hanged him on the gallows because he tried to lay his hand on the Jews. 8 “You yourselves write a decree concerning the Jews, as you please, in the king’s name, and seal it with the king’s signet ring; for whatever is written in the king’s name and sealed with the king’s signet ring no one can revoke.” 9 ¶ So the king’s scribes were called at that time, in the third month, which is the month of Sivan, on the twenty-third day; and it was written, according to all that Mordecai commanded, to the Jews, the satraps, the governors, and the princes of the provinces from India to Ethiopia, one hundred and twenty-seven provinces in all, to every province in its own script, to every people in their own language, and to the Jews in their own script and language. 10 And he wrote in the name of King Ahasuerus, sealed it with the king’s signet ring, and sent letters by couriers on horseback, riding on royal horses bred from swift steeds. 11 ¶ By these letters the king permitted the Jews who were in every city to gather together and protect their lives—to destroy, kill, and annihilate all the forces of any people or province that would assault them, both little children and women, and to plunder their possessions.”

Three former soldiers will appear at Belfast magistrates court on April 20th. One is charged with a killing that took place in May 1972. He is not accused of acting outside his orders. He is accused of acting within them. The distinction no longer appears to matter. This is the reality behind Labour's Northern Ireland Troubles Bill, a piece of legislation dressed in the language of reconciliation that functions, in practice, as an engine of persecution. The state that sent these men to Northern Ireland, that gave them their orders, that relied on their judgment in circumstances no minister has ever faced, is now the state that funds the machinery pursuing them through the courts half a century later. That is not a technicality. It is the central fact. Taxpayer money flows to the lawyers challenging the actions of soldiers whose actions were sanctioned by the taxpayer. The government calls this justice. General Sir Peter Wall, who commanded the British Army for four years, calls it something without moral backbone. He is right. The operational consequences are already visible. Elite soldiers are leaving the SAS and SBS rather than face the prospect of prosecution decades hence for missions carried out under government orders. The crisis has become sufficiently acute that reservists are being brought into the regular SAS to fill roles vacated by those walking out. Britain's most capable fighting force is being quietly hollowed out by a bill whose architects appear indifferent to the result. Seven former SAS commanders have warned that the legislation is doing the enemy's work, that operational secrets exposed through inquiries give hostile states a narrative of lawless troops. Moscow, Tehran and Beijing do not need to discredit British special forces. Westminster is doing it for them. The asymmetry at the heart of this legislation is not incidental. It is structural. IRA members were released under the Good Friday Agreement. Many destroyed evidence, stayed silent, or received letters guaranteeing they would not be pursued. Soldiers kept records, gave statements, and remained traceable. Decades later, only one group remains available for scrutiny. Not because they are more culpable, but because they are more reachable. The Coagh ambush of June 1991 illustrates the logic perfectly. Three IRA men were stopped by the SAS on their way to murder someone. A coroner ruled the force used was justified. Years later a family challenged that ruling, arguing the soldier should have paused after each shot to consider whether to fire the next one. A judge described that argument as ludicrous and utterly divorced from reality. The challenge continues, funded by legal aid, heard at the Court of Appeal just days ago. No verdict ends the process. The process is the punishment. Keir Starmer has said publicly he is absolutely confident there will be no vexatious prosecutions. Three soldiers will be in a Belfast court in sixteen days. His confidence has not reached them. The government insists its bill provides robust protections for veterans. General Sir Nick Parker, who oversaw the final operations in Northern Ireland, says ministers do not understand the duty of the state to stand by those who serve it. The duty to stand by those who serve is contractual, not sentimental. A soldier who follows orders in a war the state authorised cannot later be offered up as payment for political convenience. What is being constructed here is not a legacy process. It is a permanent legal industry, sustained by public money, targeting the most traceable participants in a conflict the state itself waged. The soldiers kept their records. That is now their liability. A serious country does not behave this way. This one, apparently, does. "Keir Starmer has said publicly he is absolutely confident there will be no vexatious prosecutions. Three soldiers will be in a Belfast court in sixteen days. His confidence has not reached them."

Rich Baris says Trump should not pick Lee Zeldin for Attorney General. Not because he isn't qualified. Because he's jewish.

I’ll take mean tweets, America First, and brutal honesty all day long! 🇺🇸