RocketMagician
13.2K posts

RocketMagician
@RaptorPrinter
Me? I‘m here for the rocket science and the marshmallows. ex-SpaceX
Los Angeles, CA Katılım Ekim 2011
1K Takip Edilen849 Takipçiler
RocketMagician retweetledi

Cool video of New Glenn’s fairing re-entry. For this flight we installed an exo-atmospheric reaction control system (RCS) in the fairing to control re-entry and enable recovery of the fairing. We’re planning a parachute recovery later this year, and the data from these fairings gives us the learnings needed to develop and refine that capability.
English

@Hoang_HQ Too bad the great video is wasted on such terrible music. That’s among the worst singing in a song ever. Like, I can’t imagine being in a booth and giving that performance and being like yup that’s the one right there. 🔥
English

I like how they have to say ‘on the planet’ after @SpaceX launched a Tesla into deep space.
Ford Racing@FordRacing
It's official: The Ford Racing Mustang Cobra Jet 2200 has clocked a new record time of 6.87 at 221 mph - now the quickest electric car on the planet. #FordRacing
English

Thanks to the incredible grit and determination of the SpaceX Starship team, our space future is soooooo close!
SpaceX@SpaceX
Three years since the first flight of Starship, the next generation is here. New ship. New booster. New engines. New pad and new test site. SpaceX engineers are working to solve one of the most difficult engineering challenges in history: developing a fully, rapidly reusable rocket
English

These are the vehicles getting the FSD v14.3.2 update
Tesla Models with HW4 / AI4:
--Model S (refreshed Plaid & Long Range) — Since early 2023.
--Model X (refreshed Plaid & Long Range) — Since early 2023.
--Model 3 (Highland refresh, 2024+) — All new Highland Model 3s.
--Model Y (including Juniper refresh) — Since mid/late 2023 (Fremont/Austin); all 2024+ and 2026 Juniper
--Cybertruck — All models since launch (late 2023/2024).
English

I don’t use AI to write FFS 🙄 man, such a lazy retort.
I have the transcript so it’s easy to find timestamps for things I want to review on the video with context and body language.
I’ll stick with people that knew her best, and not the conspiracists who let her carry on and led her to her demise.
English

The UFO community has a new martyr. Amy Eskridge.
Brave scientist. Murdered by aerospace contractors. Silenced before she could reveal the truth about antigravity propulsion. The eleventh dead scientist. A hero.
Except.
Has anyone actually read her texts? Watched her videos? Because I have. And what they reveal isn’t a silenced genius. It’s a deeply mentally ill woman in a catastrophic paranoid break - and a community that did absolutely nothing to help her.
Let’s start with the “science.”
Amy claimed she had cracked the antigravity puzzle that Bob Lazar - her words - got “100% backwards.” Except Amy had no physics training. None. A biology and chemistry background, no published physics research, no credentials in exotic propulsion. What she had was her father’s NASA name, a shell company called the Institute for Exotic Science, and credulous UFO believers ready to hand over money.
It gets wilder.
Amy didn’t just believe in antigravity. She believed in ultraterrestrials. Beings from our future - P47s and P52s - humans from forty-seven thousand and fifty-two thousand years from now, coming back to intervene in our timeline. Looking Glass doctrine. Converging timelines. Apocalyptic calamity scenarios. QAnon-adjacent mythology dressed up in pseudo-scientific language.
This wasn’t a physicist. This was someone whose conspiratorial belief system had completely consumed her reality.
Now let’s talk about those final weeks.
In May 2022, two weeks before her death, Amy’s Signal messages paint a picture of complete psychological freefall:
She cracked the “true” role of Element 115 in alien craft propulsion - left herself a voice memo about it while driving. That memo got surveilled. She was now on a kill list.
Private aerospace contractors had deployed directed energy weapons against her. RF k-band emitters run off car batteries in parked SUVs. Shooting microwave beams through her windows. She had radiation burns on her hands, her window blinds had been vaporized, and an X-ray image of her head was burned into the window pane.
Her supposed ex-CIA weapons guy and supposed retired STRATCOM general both confirmed it. Private contractors. Hired to harass her to death because her IP threatened billion-dollar defense contracts.
Israel was also involved - her dental records listed her employer as a technology center in Haifa. Mossad had socially engineered her dental insurance. Obviously.
Anonymous messages arrived at night. Creepy nursery rhymes coaching her to kill herself. Instructions to walk out to the barn in the dark. Psychological warfare to drive her to suicide before she could submit her next proposal to DARPA and NASA.
She told everyone around her obsessively: “I did not kill myself. I did not shoot myself. I did not overdose. I did not drive off a cliff.” So many times she believed it made her untouchable.
On June 11, 2022, she died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head.
Her father says there is nothing suspicious about her death. The police ruled “no foul play.”
This woman was in crisis. Visible. Documented. Textbook. And every person in her circle - her “ex-CIA weapons guy,” her “retired general,” her fellow UFO researchers - validated every delusion instead of getting her help. Nobody said “Amy, this isn’t real.” Nobody intervened.
Four years later that same community is holding her up as a martyr. The eleventh dead scientist. Proof of a cover-up.
They didn’t protect her when she was alive. They’re exploiting her now that she’s dead.
That’s the real story of Amy Eskridge. Not a silenced genius. A woman failed completely by the community that’s now profiting off her memory. Bizarre.

English

@alexboge That’s the limits of transcripts, they preserve content, but not delivery. It’s not always what was said but how. I called you out for ai because feeding it transcripts gets your response.…and as they say, just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they aren’t out to get you🔫
English

That’s incorrect, and I have a copy of the transcript. I didn’t have my mind made up. The clips are revealing as well, but it’s far better to watch the whole thing to see just how deep it runs. This is a textbook presentation of paranoid ideation: surveillance by handlers, romantic relationships reframed as covert operations, neighbors as agents, famous people secretly connected to her life, etc. The pattern is clinically recognizable. I didn’t make the diagnosis before writing my piece myself; I asked an expert to run through the video with me. She was going to do a piece on it, but now she feels it’s in poor taste (her call, not mine). She helped me craft a few parts of my two papers to get the language right (I’m a physicist, not a psychiatrist).
I asked you initially to link a video in case you had something I hadn’t watched already.
And yes, she relays that it’s Hal who told her about extraterrestrials, but I find it’s clear she believes it.
Look, thanks for the link. Have a nice night/day.
English

@johnkrausphotos @BLKMDL3 @Tesla_AI Preference I guess? as in I prefer to not park inside the mobile home park behind my workplace and would much rather park in my workplace’s actual parking lot. Lol
English

@alexboge As to the p52s, again, had you watched it you’d have the context that she was just relaying the theories Hal puttof told her at her dinner table one night.
English

I watched it a long time ago. Mentioning P52s is not helping your case. She has a background unrelated to physics or anything she talks about. She basically runs the same script we all hear.
I don’t use an AI to write anything. I have done my research using genuine source materials, not X posts from other conspiracy addicts and UFO believers.
If you watched that whole video and came away thinking she was rational or intelligent and not delusional, there is literally nothing further to discuss.
English


















