Rapunks

Stable/Tether chain looks to be the next undervalued gem playground. Already aped $FEFER and 1$ and expecting both to run. @paoloardoino quoted a tether tweet with Fefer as a mascot and it seems people are yet to bridge to the chain. Well, i already bridged usdc on base for Usdt0 (gusdt) using (relay.link/bridge), s/o to @suganarium and already swapped using @DYORSWAPDEX. Don't wait for the normies and SM to come in heavy before you make your bids Either Valhalla or zero from here Let's see if this is the next $CASHCAT play. Feels early 1 Fefer = 1 Tether Let's Go For charting, see this by my quant @Prateek0x_, 👇 fefercoin.netlify.app

Business cat knows #Bitcoin

Cashcat of @tether $BusinessCat mentioned multiple times by @paoloardoino 0x4f9E4Cae30a5e9FEeDbC65E56131875dE60d94b9

Our thesis on @ponsdotfamily and why we decided to build a strategy machine to accumulate $PONS. $PONS is the most undervalued cashflow in crypto Every cycle, the highest-margin business in crypto is the same one: the launchpad. Not the L1, not the DEX, not the lending market - the machine that mints the tokens. pumpfun proved it at industrial scale, printing ~$74M in fees and ~$28M in revenue in a single 30-day window, and the market rewards it with a $1.95B FDV. That's the template. Now lets look at what's being ignored on Robinhood Chain. The numbers nobody has repriced yet pumpfun, annualized off its current run-rate: ~$900M fees • ~$344M revenue FDV $1.95B → 2.2x fees, 5.7x revenue $PONS, five days into existence: 24h fees $496K, first-5-days $2.15M → ~$157M annualized 24h revenue $134K, first-5-days $419K → ~$31M annualized FDV $30.8M → 0.2x fees, ~1.0x revenue Same business. Same value-capture design. ~11x cheaper on fees. ~6x cheaper on revenue. And this isn't a dying franchise priced for decline - it's a protocol that in its first days has already done $404M in cumulative volume, 66,100 launches, 5.3M trades, and 27,600 unique developers, paying $4.12M to creators. That is pumpfun's early curve, compressed into a week. To simply match pumpfun's revenue multiple - not beat it, match it - $PONS re-rates from $30.8M to ~$175M. Roughly 5.7x on today's run-rate, before a single day of growth. On a fees basis the gap is wider still. Why the multiple should be higher, not lower Markets consistently misprice one thing: assets that quietly convert real revenue into token value. That is exactly what $PONS does — the overwhelming majority of protocol revenue is routed straight into $PONS buybacks. At the current run-rate that's roughly $24M/year of structural buy pressure against a $30.8M FDV. If it holds, that is a value-capture ratio in a different league from a launchpad token that just sits there. Then there's the part pumpfun can never retrofit: 100% community owned. No VC tranche, no team allocation, no cliff unlocks waiting to hit the bid. pumpfun's token carried insider overhang from day one. $PONS has a clean cap table — and in a category defined by who dumps on whom, that is the entire game. Robinhood Chain distribution. pump.fun had to manufacture its audience. $PONS is the dominant launchpad on a chain plugged into mainstream, retail-native distribution. Own the liquidity layer, let distribution come to you. A founder building in the open. @meadgod is shipping the Pons ecosystem publicly - ponsfamily.com, @ponsdotfamily - with the token, the analytics, and the buyback flows all verifiable onchain rather than promised in a deck. The market is doing to $PONS what it always does early: pricing a compounding cashflow machine as a toy, one week of data at a time, while the revenue stacks up underneath. Why $PONSTR exists — and why it matters If $PONS is the undervalued cashflow, $PONSTR is the leveraged, dividend-bearing vehicle built to compound it. The name is literal. It is to $PONS what MicroStrategy is to Bitcoin: a machine whose only job is to accumulate the underlying and hand the upside to holders. The mechanics are fixed in code, not vibes: Every $PONSTR trade pays fees. 90% of those fees market-buy $PONS. That $PONS is dropped to $PONSTR holders as recurring dividends, roughly once a day. Every $PONSTR token collected as a fee is burned in full - deflationary forever. No team allocation. No withdraw function in the contract. The rules live onchain and the treasury cannot be rugged. Why this matters beyond $PONSTR holders: it manufactures structural, non-speculative, perpetual buy pressure for $PONS. Every trade on the vehicle accumulates the asset. As $PONS appreciates, the treasury — denominated in $PONS — appreciates, the dividends grow, demand for the vehicle grows, and it buys more $PONS. A flywheel bolted onto a flywheel. If you believe $PONS is mispriced, $PONSTR is the compounding expression of that view: an index on the cashflow that also pays you to hold it. The first $PONS drop is landing soon. CA : 0x4A76d884Bb9CBbf2138fBe47e99584eB5168DdE2

这日赚500u--1000u的方法原来并没有被大众熟知； 这套玩法其实很早就有人稳定执行且稳定盈利； 那么咱就一起试试看会不会有结果，明天开始就在电报频道每天选五个标； telegram.me/B52Hzeth

Big thanks to @virtuals_io and the team, especially @DonJohnsonSays and @umeirzz for featuring our project $VENA during today’s Virtuals Jam Session app.virtuals.io/virtuals/95873 Here are the highlights about Vena: 👇