Sabitlenmiş Tweet
✨Rapunzel ASMR & Fixy ✨👑
49.3K posts

✨Rapunzel ASMR & Fixy ✨👑
@RapunzelASMR
Asmr youtuber , Wife, Mom 🕊️#❤️Jesus #VeganⓋ #asmrtist #CEO
Belgium Katılım Ocak 2009
386 Takip Edilen11K Takipçiler

@ToffeeDaz76 @itsdavidramms Just tell me you dont care about facts and truth. It literally answers your questions. Does it more thorough than I could.
English

@RapunzelASMR @itsdavidramms I haven't read any of this computer generated shite ... All your are proving is you have no intellect to deal with the questions. If you can't think for yourself...stay off the internet
English

We eat animals because we always have. Not because we need to, not because there's no alternative. Because it's what we grew up with, it's what everyone around us does, and changing feels uncomfortable. That's it. Billions of animals a year, for our comfort and habit. If that's not worth questioning, what is?
English

This is his attempted counter to your vegan argument: He’s using brumbies as proof that if we “let domesticated animals go” (like horses did historically), they become feral, overpopulate, wreck ecosystems, and require heavy human control (culling). He’s implying the same would happen with cows/pigs if we stopped eating them and “let them go.”
But here’s why it doesn’t hold up as a rebuttal:
• Brumbies are feral descendants of escaped/released domestic horses — yes, from centuries ago (since European settlement). Their national estimate is outdated (~400,000 from a 2011 survey; more recent focused surveys show much lower in key areas like Kosciuszko National Park, where aggressive culling has dropped numbers from ~17,000+ in recent years to around 3,000 or less by early 2026 targets). Australia actively manages them as invasive pests with aerial shooting, ground culling, etc., to prevent worse damage. They’re not “left unchecked” — humans intervene massively.
• This supports the vegan point, not his: When populations of escaped domesticated animals get too high and cause harm, societies control them lethally (same as feral pigs, deer, etc.). But in a vegan transition:
• We wouldn’t “release” billions of current farmed cows/pigs into the wild en masse.
• We’d stop artificially breeding tens of billions more each year via factory methods.
• Populations would decline naturally (no new forced generations), with existing ones rehomed to sanctuaries or living out lives without replacement.
• Feral pigs (from escapes) already exist and are managed aggressively (Australia has millions, culled heavily yearly — needs 50-70% removal annually to stabilize due to fast breeding). Feral cattle? Extremely rare and small-scale globally; cows don’t thrive/breed explosively in wild conditions like pigs or horses (slow reproduction, less adaptable).
His “facts” are cherry-picked and outdated on numbers (e.g., the 400k figure is from over a decade ago; current park-specific culls show sharp reductions via intervention). He’s still avoiding your core explanation: Farmed animal overpopulation is human-engineered via artificial insemination/selective breeding tied to demand. End demand → end the artificial pump → no explosion.
English

@RapunzelASMR @itsdavidramms Try not using Artificial intelligence...and use your own intelligence... So here's some facts ....I stead of Ai just making shit up

English

@ToffeeDaz76 @itsdavidramms No you completely didn’t get it.
English

@RapunzelASMR @itsdavidramms So your Ai also thinks animals will just stop breeding ... Absolute crap
English

he’s convinced that if we stop eating cows and pigs (and presumably other farmed animals), we’d just release billions into the wild, where they’d breed uncontrollably like some invasive species, leading to massive overpopulation chaos in 10 years.
But that’s a complete misunderstanding of how farmed animal populations actually work and what “going vegan” means in practice. Here’s the clear breakdown:
Farmed animals like cows, pigs, and chickens don’t exist in those numbers naturally. We humans artificially create them at industrial scale through:
• Forced artificial insemination
• Selective breeding for fast growth/high output
• Controlled environments to maximize reproduction (e.g., sows kept in crates to produce 2+ litters/year)
Right now, the global system breeds ~70–80 billion land animals every year just to slaughter most before adulthood. That’s not “natural” breeding—it’s a production line tied to demand for meat/dairy/eggs.
If society shifts vegan (gradually, as it would be—no overnight global switch):
• Demand drops → farmers breed fewer new animals (supply follows demand; no economic incentive to keep pumping out babies).
• Existing animals live out their lives (sanctuaries, rescues, or phased retirement).
• No massive “release into the wild” event—breeding slows/stops first, so populations decline through natural deaths over years/decades.
• Result: Dramatically fewer farmed animals overall, not more. Many breeds might dwindle or go extinct without human intervention (which vegans see as ending suffering, not a bad thing).
Now, about feral pigs/cows specifically (since he keeps pivoting to wild/feral examples like Australian kangaroos or brumbies):
• Feral pigs (escaped domestic pigs or their descendants) do exist and cause problems in places like the US, Australia, and Europe. They’re invasive, root up land, and populations are managed aggressively with trapping, hunting, aerial culling, and even experimental contraceptives. To stabilize or reduce numbers, 40–70% removal per year is often needed because they reproduce fast (large litters, multiple per year). But these are existing feral populations from past escapes/releases—not what happens if we stop factory farming tomorrow.
• Feral cows/cattle are rare and small-scale. Examples include isolated groups on public lands (e.g., some US forests from abandoned ranches) or stray cattle in places like India. They don’t explode into billions because:
• Cows reproduce slowly (one calf/year, long gestation).
• They’re not as adaptable or hardy in truly wild conditions without human support.
• Any overabundant groups get culled/removed when they damage ecosystems (same as brumbies or kangaroos—he’s using examples where humans already control numbers via lethal means).
Pigs can go feral and thrive in some environments because they’re closer to their wild boar ancestors genetically and behaviorally (they can revert quickly: coarser hair, tusks, aggression in weeks/months). Cows? Not so much—they’re heavily modified for docility and milk/meat production, and feral herds stay small or get managed.
The key difference: Veganism doesn’t propose “releasing” billions of current farmed animals into the wild unchecked. It proposes stopping the artificial creation of billions more in the first place. No breeding factories = no overpopulation bomb.
His Australian examples actually backfire on him—when populations (native or feral) get too high and cause damage, societies intervene with culling/hunting/quotas. But for farmed species, we’d prevent the artificial inflation entirely.
In short: No, we wouldn’t have roaming herds of trillions of cows and pigs overrunning everything. We’d have far less suffering and environmental destruction from livestock, with land freed for rewilding. His “what if we let them all go” is a strawman—he’s ignoring the gradual, demand-driven phase-out.
English

@RapunzelASMR @itsdavidramms If Ai is so great and always correct, can you get it to explain the massive numbers of wild horses and kangaroo in Australia? And how they deal with these massive groups of animals? That are left to do what they want
English

@ToffeeDaz76 @itsdavidramms Its like you ignored my entire post…
English

@RapunzelASMR @itsdavidramms Animals do not stop breeding ... They are programmed to do 2 things .... Eat and reproduce .... Even Ai can talk shite
English

@KeruboSk Idk i always just woke up and jump straight out of bed looking forward to the day and breakfast
English

@hyenosaurus @itsdavidramms Thats also what cannibals say
English

Ill let Grok reply as I have no time to type much atm: The key point here is that farmed animals like cows, pigs, chickens, etc., don’t breed and overpopulate naturally in the wild like deer or rabbits might. We humans force them into existence through artificial insemination, selective breeding, and massive industrial-scale reproduction specifically to kill and eat them.
If demand for meat, dairy, and eggs drops (as more people go vegan), farmers simply stop breeding so many new animals. Supply follows demand — fewer babies are born into the system each year. No sudden “let them all go” explosion happens overnight because the transition is gradual.
Right now, we’re artificially creating billions of animals every year just to slaughter them young (most “meat” animals never even reach adulthood). Stopping that breeding cycle means far fewer animals exist in total — which is actually a mercy, since it prevents suffering.
In a world with declining animal agriculture:
• Existing animals live out their lives (many in sanctuaries if needed).
• Breeding slows/stops → population naturally declines through attrition (no new generations forced into factory farms).
• No “control” needed because we’re not pumping out 70–100+ billion land animals a year anymore.
• Land currently used for grazing/feed (vast amounts) gets freed up for rewilding, growing plants for humans, or other uses — helping ecosystems recover instead of being wrecked by livestock.
The real overpopulation crisis is the one we’re causing right now by breeding trillions of animals into miserable lives. Going vegan helps end that cycle, not create a new one.
So, in 10 years? We’d have dramatically fewer farmed animals suffering, not herds running wild. Nature (and reduced human intervention) would handle the rest. 🌱
What do you actually think happens when people stop demanding the product? The factory just keeps churning out babies for no reason? Nah.
English

@itsdavidramms If we stop eating animals and let them all go ... How will we control the numbers in 10 years ? Go ....
English

@RapunzelASMR This is something that must be off my radar.
English

@nightly_nn Sadly yes… and it mostly enriches the top manosphere bros
English

@RapunzelASMR It must have been easy to prey on men without a proper role model.. 🤔
English

@RapunzelASMR That's called a long cloud. There's also short clouds, big clouds, and little clouds!
English

@RapunzelASMR It's flying very low, so I'd say it's a "lazy" cloud.
English

@DamnGroundhog Im literally also not surprised about anything anymore
English

@RapunzelASMR I have no idea, but this appeared on my timeline shortly after seeing your post:
In all seriousness, I know two things:
1) I have no idea what to believe these days.
2) Absolutely nothing would surprise me.

English

@RapunzelASMR @greendragonhq @elonmusk @grok So you are arguing for a child ra*ist. Who cares about all the statistics? He should be put to death for this.
English

@LeadersJunction Everyone should develop that way of thinking imo. I always found it strange ppl dont do this always. But I think it can be trained.
English










