Raven_Rainn_Model_8 ❣

🎶 Don't tell no lies about me and I won't tell truths about you 🎶 good bar!!!

I love learning that apparently I live on discord (not used it in forever) talking to some imaginary guy, who I imaginary lie to whilst being miserable and unhappy with life and all whilst someone is living their best life. I don’t have time to read books nor want to read streams of unhinged consciousness. I’ll just say it doesn’t make you look good. I know for some reason you think you look good and hahaha got me , but you didn’t. You just proved that the internet is everything to you , online is your world and I don’t live there. Talking about my relative passing away in the way you did , shows exactly who you are. Don’t threaten my family again though, that’s not ok. I’ve taken a lot of shit from your sperging sessions but threatening my family won’t be something I take. Now please forget I ever existed and touch grass and leave me alone.

Ohhh , how people mistake my being gracious and having some decorum about me for weakness. Imagine waiting until I’m not on to sub /sneak post about me and call me names. The thing is you can call me all the names but people are pretty good at judging character and I can’t help it that I’m naturally just funnier and get on with people easier. Now add to that having to beg said person to leave you alone because a family member is passing away (yet they don’t) quite sick really ( in this made up scenario) the person would need to be quite unhinged.

@KAPtain_KAParoo @theDoctorTil @ant0nGG Add to that , self importance, it was changed to impotence but that fits too and irl harassing females because they won’t do what he wants. 👀

@theDoctorTil @ant0nGG Flagging, doxxing, threats, mood swings… there’s a reason he falls out with everyone.

are you aware that your top guy is openly flagging all the content online that makes him upset? @theDoctorTil x.com/i/status/20337…

@KyleStalking @pierre_max19919 Same and not sure I’ve ever said anything to him. If so maybe a thing once about him in a thread but I’m not sure I even did that. Pathetic.

@pierre_max19919 He tried to make out with nick at Spiderman!!!

After outing Kyle Coleman’s lust for penis, closeted homosexuals across X have started blocking me!!!

@KyleStalking @benzo_samurai @CogCity True.

@benzo_samurai @CogCity Cog fumbled it. Many such cases!!!

ANDY WARSKI'S 15 YEAR OLD VICTIM (NOW 22) HAS BEEN FOUND! KINO CASINO ON HIATUS! PREPARE YOURSELF FOR TODAY'S SHOW!

@esoarchivist @KyleStalking By being Cog. I don’t think a single soul had a hope 😂

How tf do you fumble this?

@BalldoMania @castiron1185 @kylerlives @KillKinoKasino Can you imagine Cog. Why did you think it was ok to be 15… if she sees this and I hope she does and wants to talk just don’t talk to Cog. I know what happens first hand.

@castiron1185 @kylerlives @KillKinoKasino Yeah he and Mr K need to snatch that story from cog is what I was saying, not saying kyler shouldn't be involved

I guess Warski can rest easy because cog will completely fuck it up and nobody will see it anyway

@benonwine I saw them live. I laughed so hard. I didn’t know how they’d do the different sketches so fast but was amazing and today it wouldn’t even be allowed on the TV. ‘Something about curry’

Little Britain was definitely ahead of their time.

Nothing humbles you faster than realizing someone’s entire personality is ‘the world is plotting against me and also I’m the main character.’ Like damn… must be exhausting carrying that much main-character syndrome in one body.

Thank you for noticing 💓 It really does drive me insane that the English language gets decimated by all of the English’streamers’ and posters. The double negatives , not understanding past or present tense and the lack of grammar and punctuation , drives English people who know how to write and speak properly insane. It’s incredibly grating. I apologise on behalf of those of us who speak properly. It’s not exactly the odd typo , which can happen to the best of us.

@gastrooper Aside from the lovely and elegant @RavenRainnModel they’re all low iq.

BREAKING HUJAN NEWS: Kyle Coleman’s brother is ALSO A PEDOPHILE according to Kyle’s ex-wife he beat into a miscarriage.

Bystanders and Context: The court also addressed potential impact on others. While a group of young people was present, there was no evidence they were alarmed or distressed— in fact, the judge noted it was “quite impossible to infer” that they would be, given the commonplace nature of the words. If more inflammatory language (e.g., racial slurs) or a vulnerable audience (e.g., children or elderly people) had been involved, the outcome might differ. 10 5 The ruling stressed that courts must avoid criminalizing speech that is merely “offensive” or “contemptible” without proof of the required harm. •Broader Implications: This decision doesn’t give a free pass to swear at police—context is key. If swearing is part of threatening behavior, causes actual distress to officers or others, or occurs in a heightened situation (e.g., obstructing duty or inciting disorder), it could still lead to charges under Section 5 or other laws like Section 4A (intentional harassment). 6 9 However, it prevents police from using Section 5 as a catch-all for minor profanity, reinforcing that officers can’t routinely claim distress solely from being sworn at due to their professional role. Outcome The High Court quashed Harvey’s conviction, ruling that while the words could be seen as abusive, there was insufficient evidence that anyone was likely to be caused harassment, alarm, or distress. 10 This has influenced police guidance and public understanding, leading to fewer prosecutions for isolated swearing at officers. Note that Section 5 was amended in 2014 to remove “insulting” as a standalone trigger, narrowing its scope further to focus on threatening or abusive conduct. 1 8 In summary, the ruling protects free expression by requiring proof of actual or likely harm, recognizing that police work involves dealing with heated language without it automatically rising to a criminal level. It’s worth knowing your rights, but as the X post reply notes, it’s still wise to avoid unnecessary confrontation

Well, swearing at an officer isn’t actually an offence. They can’t claim a public order offence just because they were sworn at, since their job means they don’t experience the required harm or distress. They often try to use public order laws anyway, but the High court has ruled that swearing at police is not in itself illegal, they’ll then often try and say that there’s kids or other adults that are offended if you know about this court ruling. I’m not saying you should go around doing it, but it’s worth knowing your rights. ( I’ll find the exact ruling on Grok. It’s worth everyone knowing because it’s something they use a lot to impede free travel / be able to get an arrest etc. I’ll look .. 1/2 relevant ruling on this topic comes from the High Court of England and Wales in the case of Harvey v Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] EWHC ,decided on November 17, 2011. Although often misremembered or referred to in public discourse as a Supreme Court decision, it was actually issued by the High Court,which has significant authority in interpreting public order laws. This judgment clarified the application of Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986, which makes it an offense to use threatening, abusive, or insulting words or behavior within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm, or distress thereby. 10 It established that simply swearing at police officers, without additional context, does not automatically constitute an offense under this section because officers are generally not considered likely to experience the required level of harassment, alarm, or distress due to the nature of their profession. Key Facts of the Case •On March 10, 2009, in London, police officers (a constable and a community support officer) were conducting a stop-and-search on Denzel Harvey and two others suspected of possessing cannabis. •During the search, Harvey became frustrated and used the word “fuck” or “fucking” three times in statements like “Fuck this man, I ain’t been smoking nothing,” “Told you, you won’t find fuck all,” and “No, I’ve already fucking told you so.” •No drugs were found, but Harvey was arrested under Section 5 for his language, which the officers deemed abusive. He was later convicted at the magistrates’ court and fined £50, but he appealed to the High Court. •Importantly, no evidence was presented that the officers themselves felt harassed, alarmed, or distressed by the words. A small group of young people had gathered nearby, but there was no testimony or indication that they were affected either. 10 0 2 The Court’s Reasoning •Elements of Section 5: The offense requires two main parts: (1) the words or behavior must be threatening, abusive, or insulting, and (2) they must occur within the hearing or sight of someone likely to be caused harassment, alarm, or distress. The court acknowledged that common swear words like “fuck” can qualify as abusive or insulting in certain contexts, drawing on prior cases such as DPP v Orum [1989], where it was noted that such language is potentially offensive. 8 However, the law does not criminalize swearing in public by itself—Parliament has never made profanity a blanket crime. •Police Officers’ Resilience: Mr. Justice Bean emphasized that police officers are exposed to foul language so frequently in their duties that it typically has “little emotional impact on them save that of boredom.” 1 2 This echoes earlier guidance from the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO), which states that officers are expected to show a “degree of fortitude” and that conduct must go beyond what they normally encounter. 1 In Harvey’s case, the swearing was not directed as a threat or in an aggressive manner that escalated beyond frustration during a lawful search. Without evidence of actual or likely distress to the officers, the second element of the offense wasn’t met. •

What a smart chap this guy was he knew his rights and articulated them perfectly to the police. Personally I liked his comment “I’m 37 years of age, old enough to remember what this country was and what it’s turned into” well said mate 👏👏👏🇬🇧💪

@LolcowAgency @ELkinoboogeyman @lolcowdetective Ban evading … didnt only lose the accounts he said. He lost all the other alts used to stalk and harass in sick ways. He’s not allowed on the site so not sure why he’s back at all.

"Waaa waa I got banned". Didn't you get banned for harassing a female creator on multiple accounts? We don't do those kinds of things Dom. :) @lolcowdetective

@PunishedJack2 Well you know how I feel about a certain group I’m being flagged don’t want to get banned and you know what I think on separating Church for divorce essentially but I’m a dirty ‘prottie’ atm haha

@PunishedJack2 It’s awful isn’t it.

🤯

@kinocopter @PODAWFUL @BalldoMania @TheRalphRetort @HujanisHosting @kinocopter These are fake but that idiot I want nothing to do with either. Ok 👍

@PODAWFUL @BalldoMania @TheRalphRetort @HujanisHosting Jesse let Ralph know that if he ends up fucking Raven he won’t be having @HujanisHosting’s sloppy seconds because they never even got together. The whole relationship was fake and he creeped her out, and never let him near her kids.

Hey @TheRalphRetort Hujanis says if I can get you to unblock him, he will unblock me. fair deal? x.com/HujanisHosting…

The same paid protesters 🪧 every ‘protest’ that they’re paid to be at. NGO’s shouldn’t be allowed to have paid agitators. I mean how can’t people tell it’s not like grass roots and a community that cares. Look at them all with their professional signs that all say the same because they’ve been made by NGO’s and the paid freaks hand them out. Most don’t even live where they protest , the police end up escorting them back to train station so they get back to where they actually live safely. I’ve seen these in particular at counter protests and protests all over.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 harsh but true

Yes as you can see , completely organic with all their home made signs. Nothing to do with being paid protestors and NGO’s at all *sigh*

I mean anyone that did watch it last week. I was sent a few mins and couldn’t with his bs. But anyone in good faith watching that knows it was all lies. Everything he said I proved I was the honest one 2 years ago with that situation, so it was just him lying and calling me names.

@RavenRainnModel I wouldn't worry about him making a stream on you, no one watches him anyway.

Hmmmm , interesting information. I think someone ( with his Hog egging him on) feels brave after his psycho other British friend has come back on an alt that X didn’t ban ( after banning their main and known alt’s ) friend & another accused age play freak , harasser of teens and just psycho harasser of many actually. Weird to stop your LEGO to stream about little old me. It’s been 2 years since YOU lied and ran around trying to smear me. Let go of the obsession and build your Lego to your 15 ‘fans’ But the timing I now get. IYKYK…