Keith Weiner

57.6K posts

Keith Weiner banner
Keith Weiner

Keith Weiner

@RealKeithWeiner

Founder and CEO of @Monetary_Metals, Economist, Specializing in gold, money and credit

Katılım Temmuz 2010
1.2K Takip Edilen17.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Keith Weiner
Keith Weiner@RealKeithWeiner·
If you buy gold/silver/bitcoin, and it doesn't generate income, then you will have to sell one day. If it generates income, then that's a game changer. @Monetary_Metals pays interest on gold and silver. Currently offering 12% silver interest on silver.
English
90
42
308
107.3K
Keith Weiner
Keith Weiner@RealKeithWeiner·
@gatomontunox My point was envy. If you are right, and the next generations cling to envy, then a dark future is coming. Maybe Venezuela. Maybe North Korea.
English
1
0
1
19
Ron Damon
Ron Damon@gatomontunox·
@RealKeithWeiner You can repeat this “Socialism bad” All you want but, boomers are dying off and no one else is listing to such dribble any longer
English
1
0
0
24
Keith Weiner
Keith Weiner@RealKeithWeiner·
The envy side of socialism. Its not an error in grasping economics. It's hatred of the rich, which is hatred of productivity. You cant fix it by teaching economics. You can only address it by defending individual rights, which are not forfeit no matter how much you produce.
Malcolm Reavell@malcolm_reavell

Billionaires cause poverty, they don’t fix it. The money supply is infinite but so is the possibility of obscene wealth in a system that permits billionaires. They aren’t a benefit, they’re a cancerous symptom of exclusion and extraction, of appropriation and exploitation.

English
22
32
156
4.2K
Keith Weiner
Keith Weiner@RealKeithWeiner·
@TiredOfDaReight Whatever the word is, for the desire to make the rich poor... ... "empathy" or "compassion"... ... is not that word.
English
1
0
1
15
DSPenn
DSPenn@TiredOfDaReight·
@RealKeithWeiner The left feels empathy and compassion for those in need. The reight, despite most claiming to follow Jesus, feel nothing but hatred (or is it shame?) for those in need. Before Reagan, we taxed the rich and it worked well enough.
English
1
0
0
35
Lily Wonderland
Lily Wonderland@LilyWonderland5·
@RealKeithWeiner I love productivity, but I don't think you need billionaires for that. Millions are enough of an incentive.
English
1
0
0
34
Keith Weiner
Keith Weiner@RealKeithWeiner·
@robox1234 This view does not admit creativity nor management skill much less entrepreneurialism. It thinks that "the" production will be here regardless of how capital and entrepreneurs are treated.
English
1
0
3
28
robox1234
robox1234@robox1234·
@RealKeithWeiner On the whole billionaires have taken existing productivity spread across multiple owners/agents and consolidated it so they are the ultimate owner. Same number of jobs and output but all controlled now by a single entity extracting all the already existing profit.
English
1
0
0
56
Keith Weiner
Keith Weiner@RealKeithWeiner·
@DeadHedgeFlow Resenting somebody for his success--and wanting him to be rendered unsuccessful
English
1
0
1
40
TonyIsHere4You
TonyIsHere4You@TonyIsHere4You·
@RealKeithWeiner The problem is we now have a bunch of people who've become billionaires via currency devaluation and zero-sum asset flipping, which gives believability to the narrative that all billionaires are harmful. Ignoring that nuance will make those that do produce increasingly a target.
TonyIsHere4You tweet media
English
1
0
0
58
Keith Weiner
Keith Weiner@RealKeithWeiner·
@SamaHoole All taxes hurt people. A tax on the value of an asset is more hurtful than other taxes.
English
1
3
29
718
Sama Hoole
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole·
A farmer dies in April 2026. His son inherits the farm. The farm has been in the family since 1847. The farm consists of: 300 acres of grazing pasture, a farmhouse built in 1892, a barn, a milking parlour, two tractors of varying ages, a Land Rover that runs about 70% of the time, and a herd of 180 Hereford-cross cattle. On paper, the farm is worth approximately £3.2 million. This is because land near him has been bought recently by a London hedge fund looking for carbon credits, which has dragged the comparable value of every field within forty miles upward to a number nobody local can justify. In cash, the farm produces a profit of about £28,000 a year in a good year. In a bad year it loses money. The son also works as a fencing contractor three days a week to keep the operation viable. The inheritance tax bill on a £3.2 million estate, even at the reduced 20% rate, comes to approximately £140,000 after the increased threshold is applied. The son does not have £140,000. The son has never had £140,000. The son has £4,200 in his current account and an overdraft. The son sells 60 acres to a developer to pay the tax. The developer puts solar panels on the 60 acres. The remaining herd cannot be sustained on the reduced land. The herd is sold. The barn becomes a holiday let. A different family eats Brazilian beef this Christmas without knowing why the price went up. The Treasury collects £140,000. The land never produces British food again.
Sama Hoole tweet media
English
2K
21.1K
62.6K
1.4M
Patricia
Patricia@PatriciaNPino·
There is a lot to be said about bond market speculative activity and how damaging that can be, but an under-reported issue is the damage commodity market speculation (e.g. oil) does to consumers.
English
6
17
50
3.8K
Keith Weiner
Keith Weiner@RealKeithWeiner·
Imagine thinking when the govt pisses your money down the welfare drain, that this is "savings". Socialism seeks out capital--to consume and destroy.
Richard Murphy@RichardJMurphy

What if the national debt is not a burden at all? What if it is simply the nation’s savings? Any sensible analysis shows that this so-called debt is no such thing: it's just a massive savings bank operation. That sounds like a contradiction, but it is not. In fact, understanding this point changes almost everything about how we think about government finance, public spending, austerity and economic policy. In this video, I explain why every pound of government debt is also somebody else’s financial asset. I show why government bonds are not like household debt, why they function as savings accounts with the state, and why the financial system depends upon them. Pension funds, insurance companies, banks and many of the world’s largest investors all rely on UK government bonds as a safe place to hold wealth. I also explain why governments that issue their own currency are fundamentally different from households, why the UK government cannot run out of pounds, and why the idea that Britain must one day “pay off the national debt” makes little economic sense. The national debt exists because people and institutions want somewhere secure to save their money, and the government has a duty to accept those savings. Along the way, I challenge some of the most common myths in economics. Are bond markets really in control of governments? Do bond vigilantes dictate public policy? Does rising government debt automatically create a crisis? Or have politicians, economists and commentators misunderstood the role that government bonds actually play in a modern economy? The answers matter because misunderstanding government debt has helped justify decades of unnecessary austerity, underinvestment, and fear about public spending. If we get the nature of government bonds wrong, we get much of economic policy wrong as well. If the national debt is actually national savings, then the debate about government finance needs to start in a very different place. youtu.be/rMfCrIhlAm8?si…

English
5
9
58
1.8K
Keith Weiner
Keith Weiner@RealKeithWeiner·
@GrowSmarter_x Be honest: would you keep saying yes, no matter how much they paid?
English
4
0
27
327
Grow Smarter
Grow Smarter@GrowSmarter_x·
Be honest: should billionaires pay more taxes?
English
52
8
27
6K
Keith Weiner
Keith Weiner@RealKeithWeiner·
@ChrisMarx1917 It's a creation of Communist Manifesto Plank #5. And banks are not merely regulated. They are supervised. Govt agents housed in the bank's offices, sticking their noses into evrrything. Issuing orders. To call this "capitalism" is an attempt to bury the idea of a free market.
English
0
0
1
9
George Orwell's Angry Ghost
George Orwell's Angry Ghost@ChrisMarx1917·
@RealKeithWeiner What the fvck are you talking about? That bank is a creation of capitalists, & the only people receiving welfare in America are the rich because they control the state. Your "government bad" 18th century thinking is antiquated. Get off that libertarian rocking chair.
English
1
0
0
16
Keith Weiner
Keith Weiner@RealKeithWeiner·
This question is a trap. Let me explain. We don't have capitalism. We have a welfare state so expensive, that high progressive tax (Communist Manifesto Plank #2) can't pay for it, so we need a central bank (Plank #5). Every productive enterprise is regulated (some actively supervised), most professions are licensed. Govt outright owns roads, airports, harbors, rail, mail, radio spectrum, electrical grids, water, sewer, and schools (Plank #10). The above, including the credit cycle caused by the central bank, is why there's more and more demand for welfare. Both consumer and corporate. Another fallacy is to lump tax breaks and regulatory exemptions with subsidies. They are opposites.
Rushi@rushicrypto

If capitalism is so great, why do corporations need so many tax breaks, subsidies, exemptions, grants, legal protections, bailouts, and trade protections? When citizens need these things, why is it socialism?

English
38
118
767
30.8K
Keith Weiner
Keith Weiner@RealKeithWeiner·
@ChrisMarx1917 What bullshit is that? Saying our centrally banked welfare regulatory state is not capitalism??
English
1
0
2
20
Keith Weiner
Keith Weiner@RealKeithWeiner·
@mcuban Can you think of nothing in between the false alternatives of: 1 govt control and subsidies 2 no laws, criminals rule ??
English
3
1
31
482
Mark Cuban
Mark Cuban@mcuban·
Ok. Take government completely out of healthcare. No rules. No laws. No Medicare. No Medicaid. Hospitals, insurance companies, can do anything they want. What do they do ? If you were running any of the biggest insurance companies or hospitals, what would you do differently once gov was completely out of healthcare ?
Matthew Bednarik@BednarikMatt

@mcuban @GovBillLee Or just let the free market compete and get the government out of Healthcare. A free market would inevitably lead to lower costs for consumers.

English
1.7K
67
1.2K
2M
Spencer
Spencer@undeathmetal·
@RealKeithWeiner They get to the West and find out that's where the other 4 Balrogs are.
English
1
0
0
23
Chowdahead
Chowdahead@ChowdaheadMAINE·
@RealKeithWeiner Once nobody super wealthy is left they will go after the moderately wealthy, then the upper middle class, then the middle, until nobody has anything worth taking.
English
2
1
20
672
Keith Weiner
Keith Weiner@RealKeithWeiner·
Socialism seeks out capital, to consume and destroy. Notice that he feels owning a productive enterprise is "hoarding". He just wants to liquidate the business to provide food for a day.
𐌁𐌉Ᏽ 𐌕𐌉𐌌𐌉@OrevaZSN

Never before in history have billionaires existed at this scale. Billionaires hoard wealth that could solve hunger, housing, and healthcare crises; their existence is not a sign of success but of selfishness and systemic failure.

English
23
39
308
22.8K
Keith Weiner
Keith Weiner@RealKeithWeiner·
@dgsommersmkts To anyone who says "grow our way out of the debt", I have one thing to say. Marginal Productivity of Debt has been falling for many decades.
English
1
2
20
474
Keith Weiner
Keith Weiner@RealKeithWeiner·
"Food wastes water" ^^^not the powerful defense of data centers (or anything) he imagines it to be
Yogi@Houseofyogi

Data centers aren't draining this country's water supply, nor are they really polluting it. The people who say that have never looked at an almond farm in California. Funny how Newsom's state wastes the most water in the Union. Every data center in America: 17 billion gallons of water a year. California almond farms alone: 1.3 trillion. That's 75x. For a snack that we mostly EXPORT. Data centers are 0.3% of public water. A rounding error. And the new ones recycle it instead of letting it evaporate off. Microsoft cut potable water 97% at Quincy. Google put 4.5 billion gallons back in the ground last year. The industry is going net positive while everyone screams. You want real waste? Agriculture uses 70% of every drop this country pulls. Power plants burn through tens of trillions of gallons so your lights turn on. California ships its water hundreds of miles through OPEN aqueducts. No cover. Evaporating into the sky the whole way. Gone before it touches a single crop. No hearing for that stuff. AOC waved brown water from a family living 400 feet from a Meta construction site. Blamed AI. Brown well water next to active earthmoving is a sediment problem. Happens at every big dig. The EPA found nothing. So just MAYBE shut up and focus on things that actually impact the water supply. Want to know what actually poisons a rural well? Fertilizer runoff. Nitrates. The stuff farm country has been pumping into groundwater for decades. This is the easiest IQ test of the century. You're a sheep if you think banning data centers saves the environment or protects jobs. LOL. It's a foreign psyop with Bernie and AOC as the spokesmen. They want the exact thing our adversaries want: a slower, smaller, poorer America. The people who can't beat us in the lab figured out they can beat us in committee. Wave a jar, cry about jobs, kill a project, ship the future overseas. You think you're saving water and protecting the working class. You're digging your own grave. Those data centers get built anyway. Mexico. South America. The Middle East. Asia. The jobs get created there. The cures get found there. Just not here, if you keep this up. And to the zoomers in the back booing Eric Schmidt for saying embrace AI: Europe didn't embrace the internet. Look at their GDP and employment rate since 2000s. Now nobody asks for their opinion, while tech built in SF. Don't build AI here, and in 10 years you're moving to Qatar or China to find work. Up to you.

English
4
2
22
1.8K
Keith Weiner
Keith Weiner@RealKeithWeiner·
@tonyannett What do you think will happen to wages, if the govt stripmiines the capital out of employers?
English
1
0
19
520
Tony Annett
Tony Annett@tonyannett·
It’s shocking to me that people on this site extend more sympathy to billionaires facing a small wealth tax than working class men facing an 18% real wage decline over four decades. It’s a perfect example of what Adam Smith called the corruption of our moral sentiments.
English
57
14
87
18.8K