OmniStacheGaming

This ugly pile of dog shit. I hope he never knows peace again.

Fuller context of Driscoll's recent sermon about us. And folks; it's bad, with Mark repeatedly lying. 🚨🚨🚨 1. He doesn't seem to be a fan of new media, saying that blogs, social media, and YouTube "do not count as journalism" and should not be considered 'news.' Right prior to this, he would add: There's just wild, stupid, crazy stuff on the internet. So you gotta be careful and you gotta be discerning..you shall not go around as a slanderer. A slanderer is this, it's character assassination. You're trying to murder, Jesus calls this heart murder.... And so if you hate someone, if you wanna slander them, if you wanna libel them, if you wanna destroy them, if you wanna assassinate them, what you do is you speak evil and malice against them. 2. After saying that his job description is to "tell the truth and get lied about," he says that we wrote a "article-hit" (and we note, not just a "headline-hit") where we repeatedly lied about him. 3. Driscoll explains, "What they didn't say was, it was a woman preaching to women at a women's meeting about not being feminists. They're like, (mimics smoking weed) 'oh those are details.' I know they're details. I know. 4. Repeats his claim that "So what they didn't tell you was that it was preaching to women." 5. Reiterates "I will always tell the truth, I will never pull a punch, and when I am wrong, I will repent so that I can be in agreement with the truth." 6. Mark is likely hoping no one from his congregation reads the nasty "article-hit," otherwise they would see he's leading them astray. We specifically say in the article: "Driscoll repeatedly defended pastor Millicent's preaching and presence at his church, justifying it by pointing out that she was preaching to women and that it was part of a midweek gathering." 7. Because we care about getting things right and giving proper context, we also included the snapshot (below) of Driscoll saying that very thing, so folks could see him saying in his own words that the preaching was relegated to the women only at a women's event. 8. And again, we have no issue with women teaching women. That's not an emphasis we have any problem, though it makes for a nice strawman. The issue is Mark inviting a female 'Executive Pastor' of a church whose Co-Lead Pastor is also a woman. 9. Specifically, because Mark previously wrote in one of his books that women are "unfit" to lead the church, but has as of yet to explain why it's ok expose his womenfolk to "unfit" pastoral teaching. Call us conspiratorial, but given the reputation that Driscoll has, or perhaps now 'has,' we get the sense that her title of pastor wasn’t featured too prominently in the event promo material, and would even wager that for many of his congregants, the first time they heard about it was our article or his message now.